Simge Öztunç , Ali Mutlu
Celal Bayar University , Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Mathematics, Muradiye Campus, 45047, Manisa, Turkey
Correspondence to: Simge Öztunç , Celal Bayar University , Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Mathematics, Muradiye Campus, 45047, Manisa, Turkey.
Email: |  |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
In this paper we recall some properties in digital topology for example, digital set, digital function, digital homotopy etc. from Boxer[5] and then give the definition of digital category. Also we present digital version of important category models.
Keywords:
Digital Image, Digital Continuous Maps, Digital Homotopy, Digital Path, Digital Category
Cite this paper: Simge Öztunç , Ali Mutlu , Categories in Digital Images, American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2013, pp. 62-66. doi: 10.5923/j.ajms.20130301.09.
1. Introduction
Digital Topology is a branch of mathematics where the image processing and digital image processing is studied. Many Mathematicians, for example Rosenfeld, Kopperman, Han, Kong, Malgouyres, Boxer, Ayala, Karaca and others have contributed this area with their research. The notion of digital image, digital continuous map and digital homotopy studied in[3, 4, 6, 7, 12, 16]. Their recognition and efficient computation became a useful material for our study. Then we carry this notion to category theory and we construct some fundamental category models in digital topology. In section two we recall some definitions and properties from Boxer[5] in section three we introduce the ‘Digital Category’ and give basic examples of digital categories in order to construct a tool for category theory researchers.
2. Preliminaries
In this paper we denote the set of integers by
. Then
represents the set of lattice points in Euclidean
dimensional spaces. A finite subset of
is called to be digital image.We will use a variety of adjacency relations it the digital image research. The following[7] are commonly used. Two points
and
in
are
if they are distinct and differ by at most
in each coordinate;
and
in
are
if they are
and differ in exactly one coordinate. Two points
and
in
are
if they are distinct and differ by at most
in each coordinate; they are
if they are
and differ in at most two coordinates; they are
if they are
and differ in exactly one coordinate. For
, a
of a lattice point
is a point that is
to
. We generalize
in
and
in
by taking
are
if
and
and
differ by
in one coordinate and by
in all other coordinates.More extensive adjacency relations are investigated in[5]. In the following, if
is an adjacency relation defined for an integer
on
as one of the
discussed above, that is, if
or
.We assume
as
,
as
,etc.Suppose that
be an
relation defined on
. A digital image
is
[5] if and only if for every pair of points
there is a set
such that
and
and
are
.Definition 2.1. Let
and
are digital images such that
,
. Then the digital function
is a function which is defined between digital images.Definition 2.2. ([3]; see also[15]) Let
and
are digital images such that
,
. Assume that
be a function. Let
be an
relation defined on
,
.
is called to be
if the image under
of every
subset of
is
.A function satisfying Definition 2.1 is referred to be digitally continuous. A consequence of this definition is given below.Definition 2.3. ([3]; see also[15]) Let and are digital images. Then the function
is said to be
if and only if for every
such that
and
are
, either
or
and
are
.Definition 2.4. ([2]) Let
,
. A digital interval is a set of the form
in which
is assumed. For example, if
is an
relation on a digital image
, then
is
if and only if for every
, either
or
and
are
.Definition 2.5. ([3]; see also[6]) suppose that
and
be digital images. Let
be
functions. Assume there is a positive integer
and a function
such thati) For all
and
;ii) For all
, the induced function
defined by
for all
is
.iii) For all
, the induced function
defined by
for all
is
.Then
is called to be a digital
between
and
, and
and
are said to be digitally
in
.We use the notation
to denote
and
are digitally
in
.Definition 2.6.[4]A digital
in a digital image is a
function
. Also if
, we say that
is a digital
, and the point
is the base point of the loop
. If
is a constant function, then it is called a trivial loop.If
and
are digital
in
such that
starts where
ends, the product of
and
, written
, is intuitively, the
obtained by following
by
. Formally
,
and
, then
is defined by
Definition 2.7. Let
and
be
functions. Two paths
and
, mapping the digital interval
, are said to be digital path homotopic if they have the same initial point
and the same final point
, and there is a
map
such that
for each
and each
. We call to be a digital path homotopy between
and
, and we write
.
3. Digital Categories
Definition 3.1. A digital category is a quintuple
where (i)
is a class whose members are called
object. object are digital images.(ii)
is a class whose members are called
morphisms.
morphisms are digital functions which is defined between digital sets.(iii)
and
are digital functions from
to (
is called the domain of
and
is called the codomain of
)(iv)
is a function from
into
, called the composition law of
such that the following conditions are satisfied:(1) Matching Condition: If
is defined, then
and
;(2) Associativity Condition: If
and
are defined, then
;(3) Identity Existence Condition: For each
object
there exist
morphism
such that
and (a)
whenever
is defined, and(b)
whenever
is defined;(4) Smallness of Morphism Class Condition: For any pair
of
objects, the class
is a set.Let
and
be digital images. We will use the notation
to denote the composition
. Thus the statement that the triangle
is equivalent to the statement that
. When morphisms
and
exist such that the above triangle commutes, we say that
factor through
. Similarly the statement that the square
commutes means that
.Proposition 3.1. Let
be a digital category and
is a
object such that
is a digital image. Then there exist exactly one
morphism
satisfiying the properties 3(a) and 3(b) of Definition 3.1; i.e. such that (a)
whenever
is defined, and(b)
whenever
is defined;Proof: Suppose that each of
and
is such a morphism. Then by (a)
and by (b)
; hence,
.Definition 3.2. For each object
of the digital category
, the unique
morphism
satishfiying (a) and (b) above is denoted by
and is called the
identity of
.Definition 3.3. A digital category
is said to be:(1) Small provided that
is a digital set;(2) Discrete provided that all of its morphisms are identities;(3) Connected that for each pair
of
objects,
.
and
can be considered to be digital categories, but neither
nor
can be digital categories.Definition 3.4. For each natural number
, the set
supplied with the usual order can be considered to be digital category
, thus we have the special small digital categories:
The empty category

Boxer defined the path homotopy in [5]. We can consider equivalence classes of digital paths (path homotopy classes) because digital path homotopy relation is an equivalence relation.Example 3.2. Given a digital image
and points
a digital
path from
to
is a
continuous mapping
from some digital set
to
with
and
If
is a digital path from
to
and
is a digital path from
to
, there is a path
defined by
from
to
.This makes
into a category, the digital path category of
.Now given digital paths
, both from
to
.There is a digital continuous mapping
in a digital image in such that
It easy to see that this is an equivalence relation. The quotient of the digital path category by this congruence relation is a category called the digital category of digital homotopy classes of digital paths in
.Definition 3.5. Let
be a digital category and
digital digital sets. A digital morphism
in
said to be monic if it is left cancelable.Theorem 3.1. Suppose that
be digital sets. Consider the following ‘cube’ of digital objects and digital morphisms in a given digital category
:
(i) Suppose that all faces except the top face are given to be commutative. If
is monic, then the top face is also commutative.(ii) Suppose that all faces except the bottom face are given to be commutative. If
is epic, then the bottom face is also commutative.Proof: Let
denote the digital morphism from
to
. We have to prove that
. Now
is given to be monic and (writing
as juxtaposition)
Then the result follows by left cancellation of
.ii) We have to prove that
[1,5] is given to be epic and
Then the result follows by right cancellation of
Example 3.3.Given a digital image
and points
a digital
path from
to
is a
continuous mapping
from some digital set
to
with
and
. If
is a digital path from
to
and
is a digital path from
to
there is a path
defined by
from
to
. This makes
into a category the digital path category of
. Now given digital paths
, both from
to
, one can define
if there is a continuous map 
in
such that 
4. Conclusions
In this paper we construct the digital category model for digital images and gave some conditions made the diagram commutative.
References
[1] | T.S. Blyth, Categories, Longman. |
[2] | K. Borsuk, Theory of Retracts, Polish Scientific Publishers: Warsaw, 1967. |
[3] | L. Boxer, Digitally continuous functions, Pattern Recognition Letters Vol. 15 (1994) 833–839. |
[4] | L. Boxer, A classical construction for the digital fundamental group, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Vol. 10 (1999) 51–62,. |
[5] | L. Boxer, Properties of Digital Homotopy, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Vol. 22 (2005) 19–26. |
[6] | H. Herlich and G.E. Strecker, Category Theory, Allyn and Bacon Inc, Boston. |
[7] | G.T. Herman, Oriented surfaces in digital spaces, CVGIP:Graphical Models and Image Processing Vol. 55 (1993) 381–396. |
[8] | I. Karaca, L. Boxer and A. Öztel, Topological Invariants in Digital Images, Jour. of Mathematical Sciences: Advances and Applications, 11(2011) No 2, 109-140 |
[9] | I. Karaca and L. Boxer., Some Properties of Digital Covering Spaces, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 37(2010), 17-26. |
[10] | I. Karaca and L. Boxer., The Classification of Digital Covering Spaces, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 32(2008), 23-29. |
[11] | E. Khalimsky, Motion, deformation, and homotopy in finite spaces, in Proceedings IEEE Intl. Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (1987) 227–234. |
[12] | T.Y. Kong, A digital fundamental group Computers and Graphics Vol. 13 (1989) 159–166. |
[13] | T.Y. Kong, A.W. Roscoe, and A. Rosenfeld, Concepts of digital topology, Topology and its Applications, Vol. 46 (1992) 219–262. |
[14] | R. Malgouyres, Homotopy in 2-dimensional digital images, Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 230 (2000) 221–233. |
[15] | W.S. Massey, Algebraic Topology: An Introduction, Harcourt, Brace, and World: New York, 1967. |
[16] | J.R. Munkres, Topology A First Course,Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1975. |
[17] | A. Mutlu, B. Mutlu, S. Öztunç, On Digital Homotopy of Digital Paths, Research Journal of Pure Algebra, 2(6), 2012, 147-154. |
[18] | J. van Oostain, Basic Category Theory, Utrecht University Lecture Notes, 2002. |
[19] | A. Rosenfeld, Continuous’ functions on digital pictures, Pattern Recognition Letters Vol. 4 (1986) 177–184. |
[20] | Q.F. Stout, Topological matching, in Proc. 15th Annual Symp. on Theory of Computing (1983) 24–31. |