G. M. Moatimid , M.H.M. Moussa , Rehab M. El-Shiekh , A. A. El-Satar 
                    
                        Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, Hiliopolis, Cairo, Egypt
                    
                    
                    
                        Correspondence to: A. A. El-Satar , Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, Hiliopolis, Cairo, Egypt.
| Email:  |   | 
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                        Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
                    
                    
                    
                        Abstract
                    
                        In this paper, Lie-Group method is applied to the b-family equations which includes two important nonlinear partial differential equations Camassa--Holm (CH) equation and the Degasperis--Procesi (DP) equation. The complete Lie algebra of infinitesimal symmetries is established. Three nonequivalent sub-algebras of the complete Lie algebra are used to investigate similarity solutions and similarity reductions in the form of nonlinear ordinary equations (ODEs) for the b-family equations. The generalized He's Exp-Function method is used to drive exact solutions for the reduced nonlinear ODEs, some figures are given to show the properties of the solutions.
                    
                    
                    
                    
                        Keywords: 
                        Similarity Reductions, Lie-Group Method, Exact Solution
                    
		    
		    
                    
		    
                        
1. Introduction
In this paper we consider the following b-family of equations[1]  | (1.1) | 
 where b is a dimensionless constant. The quadratic terms in Eq. (1) represent the competition, or balance, in fluid convection between nonlinear transport and amplification due to b-dimensional stretching[2-3]. On the other hand, in a recent study of soliton equations, it was found that for any b≠-1, Eq. (1) was included in the family of shallow water equations at quadratic order accuracy that are asymptotically equivalent under Kodama transformations[4].Degasperis and Procesi[5] showed that the family of equations (1) cannot be integrable unless b=2 or b=3 by using the method of asymptotic integrability. The previous two values of b are corresponding to two important equations the Camassa--Holm (CH) equation and the Degasperis-- Procesi (DP) equation respectively. The CH and the DP equations are bi-Hamiltonian and have an associated isospectral problem, therefore they are both formally integrable[6-9]. Moreover, both equations admit peaked solitary wave solutions and present similarities although they are truly different[10-13].
2. Solution of the Problem
Firstly, we shall derive the similarity solutions using the Lie group method[14] under which Eq. (1.1) is invariant in the following steps:1- Lie point symmetries  | (2.1) | 
With associated infinitesimal form  |    (2.2) | 
2- If we set  | (2.3) | 
Then the invariance condition  |  (2.4) | 
where 
 is given by  |  (2.5) | 
where  | (2.6) | 
The components  |  (2.7) | 
can be determined from the following expressions:  |  (2.8) | 
Eq. (2.4) gives the following system of linear partial differential equations:  | (2.9) | 
3- The general solution of Eqs. (2.9) provides following forms for the infinitesimal element ζ,η and φ:  |   (2.10) | 
where c1,c2 and c3are arbitrary constant.4- In order to study the group theoretic structure, the vector field operator V is written as  |  (2.11) | 
where  |   (2.12) | 
It is easy to verify the vector fields are closed under the Lie bracket as follows:
Furthermore, we can compute the adjoint representations of the vector fields 
From the previous adjoint representations we have the following three non-equivalent possibilities of sub-algebras of the Lie algebra (I) V1+V3.(II) V2+V3.(III) V1.Now we could determine the similarity variables and similarity reduction corresponding each vector field using the auxiliary equation  |   (2.13) | 
3. Similarity Reduction and Exact   Solutions
In this section, the primary focus is on the reductions association with the vector fields (I-III) and attempt to some exact solutions:Vector field V1+V3For this vector field, on using the characterstic Eq. (2.13), the similarity variable and the form of similarity solution is as follows:  | (3.1) | 
On using these in Eq. (1.1), the reduced ODE is given  |   (3.2) | 
where prime (′) denotes the differentiation with respect to the variable ξ. On transforming the independent variable by the relation ξ=exp(τ) Eq. (3.2) becomes  |  (3.3) | 
where dot denotes the defferentiation with respect to variable τ. In view of the generalized He's Exp-Function method[15], we assume that the solution of Eq. (3.3) can be expressed in the form  | (3.4) | 
where c, d, p and q are positive integers which are unknown to be further determined, an and rm are unknown constants. In addition, φ(τ) satisfies Riccati equation,  |  (3.5) | 
In order to determine values of c and p, we balance the linear term of the highest order in Eq. (3.3), we have  |        (3.6) | 
  |   (3.7) | 
where ai and ri are determined coefficients only for simplicity. From balancing the lowest order and highest order of φ (3.6) and (3.7), we obtain  |  (3.8) | 
which leads to the limit  |   (3.9) | 
and  |  (3.10) | 
which leads to the limit  |  (3.11) | 
For simplicity, we set p = c = 1, the trial function, Eq. (3.4), becomes  |  (3.12) | 
Substituting Eq. (3.12) into Eq. (3.3), equating to zero the coefficients of all powers of φ(τ) yields a set of algebraic equations for a₀, r₀, a0, r1, a-1 and r-1 . Solving the system of algebraic equations with the aid of Maple, where A=
, B=0, C=
 in Eq.(2.18), we obtain the following results: 
b is arbitrarySubstituting the results of case I into (3.12), the solutions of Eq.(1.1) can be written as:  | (3.13) | 
where
.Vector field V2+V3For this generator the associated similarity variable and similarity solution are given by:  |  (3.14) | 
On using these in Eq. (1.1), the reduced ODE is given by   |    (3.15) | 
Be using the ansatz (3.14), the solution of Eq. (1.1) can be writen as:
  |    (3.16) | 
where 
Vector field V1The generator (III) in the optimal system defines the similarity variable and similarity solution as follows:  |  (3.17) | 
On using these in Eq. (1.1), the reduced ODE is given by  | (3.18) | 
Using the ansatz (3.14), we have the following solutions:
  | (3.19) | 
where 
4. Conclusions
In summary, we have utilized this method to construct new exact solutions for b-family equations. In solutions (3.13) and (3.19) there is singularity at t=0, so we put t≻0 in figures. All solutions have been obtained in this paper for the b-family equations are also solutions for the CH and DP equations because those solutions were not restricted with any value of b.  | Figure 1.  solution of u1 (x,t) in (26), where k=1 | 
  | Figure 2.  solution u1 (x,t) in (29), where k=1 | 
  | Figure 3.  solution u1 (x,t) in (29), where k=1 | 
  | Figure 4.  solution u1 (x,t) in (32), where k=1 | 
                     
                    
                        
                            References
                            
                        
                        | [1]   | A. Degasperis, D.D. Holm, A.N.W. Hone, Theoret. and Math. Phys. 133 (2002) 170-183. | 
| [2]   | A. Degasperis, D.D. Holm, A.N.W. Hone, II (Gallipoli, 2002), 37.43, World Sci. Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 2003. | 
| [3]   | H.R. Dullin, G.A. Gottwald, D.D. Holm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2002) 4501. 4504. | 
| [4]   | Degasperis A and Procesi M, Rome, December 1998, World Scienti.c, River Edge, NJ, 1999, 23-37. | 
| [5]   | Camassa R and Holm D, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993), 1661-1664. | 
| [6]   | Constantin A, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A - Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 457 (2001), 953.970. | 
| [7]   | Constantin A and McKean H P, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 52 (1999), 949.982. | 
| [8]   | Lenells J, J. Non-linear Math. Phys. 9 (2002), 389.393. | 
| [9]   | Fuchssteiner B and Fokas A S, Phys. D 4 (1981), 47.66. | 
| [10]   | Constantin A and Molinet L, Comm. Math. Phys. 211 (2000), 45.61. | 
| [11]   | Constantin A and Strauss W, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 53 (2000), 603-610. | 
| [12]   | Octavian G Mustafa. Non linear Math. Phys.12 (1) (2005)10-14. | 
| [13]   | P.J. Olver, New York (1986). | 
| [14]   | A. El-Halim Ebaid, znaturforsch, 2009 |