American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics
p-ISSN: 2162-948X e-ISSN: 2162-8475
2013; 3(3): 135-142
doi:10.5923/j.ajms.20130303.06
T. O. Ojo, N. Forcheh, L. Mokgatlhe, D. K. Shangodoyin
Department of Statistics University of Botswana Gaborone, Botswana
Correspondence to: T. O. Ojo, Department of Statistics University of Botswana Gaborone, Botswana.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
To date in literature, the positive growth in an economy is tied to possible growth in power sector and modelling power growth forms the basis of power system expansion planning .The objective of this study is to develop a model that will accommodate aggregated interior and exterior factors, the proposed growth model modified the Bass Model using Indirect and Non-Linear Least Square as an evaluation technique. The study reveals that for Botswana and Nigeria the rate of external
and internal
factors influence on consumption is 0.2 and 0.4 for Botswana and 0.01 and 0.01 for Nigeria respectively using indirect least square and 0.9 and 0.4 and 7% both for Botswana and Nigeria respectively using Non-linear least square. It is evident that rates computed for Nigeria power consumption fall within the purview of the Bass model parameters’ benchmark reported by (Sterman, 2000). In particular, we observed that the internal factor rate is overstated by ILS for Botswana data, indicating the unconditional likelihood that some of the powers generated are yet to be consumed due to the constraints caused be internal and external factors affecting the power sector.
Keywords: Bass Model, Indirect Least Square, Non- Linear Least Square, Benchmark, Unconditional Likelihood
Cite this paper: T. O. Ojo, N. Forcheh, L. Mokgatlhe, D. K. Shangodoyin, Statistical Modeling of Growth in Power Consumption with Reference to Botswana and Nigeria, American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2013, pp. 135-142. doi: 10.5923/j.ajms.20130303.06.
![]() | (1) |
Initial Power diffused by BPC/PHCN at time t.
= Coefficient of innovation (due to external influence on consumers) i.e. it corresponds to the probability of an initial power consumed by customers at time 
= Coefficient of imitation (due to internal influence) i.e. word of mouth influence by customers.
=the volume of initial power consumed (i.e. adopters/adoptions/subscriber) of the power over the total period, and
= Number of previous consumers/customers/ subscribers at time
The assumptions of the Bass theory are formulated in terms of a continuous model and a density function of time to initial power consumer/subscribers, and a few conditions need to be imposed on the estimation techniques i.e.
[16].The solution in which time is the only variable is given by;![]() | (2) |
from the time series data on power consumed, the following analogue to equation (1) was used:![]() | (3) |
, given by
are obtained. The parameters of the basic model (
) in (1) are identified in terms of these regression coefficients derived as:![]() | (4) |
is fixed, the mean and variance of
of the estimators given in equation (4) are derived as:![]() | (5) |
![]() | (6) |
Which intrinsically, is non-linear in both parameters and exogenous variables. Suppose that we consider
with
then we have;![]() | (7) |
![]() | (8) |
Assume that
is deterministic numbers and we want to estimate
by linearization (Gauss- Newton) method as follows; If we are given the deterministic part of
as defined in equation (8) , then we have:
With two (2) parameters and we can linearize
in the neighbourhood of
given;
This reduces to;![]() | (9) |
gives some correct values of
in the original model with
replacing
; also we set
and;
, is the 2-partial derivatives of
with
. Equation (9) can then be written as:
,by rearranging and adding the error terms it reduces to;![]() | (10) |
in equation (10), we have:![]() | (11) |
![]() | (12) |
column in the linear regression case, then the least square estimate of
can be written as;![]() | (13) |
that minimize the sum of squares:![]() | (14) |
, we have;![]() | (15) |
and would be used at the next iteration. Thus
is the first revised estimate of
and continues until convergence takes place; so at the iteration we have the
estimate as:![]() | (16) |
Where
is some small number say
. Also, at every
iteration, we compute
to ensure that a reduction in the sum of squares has taking place; the residual mean square would be computed using:
, as an estimate of
.The asymptotic covariance of
is;
is the matrix of partial derivatives defined above and evaluated at the final iteration least squares estimate of
; that is,
Equation (15) will produced the values of the needed parameters of Bass model as also defined in (2) for Indirect least square.In practice, one is interested in estimating the three key parameters in equations (4) and (15) with associated statistical properties for both Indirect and Non-linear least squares respectively to be able to predict power growth in terms of power consumption, the estimates of
are substituted into equation (3) to yields the S-shaped diffusion curve captured by the Bass model, for this curve,additional motivation is the point of inflection (which is the maximum penetration rate,
), which occurs when, the peak value of
and the predicted time of this peak are shown to be;![]() | (17) |
) and internal (
) diffusion rates and obtain the saturation point () for the periods. Equation (2) yields
curved as shown in figure 1 through 4, the
diffusion curves captured by the Bass model as displayed shows an evolution over time (
) of the cumulative power consumption penetration (
) and the penetration changes per time unit
i.e.
. From the power consumption growth curves, in the early stages, radical innovation take place, while in the subsequent growth phases incremental innovations occurs, and eventually, saturation takes places and the power growth curve as presented in figure 1 through 4 presented some variations in the power consumption performance as a function of time. It is observed that
for all the methods utilized. The power consumption output (MW) for Botswana (March,2005-May,2012) and Nigeria (March,2005-May,2012) converges in most cases to the same values as showed in figure 1 through 4, indicating the power consumption saturation levels for both countries. And, comparing the values of the parameters presented in Table 1 through 4 obtained using Indirect and Non-linear least squares methods, the internal influence (
) using Non-linear approach have influence on Botswana power consumption pattern and it fell within the Bass benchmark of 0.38 to 0.5 according to[11]. However, the external influence (
) for both ILS and NLS fell outside the range, indicating that the rate of power consumption is only affected by consumers who are already using the power.The Nigeria power consumption is majorly influenced by the external influences as indicated by both Indirect and Non-linear least squares (
), these competitive techniques yielded the same values which is within the benchmark of 0.03 to 0.01 according to[11]. But the internal influence (
) for both ILS and NLS are outside the benchmark range, indicating the likelihood of power generated are not yet consumed by power subscribers due to constraints caused by internal and external factors affecting the power sector.
obtained can be used to make power consumption projection and these can be a very useful performance capacity planning for a power generation plants, estimating power unit production costs, forecasting revenue and cash flow overtime. From the managerial point of view, the extractions of the Bass diffusion parameters
early in the power consumption process will be most interesting for power planning purposes, while for research purposes, the determination of the Bass diffusion parameters will be used for the validity of the diffusion model and possibly refining the model. Hence, from the power consumption policy view point, it helps in obtaining an accurate idea about the power consumption saturation level early in the consumption process, this will helps in the power consumption capacity efficient planning and projection policy.
|
|
|
|
![]() | Figure 1. THE diffusion Curve Captured by the Bass Model CumulativeForecast using Indirect Least Square (ILS) |
![]() | Figure 2. THE diffusion Curve Captured by the Bass Model Cumulative Forecast using Non-Linear Least Square (NLS) for Power Consumption in Botswana (BPC) |
![]() | Figure 3. THE diffusion Curve Captured by the Bass Model Cumulative Forecast using Indirect Least Square (ILS) |
![]() | Figure 4. THE diffusion Curve Captured by the Bass Model Cumulative Forecast using Non-Linear Least Square (NLS) for Power Consumption in Nigeria (PHCN) |