American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics

p-ISSN: 2162-948X    e-ISSN: 2162-8475

2014;  4(3): 147-155

doi:10.5923/j.ajms.20140403.03

On a New Class of Multivalent Functions with Negative Coefficient Defined by Hadamard Product Involving a Linear Operator

Waggas Galib Atshan1, Ali Hussein Battor2, Amal Mohammed Dereush2

1Department of Mathematics, College of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Al-Qadisiya, Diwaniya, Iraq

2Department of Mathematics, College of Education for Girls, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq

Correspondence to: Waggas Galib Atshan, Department of Mathematics, College of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Al-Qadisiya, Diwaniya, Iraq.

Email:

Copyright © 2014 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

In this paper, we have introduced and studied a new class of multivalent functions in the open unit disk we obtain some interesting properties, like, coefficient inequality, distortion bounds, closure theorems, radii of starlikeness, convexity and close-to-convexity, weighted mean, neighborhoods and partial sums.

Keywords: Multivalent Function, Convolution, Distortion, Neighborhoods, Partial Sums, Weighted Mean, Linear Operator

Cite this paper: Waggas Galib Atshan, Ali Hussein Battor, Amal Mohammed Dereush, On a New Class of Multivalent Functions with Negative Coefficient Defined by Hadamard Product Involving a Linear Operator, American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 4 No. 3, 2014, pp. 147-155. doi: 10.5923/j.ajms.20140403.03.

1. Introduction

Let denote the class of all functions of the from
(1)
which are analytic and multivalent in the open unit disk
Let denote the subclass of consisting of functions of the from
(2)
which are analytic and multivalent in the open unit disk
For the function given by (2) and defined by
(3)
we define the convolution (or Hadamard product) of by
(4)
A function is said to be p-valentlystarlike of order if and only if
(5)
A function is said to be p-valently convex of order if and only if
(6)
A function is said to be p-valently close-to-convex of order if and only if
(7)
Definition 1 [8]: Let and
Then we define the linear operator
(8)
Definition 2: Let be a fixed function defined by (3). The function given by (2) is said to be in the class if and only if
(9)
where
Some of the following properties studied for other class in [1], [2], [3], [4], [6] and [7].

2. Coefficient Inequalities

Theorem 1: Let . Then if and only if
(10)
where
The result is sharp for the function
(11)
Proof: Suppose that the inequality (10) holds true and Then we have
by hypothesis.
Hence, by maximum modulus principle,
Conversely, suppose that Then from (9), we have
Since for all we get
(12)
We choose the value of on the real axis, so that is real.
Letting through real values, we obtain inequality (10).
Finally, sharpness follows if we take
(13)
Corollary 1: Let Then
(14)

3. Growth and Distortion Theorems

Theorem 2: Let the function Then
(15)
Proof:
By Theorem 1, we get
(16)
Thus
also
and the proof is complete.
Theorem 3: Let Then
Proof: Notice that
(17)
from Theorem 1, thus
(18)
On the other hand
(19)
Combining (18) and (19), we get the result.
Closure Theorems:
Theorem 4: Let the function defined by
(20)
be in the class for every Then the function defined by
also belongs to the class where
Proof: Since then by Theorem 1, we have
(21)
for every
Hence
By Theorem 1, it follows that
Theorem 5: Let the function defined by (20) be in the class for every Then the function defined by
is also in the class
Proof: By definition of we have
Since are in the class for every we obtain

4. Radii of Starlikeness, Convexity and Close-to-Convexity

In the following theorems, we obtain the radii of starlikeness, convexity and close-to-convexity for the class
Theorem 6: If then is p-valentlystarlike of order in the dick where
Proof: It is sufficient to show that
for we have
Thus
if
(22)
Hence, by Theorem 1, (22) will be true if
or if
Setting we get the desired result.
Theorem 7: If Then is p-valently convex of order in the disk where
Proof: It is sufficient to show that
for we have
Thus
if
(23)
Hence by Theorem 1, (23) will be true if
and hence
Setting we get the desired result.
Theorem 8: Let the function Then is p-valently close-to-convex of order in the disk where
Proof: It is sufficient to show that
for we have
Thus
if
(24)
hence, by Theorem 1, (24) will be true if
and hence
Setting we get the desired result.

5. Weighted Mean

Definition 3: Let be in the class Then the weighted mean of is given by
Theorem 9: Let be in the class Then the weighted mean of is also in the class
Poof: By Definition 3, we have
(25)
Since are in the class so by Theorem 1, we get
and
Hence
Therefore
The proof is complete.

6. Neighborhoods and Partial Sums

Now we define the neighborhoods of the function by
(26)
For identity function
(27)
The concept of neighborhoods was first introduced by Goodman [5] and then generalized by Ruscheweyh [9].
Definition 4: A function is said to be in the class if there exist a function such that
Theorem 10: If and
(28)
Then
Proof: Let Then we have from (26) that
which readily implies the following coefficient inequality
Next, since we have from Theorem 1
so that
Then by Definition 3, for every given by (28).
Now, we introduce the partial sums.
Theorem 11: Let be given by (2) and define the by
and
(30)
suppose also that
(31)
Thus, we have
(32)
and
(33)
Each of the bounds in (32) and (33) is the best possible for
Proof: For the coefficients given by (31), it is not difficult to verity that
Therefore, by using the hypothesis (30), we have
(34)
By setting
and applying (34), we find that
This prove (32). Therefore, and we obtain
Now, in the same manner, we prove the assertion(33), by setting
and this completes the proof.

References

[1]  W. G. Atshan, On a certain class of multivalent functions defined by Hadamard product, Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 3(9)(2013), : 891-902.
[2]  W. G. Atshan and A. S. Joudah, Subclass of meromorphic univalent functions defined by Hadamard product with multiplier transformation, Int. Math. Forum, 6(46) (2011), 2279-2292.
[3]  W. G. Atshan and S. R. Kulkarni, On application of differential subordination for certain subclass of meromorphically p-valent functions with positive coefficients defined by linear operator, J. Ineq. Pute Appl. Math., 10(2)(2009), Articale 53, 11 pages.
[4]  W. G. Atshan, H. J. Mustafa and E. k. Mouajueed, Subclass of multivalent functions defined by Hadamard product involving a linear operator, Int. Journal of Math. Analysis Vol 7. 2013, no. 24, 1193-1206.
[5]  A. W. Goodman, Univalent functions and non-analytic curves, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 8(3)(1957), 598-601.
[6]  S. M. Khairua and M. More, Some analytic and multivalent functions defined by subordination property. Gen. Math. 17(3) (2009) 105-124.
[7]  H. Mahzoon, New subclass of multivalent functions defined by differential subordination. Appl. Math. Sciences, 6(95) (2012), 4701.
[8]  H. Mahzoon and S. Latha, Neighborhoods of multivalent functions, Int. Journal of Math. Anlysis, 3(30) (2009), 15011-1507.
[9]  S. Rucheweyh, Neighborhoods of univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 81(1981), 521-527.