Waggas Galib Atshan1, Ali Hussein Battor2, Amal Mohammed Dereush2
1Department of Mathematics, College of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Al-Qadisiya, Diwaniya, Iraq
2Department of Mathematics, College of Education for Girls, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq
Correspondence to: Waggas Galib Atshan, Department of Mathematics, College of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Al-Qadisiya, Diwaniya, Iraq.
Email: |  |
Copyright © 2014 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
In this paper, we have introduced and studied a new class of multivalent functions in the open unit disk
we obtain some interesting properties, like, coefficient inequality, distortion bounds, closure theorems, radii of starlikeness, convexity and close-to-convexity, weighted mean, neighborhoods and partial sums.
Keywords:
Multivalent Function, Convolution, Distortion, Neighborhoods, Partial Sums, Weighted Mean, Linear Operator
Cite this paper: Waggas Galib Atshan, Ali Hussein Battor, Amal Mohammed Dereush, On a New Class of Multivalent Functions with Negative Coefficient Defined by Hadamard Product Involving a Linear Operator, American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 4 No. 3, 2014, pp. 147-155. doi: 10.5923/j.ajms.20140403.03.
1. Introduction
Let
denote the class of all functions of the from | (1) |
which are analytic and multivalent in the open unit disk
Let
denote the subclass of
consisting of functions of the from  | (2) |
which are analytic and multivalent in the open unit disk
For the function
given by (2) and
defined by  | (3) |
we define the convolution (or Hadamard product) of
by | (4) |
A function
is said to be p-valentlystarlike of order
if and only if  | (5) |
A function
is said to be p-valently convex of order
if and only if | (6) |
A function
is said to be p-valently close-to-convex of order
if and only if | (7) |
Definition 1 [8]: Let
and
Then we define the linear operator | (8) |
Definition 2: Let
be a fixed function defined by (3). The function
given by (2) is said to be in the class
if and only if | (9) |
where 

Some of the following properties studied for other class in [1], [2], [3], [4], [6] and [7].
2. Coefficient Inequalities
Theorem 1: Let
. Then
if and only if | (10) |
where
The result is sharp for the function | (11) |
Proof: Suppose that the inequality (10) holds true and
Then we have
by hypothesis.Hence, by maximum modulus principle,
Conversely, suppose that
Then from (9), we have
Since
for all
we get | (12) |
We choose the value of
on the real axis, so that
is real.Letting
through real values, we obtain inequality (10).Finally, sharpness follows if we take | (13) |
Corollary 1: Let
Then | (14) |
3. Growth and Distortion Theorems
Theorem 2: Let the function
Then  | (15) |
Proof:
By Theorem 1, we get | (16) |
Thus
also
and the proof is complete.Theorem 3: Let
Then
Proof: Notice that | (17) |
from Theorem 1, thus | (18) |
On the other hand | (19) |
Combining (18) and (19), we get the result.Closure Theorems:Theorem 4: Let the function
defined by | (20) |
be in the class
for every
Then the function
defined by
also belongs to the class
where
Proof: Since
then by Theorem 1, we have | (21) |
for every
Hence
By Theorem 1, it follows that
Theorem 5: Let the function
defined by (20) be in the class
for every
Then the function
defined by
is also in the class
Proof: By definition of
we have
Since
are in the class
for every
we obtain
4. Radii of Starlikeness, Convexity and Close-to-Convexity
In the following theorems, we obtain the radii of starlikeness, convexity and close-to-convexity for the class
Theorem 6: If
then
is p-valentlystarlike of order
in the dick
where
Proof: It is sufficient to show that
for
we have
Thus
if | (22) |
Hence, by Theorem 1, (22) will be true if
or if
Setting
we get the desired result.Theorem 7: If
Then
is p-valently convex of order
in the disk
where
Proof: It is sufficient to show that
for
we have
Thus
if | (23) |
Hence by Theorem 1, (23) will be true if
and hence
Setting
we get the desired result.Theorem 8: Let the function
Then
is p-valently close-to-convex of order
in the disk
where
Proof: It is sufficient to show that
for
we have
Thus
if | (24) |
hence, by Theorem 1, (24) will be true if
and hence
Setting
we get the desired result.
5. Weighted Mean
Definition 3: Let
be in the class
Then the weighted mean
of
is given by
Theorem 9: Let
be in the class
Then the weighted mean
of
is also in the class
Poof: By Definition 3, we have | (25) |
Since
are in the class
so by Theorem 1, we get
and
Hence
Therefore
The proof is complete.
6. Neighborhoods and Partial Sums
Now we define the
neighborhoods of the function
by | (26) |
For identity function 
 | (27) |
The concept of neighborhoods was first introduced by Goodman [5] and then generalized by Ruscheweyh [9].Definition 4: A function
is said to be in the class
if there exist a function
such that
Theorem 10: If
and | (28) |
Then
Proof: Let
Then we have from (26) that
which readily implies the following coefficient inequality
Next, since
we have from Theorem 1
so that
Then by Definition 3,
for every
given by (28).Now, we introduce the partial sums.Theorem 11: Let
be given by (2) and define the
by
and | (30) |
suppose also that | (31) |
Thus, we have | (32) |
and | (33) |
Each of the bounds in (32) and (33) is the best possible for
Proof: For the coefficients
given by (31), it is not difficult to verity that
Therefore, by using the hypothesis (30), we have | (34) |
By setting
and applying (34), we find that
This prove (32). Therefore,
and we obtain
Now, in the same manner, we prove the assertion(33), by setting
and this completes the proof.
References
[1] | W. G. Atshan, On a certain class of multivalent functions defined by Hadamard product, Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 3(9)(2013), : 891-902. |
[2] | W. G. Atshan and A. S. Joudah, Subclass of meromorphic univalent functions defined by Hadamard product with multiplier transformation, Int. Math. Forum, 6(46) (2011), 2279-2292. |
[3] | W. G. Atshan and S. R. Kulkarni, On application of differential subordination for certain subclass of meromorphically p-valent functions with positive coefficients defined by linear operator, J. Ineq. Pute Appl. Math., 10(2)(2009), Articale 53, 11 pages. |
[4] | W. G. Atshan, H. J. Mustafa and E. k. Mouajueed, Subclass of multivalent functions defined by Hadamard product involving a linear operator, Int. Journal of Math. Analysis Vol 7. 2013, no. 24, 1193-1206. |
[5] | A. W. Goodman, Univalent functions and non-analytic curves, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 8(3)(1957), 598-601. |
[6] | S. M. Khairua and M. More, Some analytic and multivalent functions defined by subordination property. Gen. Math. 17(3) (2009) 105-124. |
[7] | H. Mahzoon, New subclass of multivalent functions defined by differential subordination. Appl. Math. Sciences, 6(95) (2012), 4701. |
[8] | H. Mahzoon and S. Latha, Neighborhoods of multivalent functions, Int. Journal of Math. Anlysis, 3(30) (2009), 15011-1507. |
[9] | S. Rucheweyh, Neighborhoods of univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 81(1981), 521-527. |