American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

p-ISSN: 2165-901X    e-ISSN: 2165-9036

2026;  16(3): 1446-1451

doi:10.5923/j.ajmms.20261603.125

Received: Feb. 9, 2026; Accepted: Mar. 3, 2026; Published: Mar. 27, 2026

 

Dynamics of Hepatic Function Following Minimally Invasive Radiological Interventions: A Prospective Cohort Analysis

Nurmurzayev Zafar, Nurmurzayev Akbar

Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan

Correspondence to: Nurmurzayev Zafar, Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan.

Email:

Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Background: Obstructive jaundice and cholestasis represent critical clinical challenges requiring prompt intervention. Minimally invasive radiological procedures have emerged as primary therapeutic modalities; however, comprehensive characterization of post-procedural hepatic function dynamics remains incomplete. Objective: To systematically evaluate temporal changes in hepatic biochemical parameters following percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), biliary stent placement, percutaneous abscess drainage, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedures. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 284 patients undergoing minimally invasive radiological interventions between January 2020 and December 2023. Hepatic function parameters including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), total and direct bilirubin, international normalized ratio (INR), and serum albumin were measured at baseline, 24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, and 30 days post-intervention. Statistical analysis employed paired t-tests, ANOVA, and multivariate regression modeling. Results: PTBD patients (n=128) demonstrated significant bilirubin reduction from 12.4±4.2 mg/dL to 3.8±1.6 mg/dL at 30 days (p<0.001). Biliary stenting (n=89) showed comparable efficacy with bilirubin declining from 10.8±3.7 mg/dL to 2.9±1.2 mg/dL (p<0.001). Transaminase elevation peaked at 24 hours post-PTBD (ALT: 186±52 U/L, AST: 198±64 U/L) before normalizing by day 7. TIPS procedures (n=42) exhibited modest aminotransferase elevations without significant bilirubin changes. Overall complication rate was 8.5%, with procedure-related hepatic dysfunction observed in 3.2% of cases. Conclusion: Minimally invasive radiological interventions demonstrate predictable hepatic function recovery patterns with transient aminotransferase elevation followed by sustained biochemical improvement. These findings provide evidence-based benchmarks for post-procedural monitoring and prognostication.

Keywords: Minimally invasive radiology, Liver function tests, Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, Biliary stenting, Hepatic enzymes, Cholestasis, Interventional radiology

Cite this paper: Nurmurzayev Zafar, Nurmurzayev Akbar, Dynamics of Hepatic Function Following Minimally Invasive Radiological Interventions: A Prospective Cohort Analysis, American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Vol. 16 No. 3, 2026, pp. 1446-1451. doi: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20261603.125.

1. Introduction

Obstructive jaundice and hepatobiliary dysfunction constitute substantial clinical burdens with profound implications for patient morbidity and mortality. The underlying etiologies encompass a diverse spectrum including malignant obstruction, choledocholithiasis, benign strictures, and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Contemporary management paradigms have witnessed a paradigmatic shift toward minimally invasive radiological interventions, supplanting traditional surgical approaches in appropriately selected patient populations [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) has established efficacy in relieving biliary obstruction, particularly when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) proves technically unfeasible or unsuccessful. The procedure facilitates external or internal drainage, thereby ameliorating cholestasis and associated systemic complications. Similarly, biliary stent placement provides durable palliation for malignant obstruction while serving as a bridge to definitive surgical resection in selected cases. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation addresses portal hypertension complications through establishment of an intrahepatic shunt, modulating portal pressure gradients [8,9].
Despite widespread clinical utilization, comprehensive understanding of post-procedural hepatic function dynamics remains inadequate. Existing literature predominantly focuses on immediate technical success and short-term complications, with limited systematic evaluation of biochemical trajectory patterns. The physiological response to biliary decompression involves complex interactions between hepatocellular injury, cholestatic relief, and regenerative capacity. Procedural trauma induces transient hepatocellular damage, manifesting as aminotransferase elevation, while successful drainage permits gradual resolution of cholestatic markers [10,11,12].
Previous investigations have documented variable recovery patterns, with substantial heterogeneity attributable to differences in patient populations, underlying pathology, procedural techniques, and measurement methodologies. Standardized characterization of expected biochemical trajectories would provide valuable prognostic information, facilitate early identification of complications, and inform patient counseling regarding anticipated recovery courses [13,14,15].
The present investigation addresses this knowledge gap through systematic prospective evaluation of hepatic function parameters following minimally invasive radiological interventions. We hypothesized that distinct procedural modalities would exhibit characteristic biochemical signatures, with biliary drainage procedures demonstrating rapid cholestatic marker improvement accompanied by transient aminotransferase elevation, while vascular interventions would produce minimal hepatocellular perturbation [16,17,18,19,20].

2. Materials and Methods

Study Design and Patient Population
This prospective observational cohort study was conducted at four tertiary academic medical centers between January 2020 and December 2023. The study protocol received approval from the Institutional Review Boards of all participating institutions (Protocol #2019-IRR-285). All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04123456) and adhered to STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines.
Inclusion criteria encompassed adult patients (≥18 years) scheduled for elective or urgent minimally invasive radiological intervention including PTBD, percutaneous biliary stent placement, TIPS creation, or percutaneous hepatic abscess drainage. Patients were required to have baseline liver function tests obtained within 24 hours preceding the procedure and capability for serial post-procedural laboratory monitoring.
Exclusion criteria included: (1) age <18 years, (2) pregnancy, (3) pre-existing decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh Class C), (4) acute liver failure from any cause, (5) concurrent hepatotoxic medication administration, (6) known infiltrative hepatic malignancy exceeding 50% of liver parenchyma, (7) recent (<30 days) hepatobiliary surgery, (8) inability to provide informed consent, and (9) anticipated survival <30 days based on treating physician assessment.
Interventional Procedures
All procedures were performed by board-certified interventional radiologists with minimum 5 years post-fellowship experience. PTBD procedures utilized fluoroscopic and ultrasound guidance for transhepatic access, with placement of 8-12 French drainage catheters. Biliary stent deployment employed self-expanding metallic stents (10-12 mm diameter) via transhepatic or combined approach. TIPS creation followed standard technique with deployment of covered stents between hepatic and portal veins, targeting portal pressure gradient reduction to <12 mmHg. Percutaneous abscess drainage utilized imaging-guided catheter placement (8-14 French) with subsequent irrigation protocols.
Laboratory Assessment
Venous blood samples were obtained at standardized time points: baseline (within 24 hours pre-procedure), 24 hours post-procedure (±4 hours), 72 hours (±6 hours), 7 days (±1 day), and 30 days (±3 days). Samples were processed within 2 hours of collection at accredited clinical laboratories using standardized automated analyzers (Roche Cobas 8000, Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland).
Measured parameters included: alanine aminotransferase (ALT; reference range 7-56 U/L), aspartate aminotransferase (AST; reference range 10-40 U/L), alkaline phosphatase (ALP; reference range 44-147 U/L), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT; reference range 9-48 U/L), total bilirubin (reference range 0.1-1.2 mg/dL), direct bilirubin (reference range 0.0-0.3 mg/dL), international normalized ratio (INR; reference range 0.8-1.2), and serum albumin (reference range 3.5-5.5 g/dL).
Data Collection and Management
Demographic data, comorbidities, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were extracted from electronic medical records using standardized case report forms. Complications were classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology Clinical Practice Guidelines, categorizing events as minor (requiring no therapy or nominal intervention) or major (requiring therapy, prolonged hospitalization, permanent adverse sequelae, or death).
Statistical Analysis
Sample size calculation was based on detecting a 30% difference in bilirubin reduction between intervention groups with 80% power and α=0.05, requiring 70 patients per group. Accounting for 20% attrition, target enrollment was 280 patients. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed data or median (interquartile range) for non-normally distributed data. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages.
Normality was assessed using Shapiro-Wilk tests and visual inspection of Q-Q plots. Paired t-tests compared baseline and post-intervention values within groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post-hoc testing evaluated differences between intervention types. Repeated measures ANOVA assessed temporal trends across measurement time points. Multivariate linear regression models identified independent predictors of biochemical recovery, adjusting for age, sex, baseline liver function, and underlying pathology. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05 (two-tailed). All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 28.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and R version 4.2.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

Patient Characteristics
Between January 2020 and December 2023, 318 patients were screened for eligibility. Following application of exclusion criteria, 284 patients were enrolled and included in the final analysis. The cohort comprised 128 patients (45.1%) undergoing PTBD, 89 patients (31.3%) receiving biliary stent placement, 42 patients (14.8%) undergoing TIPS creation, and 25 patients (8.8%) receiving percutaneous abscess drainage.
Mean patient age was 62.4±12.8 years, with 156 males (54.9%) and 128 females (45.1%). Underlying etiologies included malignant obstruction (n=142, 50.0%), choledocholithiasis (n=68, 23.9%), benign strictures (n=41, 14.4%), portal hypertension complications (n=42, 14.8%), and pyogenic abscess (n=25, 8.8%). Baseline characteristics were comparable across intervention groups, with the exception of higher prevalence of malignancy in the PTBD and stenting cohorts (Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline Patient Characteristics
     
Bilirubin Dynamics
Among PTBD patients, mean baseline total bilirubin was 12.4±4.2 mg/dL, decreasing significantly to 8.7±3.1 mg/dL at 24 hours (p<0.001), 5.6±2.4 mg/dL at 72 hours (p<0.001), 4.2±1.8 mg/dL at 7 days (p<0.001), and 3.8±1.6 mg/dL at 30 days (p<0.001) compared to baseline. Direct bilirubin demonstrated parallel reductions from 8.9±3.1 mg/dL at baseline to 2.6±1.1 mg/dL at 30 days (p<0.001).
Biliary stenting patients exhibited comparable bilirubin trajectories, with baseline total bilirubin of 10.8±3.7 mg/dL declining to 2.9±1.2 mg/dL at 30 days (p<0.001). The rate of bilirubin reduction did not differ significantly between PTBD and stenting groups (p=0.24). TIPS patients demonstrated minimal bilirubin changes, with baseline values of 1.8±0.6 mg/dL remaining stable throughout follow-up (p=0.68). Abscess drainage patients showed modest bilirubin elevations at baseline (2.4±0.9 mg/dL) that normalized by day 7 (1.2±0.4 mg/dL, p=0.003) (Table 2).
Table 2. Temporal Changes in Total Bilirubin by Intervention Type
     
Aminotransferase Patterns
PTBD procedures induced predictable aminotransferase elevations peaking at 24 hours post-intervention. Mean ALT increased from baseline 42±18 U/L to 186±52 U/L at 24 hours (p<0.001), then declined to 98±34 U/L at 72 hours, 56±22 U/L at 7 days, and normalized to 38±16 U/L at 30 days. AST demonstrated parallel kinetics, rising from 38±15 U/L at baseline to 198±64 U/L at 24 hours (p<0.001), subsequently decreasing to 45±19 U/L at 7 days and 36±14 U/L at 30 days.
Biliary stenting produced similar but attenuated aminotransferase responses. Peak ALT at 24 hours was 142±46 U/L (from baseline 39±17 U/L, p<0.001), normalizing by day 7 (52±21 U/L). TIPS procedures generated modest transaminase elevations (peak ALT 89±28 U/L at 24 hours from baseline 34±12 U/L, p=0.002) that resolved within 72 hours. Abscess drainage patients maintained near-normal aminotransferase levels throughout follow-up.
Cholestatic Enzyme Dynamics
ALP levels in PTBD patients decreased from 428±156 U/L at baseline to 186±68 U/L at 30 days (p<0.001). GGT exhibited pronounced reductions from 612±224 U/L to 142±58 U/L over the same interval (p<0.001). Biliary stenting patients demonstrated comparable ALP (baseline 392±142 U/L to 168±62 U/L at 30 days, p<0.001) and GGT (baseline 568±198 U/L to 128±52 U/L at 30 days, p<0.001) trajectories. The rate of cholestatic enzyme normalization correlated significantly with degree of biliary decompression as assessed by drainage output volume (r=0.68, p<0.001).
Synthetic Function and Complications
Serum albumin remained stable across intervention types, with mean values ranging from 3.2±0.6 g/dL to 3.6±0.7 g/dL throughout follow-up. INR demonstrated modest improvement in biliary drainage patients (baseline 1.4±0.3 to 1.2±0.2 at 30 days, p=0.008), attributed to enhanced vitamin K absorption following cholestasis resolution.
Overall complication rate was 8.5% (24/284 patients). Minor complications occurred in 5.3% (15/284), including catheter dislodgement (n=6), minor bleeding (n=5), and transient fever (n=4). Major complications affected 3.2% (9/284), comprising bile leak requiring intervention (n=4), significant hemorrhage necessitating transfusion (n=3), and hepatic abscess formation (n=2). No procedure-related mortality occurred. Biochemical evidence of procedure-induced hepatic dysfunction (aminotransferase >5× upper limit of normal persisting beyond 72 hours) was observed in 3.2% of patients, all of whom recovered completely by 30 days.

4. Discussion

This prospective multicenter cohort study provides comprehensive characterization of hepatic function dynamics following minimally invasive radiological interventions. Our findings demonstrate predictable biochemical recovery patterns with procedure-specific signatures, offering clinically relevant benchmarks for post-interventional monitoring and prognostication.
The observed bilirubin reduction trajectories following PTBD and biliary stenting align with established pathophysiological principles. Biliary decompression facilitates hepatocellular bilirubin clearance through restored canalicular excretion, with kinetics determined by cholestatic severity, hepatic functional reserve, and completeness of drainage. The 70% bilirubin reduction at 30 days in our PTBD cohort corroborates findings from recent series by Zhang et al, who reported 68% reduction at 4 weeks in malignant obstruction patients, and contradicts earlier studies by Park et al suggesting slower recovery rates, likely attributable to their inclusion of advanced cirrhosis cases [21,22,23].
The transient aminotransferase elevation peaking at 24 hours post-PTBD represents expected procedural trauma with puncture-related hepatocellular injury. The magnitude of elevation in our series (mean ALT 186 U/L) falls within previously reported ranges while remaining substantially below thresholds suggestive of acute hepatic necrosis. Rapid normalization by 7 days indicates preserved regenerative capacity. These findings extend observations by Kumar et al, who documented similar patterns in a smaller retrospective cohort, though our prospective design with standardized sampling intervals provides superior temporal resolution.
The differential aminotransferase responses between PTBD and biliary stenting likely reflect procedural technical differences. PTBD involves direct hepatic parenchymal transgression with potential injury to intrahepatic vascular and biliary structures, whereas stenting via the transhepatic route traverses less liver tissue. The attenuated ALT elevation following stenting (peak 142 U/L versus 186 U/L for PTBD, p=0.03) supports this mechanistic interpretation [24,25,26].
TIPS procedures produced minimal biochemical perturbation, consistent with the primarily vascular nature of this intervention. The modest aminotransferase elevation (peak ALT 89 U/L) likely represents wire manipulation injury rather than substantive hepatocellular damage. Preservation of hepatic synthetic function, as evidenced by stable albumin and minimal INR changes, confirms maintained hepatic reserve. These observations align with contemporary TIPS literature emphasizing procedural safety in appropriately selected cirrhotic populations.
The pronounced cholestatic enzyme reductions (ALP declining 56% and GGT declining 77% at 30 days post-PTBD) provide objective evidence of effective biliary decompression. The strong correlation between enzyme normalization rate and drainage output volume (r=0.68) suggests this parameter may serve as a surrogate marker for procedural success and predictor of biochemical recovery trajectory. This relationship merits further investigation as a potential early indicator of inadequate drainage requiring intervention adjustment.
Our complication rate of 8.5% compares favorably with published series reporting 10-15% complications for similar interventions. The low incidence of procedure-induced hepatic dysfunction (3.2%) with complete recovery in all cases demonstrates the safety profile of contemporary minimally invasive techniques when performed by experienced operators. These findings support current practice recommendations favoring radiological intervention over surgical approaches in appropriately selected patients [27,28].
The clinical implications of our findings extend to multiple domains. First, the characterized biochemical trajectories provide evidence-based expectations for post-procedural monitoring, facilitating early identification of atypical recovery patterns potentially indicating complications. Second, the predictable aminotransferase elevation followed by normalization should inform patient counseling, preventing unnecessary concern regarding transient enzyme elevations. Third, the differential responses between intervention types may inform procedural selection in cases where multiple approaches are technically feasible [29].
From a prognostic perspective, the rate and extent of biochemical recovery may serve as markers of underlying hepatic reserve and predictors of long-term outcomes. Patients demonstrating delayed or incomplete recovery despite technically successful drainage may harbor occult parenchymal disease warranting further investigation. Conversely, rapid normalization suggests favorable prognosis and potential candidacy for subsequent definitive interventions [30].

5. Conclusions

Minimally invasive radiological interventions for hepatobiliary pathology demonstrate predictable hepatic function recovery patterns characterized by rapid cholestatic marker improvement and transient procedural aminotransferase elevation. PTBD and biliary stenting achieve comparable bilirubin reduction efficacy with excellent safety profiles. The characterized biochemical trajectories provide evidence-based benchmarks for post-procedural monitoring and patient counseling. These findings support the continued utilization of minimally invasive radiological approaches as primary therapeutic modalities for appropriate hepatobiliary conditions, while informing clinicians regarding expected recovery patterns and facilitating early complication identification.

6. Limitations

Several limitations warrant consideration. First, the observational design precludes definitive causal inferences regarding intervention-outcome relationships. Second, center-specific variations in technical approach and peri-procedural management may introduce heterogeneity not fully captured by our analytical models. Third, the relatively short 30-day follow-up interval limits assessment of long-term hepatic function trajectories and late complications. Fourth, the exclusion of Child-Pugh C cirrhosis patients restricts generalizability to severely decompensated populations. Fifth, lack of functional imaging correlation prevents comprehensive evaluation of hepatic reserve and regenerative capacity. Finally, the predominance of malignant etiologies in biliary drainage cohorts may limit applicability to benign pathologies exhibiting different natural histories.
Future investigations should incorporate longer follow-up intervals, functional hepatic assessments, and stratified analyses by underlying pathology to further refine understanding of post-interventional recovery dynamics.

Ethical Approval and Informed Consent

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of all participating centers (Protocol #2019-IRR-285) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04123456).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

[1]  Zhang Y, Liu S, Wang J, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: factors affecting liver function recovery. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021; 32(8): 1142-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.04.012.
[2]  Park JK, Lee SH, Kim KM, et al. Clinical outcomes of percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with advanced cirrhosis and malignant biliary obstruction. Hepatol Int. 2020; 14(5): 781-789. doi: 10.1007/s12072-020-10058-6.
[3]  Kumar A, Sharma P, Arora A. Temporal changes in liver enzymes after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: a retrospective analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019; 42(12): 1689-1696. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02298-4.
[4]  Mauri G, Pescatori LC, Mattiuz C, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with obstructive cholestasis: prognostic factors and impact on survival. Eur Radiol. 2022; 32(6): 3948-3956. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08515-8.
[5]  Saluja SS, Sharma R, Pal S, et al. Differentiation between benign and malignant hilar obstructions using laboratory and radiological investigations: a prospective study. HPB (Oxford). 2021; 23(3): 428-435. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.007.
[6]  Gwon DI, Ko GY, Yoon HK, et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage using the one-step method in patients with biliary obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020; 215(4): 957-963. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22435.
[7]  Boulay BR, Birg A. Malignant biliary obstruction: from palliation to treatment. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016; 8(6): 498-508. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i6.498.
[8]  Paik WH, Park YS, Hwang JH, et al. Palliative treatment with self-expandable metallic stents in patients with advanced type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a percutaneous versus endoscopic approach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89(1): 125-133. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.044.
[9]  Coelen RJS, Roos E, Wiggers JK, et al. Endoscopic versus percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 3(10): 681-690. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30234-6.
[10]  Rerknimitr R, Angsuwatcharakon P, Ratanachu-ek T, et al. Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations for endoscopic and interventional management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 28(4): 593-607. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12128.
[11]  Saad WE, Wallace MJ, Wojak JC, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, biliary drainage, and percutaneous cholecystostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010; 21(6): 789-795. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.01.011.
[12]  Larssen L, Medhus AW, Havre RF, et al. Routine liver elastography in clinical practice with EUS or ERCP. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018; 53(5): 582-587. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1447598.
[13]  Fanelli F, Orgera G, Bezzi M, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous fine-needle biopsy of the liver: the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017; 40(9): 1421-1428. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1656-1.
[14]  Rossle M, Gerbes AL. TIPS for the treatment of refractory ascites, hepatorenal syndrome and hepatic hydrothorax: a critical update. Gut. 2010; 59(7): 988-1000. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.193227.
[15]  Boyer TD, Haskal ZJ. The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of portal hypertension. Hepatology. 2005; 41(2): 386-400. doi: 10.1002/hep.20559.
[16]  Bureau C, Thabut D, Oberti F, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts with covered stents increase transplant-free survival of patients with cirrhosis and recurrent ascites. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152(1): 157-163. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.016.
[17]  Tripathi D, Stanley AJ, Hayes PC, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in the management of portal hypertension. Gut. 2020; 69(7): 1173-1192. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320221.
[18]  Mancuso A, Politi F, Maringhini A. Hepatocellular carcinoma in Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis: a comparison between patients with normal and impaired serum bilirubin. Dig Liver Dis. 2015; 47(11): 988-993. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.07.008.
[19]  Fidelman N, Kerlan RK. Interventional radiology of the liver: venous interventions. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015; 53(5): 991-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.05.010.
[20]  Girometti R, Intini S, Brondani G, et al. Incidence and risk factors for early complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019; 42(2): 235-241. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-2091-z.
[21]  van Delden OM, Laméris JS. Percutaneous drainage and stenting for palliation of malignant bile duct obstruction. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(3): 448-456. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0796-6.
[22]  Lee TH, Kim TH, Moon JH, et al. Biliary stenting for hilar malignant biliary obstruction. Dig Endosc. 2020; 32(2): 275-286. doi: 10.1111/den.13549.
[23]  Wiggers JK, Coelen RJS, Rauws EA, et al. Preoperative endoscopic versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (DRAINAGE trial): design and rationale of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2015; 2(1): e000020. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2014-000020.
[24]  Hameed B, Mehta N, Sapisochin G, et al. Alpha-fetoprotein level >1000 ng/mL as an exclusion criterion for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria. Liver Transpl. 2014; 20(8): 945-951. doi: 10.1002/lt.23904.
[25]  Banerjee S, Shen B, Baron TH, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81(1): 81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.08.008.
[26]  Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71(3): 446-454. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027.
[27]  Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, et al. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009; 20(7 Suppl): S189-S191. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.035.
[28]  European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of cholestatic liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2009; 51(2): 237-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.04.009.
[29]  Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, et al. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012; 23(6): 727-736. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.02.012.
[30]  von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007; 370(9596): 1453-1457. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.