American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics
p-ISSN: 2162-948X e-ISSN: 2162-8475
2015; 5(5): 272-284
doi:10.5923/j.ajms.20150505.08
Khaled K. Jaber
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and information technology, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan
Correspondence to: Khaled K. Jaber, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and information technology, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2015 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
In this paper magneto hydrodynamics free-convective fluid flow in a vertical porous channel rotates with a uniform angular velocity Ω about the axis normal to the plates in the presence of Hall current, viscous dissipation and Joule heating is investigated. The flow is subjected to a strong transverse magnetic field. A constant suction and injection is applied to the two insulating porous plates. The Boussinesq approximation is neglected due to the large temperature differences between the plate and the ambient fluid. Suitable transformations are used to convert the governing system into dimensionless nonlinear partial differential equations that are solved numerically. The effects of magnetic parameter, Grashof number, Eckert number and other involved parameters on the velocity and temperature functions have been studied parametrically. All parameters involved in the problem affect the flow and thermal distributions. Numerical values of the local, skin-friction and the local Nusselt numbers for various parametric conditions have been tabulated.
Keywords: Free convective, Porous channel, Hall current, Viscous dissipation, Joule heating
Cite this paper: Khaled K. Jaber, Influence of Hall Current and Viscous Dissipation on MHD Convective Heat and Mass Transfer in a Rotating Porous Channel with Joule Heating, American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 5 No. 5, 2015, pp. 272-284. doi: 10.5923/j.ajms.20150505.08.
![]() | Figure 1. Physical configuration of the problem |
![]() | (1) |
is the electric current density vector, V is the velocity vector, E is the intensity vector of the electric field, B is the induced magnetic vector, m is the Hall parameter and e is the charge of an electron, ne is the number density of electrons. We also assume that E = 0. The equation of conservation of electric charge is
, which gives that Jy=constant, this constant is zero since the plate is electrically non-conducting i. e. Jz=0 at the plates. The current density components Jx and Jy are given by![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
![]() | (8) |
and
are the coefficients of thermal and solute expansion, Here u and v are the velocity component associated with x and y directions measured along and normal to the vertical plate, respectively; T is the temperature of the fluid in the boundary layer; Td is the temperature far away from the sheet; g is the acceleration due to gravity; CP is the specific heat at constant pressure,
is the fluid kinematics viscosity;
is the density; σ is the electrical conductivity; K is the thermal conductivity; and Q is heat generation and(or) absorption coefficient, Dm is the molecular diffusivity.The physical problem suggests the following boundary conditions: ![]() | (9) |
![]() | (10) |
![]() | (11) |
![]() | (12) |
![]() | (13) |
![]() | (14) |
![]() | (15) |
![]() | (16) |
is the Schmidt number,
is the reaction parameter,
is the Grashof number,
is the modified solute Grashof number,
is the Eckert number,
is the Hartmann number,
is the magnetic number,
is the heat generation parameter,
is the Prandtl number.The numerical values of
,
,
,
for Pr=0.72, and several values of the magnetic, Hartmnn, Eckert and others parameters are tabulated in table 1.![]() | Figure 2. Effect of Ec on the primary flow velocity profiles U with M = 2, m = Ha = Sc = 1, ξ = Qh =0.1, and G r = Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 3. Effect of Ec on the secondary flow velocity profiles V with M = 2, m = Ha = Sc=1, ξ = Qh =0.1, and G r = Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 4. Effect of Ec on the temperature transfer profiles with M = 2, m = Ha =Sc=1, ξ = Qh =0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 5. Effect of Gm on the primary flow velocity profiles U with M = 2, m = Ha= Ec =Sc=1, ξ = Qh =0.1, and G r = 2 |
![]() | Figure 6. Effect of Gm on the secondary flow velocity profiles V with M = 2, m = Ha = Ec = Sc=1, ξ = Qh =0.1, and G r = 2 |
![]() | Figure 7. Effect of Gm on the temperature profile M = 2, m = Ha= Ec = Sc = 1, ξ = Qh = 0.1, and G r = 2 |
![]() | Figure 8. Effect of Gr on the primary flow velocity profiles U with M = 2, m = Ha= Ec =Sc=1, ξ = Qh =0.1, and G m = 2 |
![]() | Figure 9. Effect of Gr on the secondary flow velocity profiles V with M = 2, m = Ha= Ec =Sc=1, ξ = Qh =0.1, and G m = 2 |
![]() | Figure 10. Effect of Gr on the temperature transfer profiles with M = 2, m = Ha= Ec =Sc=1, ξ = Qh =0.1, and G m = 2 |
![]() | Figure 11. Effect of m on the primary flow velocity profiles U with M = 2, Ha =Sc=1, ξ = Qh = Ec =0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 12. Effect of m on the secondary flow velocity profiles V with M = 2, Ha =Sc=1, ξ = Qh = Ec =0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 13. Effect of Ha on the primary flow velocity profiles U with M = 2, m = Sc=1, ξ = Qh = Ec =0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 14. Effect of Ha on the secondary flow velocity profiles V with M = 2, m = Sc=1, ξ = Qh = Ec =0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 15. Effect of Ha on the temperature transfer profiles with M = 2, m = Sc=1, ξ = Qh = Ec =0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 16. Effect of M on the primary flow velocity profiles U with Ha = m = Sc =1, ξ = Qh = Ec =0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 17. Effect of M on the secondary flow velocity profiles V with Ha = m = Sc =1, ξ = Qh = Ec =0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 18. Effect of M on the temperature transfer profiles with Ha = m = Sc =1, ξ = Qh = Ec =0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 19. Effect of Sc on the primary flow velocity profiles U with M = 2, Ha = m =1, ξ = Ec = Qh = 0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 20. Effect of Sc on the secondary flow velocity profiles V with M = 2, Ha = m =1, ξ = Ec = Qh = 0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 21. Effect of Sc on the mass transfer profiles with M = 2, Ha = m =1, ξ = Ec = Qh = 0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 22. Effect of on the primary flow velocity profiles U with M = 2, Ec = Ha = m =1, Ec = Qh = 0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 23. Effect of on the secondary flow velocity profiles V with M = 2, Ec = Ha = m =1, Ec = Qh = 0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
![]() | Figure 24. Effect of on the mass transfer profiles with M = 2, Ec = Ha = m =1, Ec = Qh = 0.1, and G r= Gm = 2 |
| [1] | M. A. El-Hakiem, “MHD oscillatory flow on free convectionradiation through a porous medium with constant suction velocity,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 220, no. 2-3, pp. 271–276, 2000. |
| [2] | B. S. Jaiswal and V. M. Soundalgekar, “Oscillating plate temperature effects on a flow past an infinite vertical porous plate with constant suction and embedded in a porous medium,” Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 37, no. 2-3, pp. 125–131, 2001. |
| [3] | K. D. Singh, M. G. Gorla, and H. Raj, “A periodic solution of oscillatory couette flow through porous medium in rotating system,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 151–159, 2005. |
| [4] | D. Pal and I. S. Shivakumara, “Mixed convection heat transfer from a vertical heated plate embedded in a sparsely packed porous medium,” International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 929–939, 2006. |
| [5] | T. G. Cowling, Magnetohydrodynamics, Interscience Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 1957. |
| [6] | Mandal, G. and Mandal, K.K., “Effect of Hall Current on MHD Couette Flow between Thick Arbitrarily Conducting Plates in a Rotating System”, J. Physical Soc. Japan, 52, 470-477, 1983. |
| [7] | Ghosh, S.K., B´eg, O.A. and Narahari, M., “Hall Effects on MHD Flow in a Rotating System with Heat Transfer Characteristics”, Meccanica, DOI10.1007/s11012-009-9210-6, Published Online: 2009. |
| [8] | A. S. Gupta, “Hydromagnetic flow past a porous flat plate with hall effects,” Acta Mechanica, vol. 22, no. 3-4, pp. 281–287, 1975. |
| [9] | R. N. Jana, A. S. Gupta, and N. Datta, “Hall effects on the hydro magnetic flow past an infinite porous flat plate,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1767–1772, 1977. |
| [10] | O. D. Makinde and P. Y. Mhone, “Heat transfer to MHD oscillatory flow in a channel filled with porous medium,” Romanian Journal of Physics, vol. 50, pp. 931–938, 2005. |
| [11] | Z. Zhang and J. Wang, “On the similarity solutions of magnetohydrodynamic flows of power-law fluids over a stretching sheet,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 330, no. 1, pp. 207–220, 2007. |
| [12] | E. M. Aboeldahab and E. M. E. Elbarbary, “Hall current effect on magnetohydrodynamic free-convection flow past a semi-infinite vertical plate with mass transfer,” International Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 39, no. 14, pp. 1641–1652, 2001. |
| [13] | E. M. Abo-Eldahab and M. A. El Aziz, “Viscous dissipation and Joule heating effects on MHD-free convection from a vertical plate with power-law variation in surface temperature in the presence of Hall and ion-slip currents,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 579–595, 2005. |
| [14] | Jaber K. K., “Combined effects of Hall current and variable Viscosity on Non-Newtonian MHD flow past a stretching vertical plate”, Journal of Advances in Mathematics, Vol. 7, No.3 (2014). |
| [15] | Jaber K. K., “Effect of Hall currents and variable fluid properties on MHD flow past stretching vertical plate by the presence of radiation”, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2, 888-902 (2014). |
| [16] | Jaber K. K.,” Effect of viscous dissipation and Joule heating on MHD flow of a fluid with variable properties past a stretching vertical plate” European Scientific Journal , vol.10, No.33, (2014). |