American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

p-ISSN: 2165-901X    e-ISSN: 2165-9036

2024;  14(10): 2602-2607

doi:10.5923/j.ajmms.20241410.33

Received: Sep. 7, 2024; Accepted: Oct. 2, 2024; Published: Oct. 23, 2024

 

Reconstruction of Zygomatic Orbital Fractures with Titanium Micromesh: Literature Review

Boymurodov Shukhrat Abduzhalilovich1, Yusupov Shokhrukh Shukhratovich2, Iminov Komiljon Odiljonovich3

1Professor, Head of Department of Maxilla Facial Surgery and Dentistry, Tashkent Medical Academy, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

2Senior Lecturer, Department of Maxilla Facial Surgery and Dentistry, Tashkent Medical Academy, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

3Assistant, Department of Maxilla Facial Surgery and Dentistry, Tashkent Medical Academy, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Over the past few decades, the incidence of injuries in the world population, including in Central Asia countries, the number has increased quantitatively. Trauma to the zygomatic-orbital complex in facial fractures has one of the most common manifestations. At the crossroads of many clinical disciplines - mainly maxillofacial surgery, neurology, neurosurgery, ENT and ophthalmology - a complex problem of diagnosis and treatment of various traumatic complications of facial fractures, which requires a correct and minimally invasive solutions. The implementation of the main practical actions by specialists of different profiles of maxillafacial surgery is carried out only within the framework of a scheduled consultation (neurologist, ophthalmologist, ENT doctor) with a clearly expressed clinical picture. In this variant, the number of cases in the case where the severity of trauma orbital complex is not considered at all and the clinical symptoms of damage to the orbital complex more severe symptoms.

Keywords: Zygomatic orbital complex, Fractures, Titanium mesh, Reconstruction, Artificial intelligence, Diagnostics, Orbital trauma, Periorbital muscle and nerve, NVIDIA MONAI

Cite this paper: Boymurodov Shukhrat Abduzhalilovich, Yusupov Shokhrukh Shukhratovich, Iminov Komiljon Odiljonovich, Reconstruction of Zygomatic Orbital Fractures with Titanium Micromesh: Literature Review, American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Vol. 14 No. 10, 2024, pp. 2602-2607. doi: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20241410.33.

1. Introduction

Anatomical features of the zygomaticoorbital complex (ZOC) and severe injuries of the head and bones of the facial skeleton, representing a significant threat to human health and life, leading to many cases of severe disability of patients [1,4,6]. Whole cases, the patients with these types of injuries are classified as severe or heavy, because face skeletal bones are often injured the brain structures, damage to visual acuity organs and auricular disorders. The periorbital containing damage to the nerve and arterial supplying of eyeball, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with injuries of the zygomatic-orbital complex has some clinical and anatomical features [2,5,7]. In most cases, the diagnosis of pathological changes generated in the bonded orbital composite of the midface area. However, literary data and our own observation results indicate that past injuries can have a serious effect on serious long -term results. It leads to the early symptoms of ophthalmology disorders, including periorbital muscle and nerve systems, and the structure surrounding it [3,8,10]. Therefore, further research and studies are clearly needed on the diagnostic characteristics, course and clinical complications of traumatic injuries of the zygomatic-orbital complex, utilizing modern objective diagnostic tools in the research process, followed by an evaluation of post-traumatic complications [13,14,15]. According to several authors the proportion of (ZOC) fractures in the total number of bone lesions varies from 3,2-11%±1,4. However, in 88.2% of cases, only fractures of the facial skeleton were observed, soft tissue injuries in only 9.9% and after facial burns in 1.9%. on the other hand, other authors in the depressing majority of patients with ZOC fractures are observed from 88.3-93.6%±2,6 and lesions of isolated soft tissues 6.4-9.8%±1,7 all injuries. Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used for the diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis of pure orbital fractures of the orbital floor and medial wall [9,11,12].
The purpose of this study was to systematically review the current literature to establish an overview artificial intelligent facilities of computer tomography diagnosis and CT parameters associated with treatment choice and clinical (long-term) outcome in surgically and conservatively treated patients with zygomatic orbital fractures. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Databases were searched using the terms "orbital fracture", "computed tomography", “artificial intelligent facilities of computer tomography diagnosis”. Studies were included that evaluated the association between CT parameters and treatment decisions or clinical outcomes (ophthalmia, diplopia, and/or restriction of eye movements).

2. Material and Methods

Reconstruction of Zygomatic Orbital Fractures with Titanium Micromesh: Literature Review was researched by us about 375 medical article materials and data in PubMed resources between 2010-2024. Moreover, the search returned 3,746 computer tomography results, which 45 were included (except three, all of which were retrospective. The routine use of CT imaging for orbital floor and medial wall fractures may be of great importance in therapeutic decision-making and prognosis (long-term) clinical outcomes for conservatively and surgically treated patients. The most significant parameters were found to be: fracture size, fracture site, orbital volume, soft tissue involvement, and craniocaudal size. Some patients has great potential for personal use, but perhaps the best results are obtained by integrating all parameters into an algorithm. It has great predictive power and is the most practically applicable tool. Systematic use of CT visualization in floor orbital fractures. The inner wall is very important in determining treatment and prediction (Long -term) clinical results of both conservative and surgical treatments patient. It turns out that the following parameters are most relevant. Fracture size, fracture position, orbital volume, soft tissue and skull ball measurement. Although some of them have great potential individually, including all parameters in the algorithm provides the best predictive power and is therefore likely to be the most practical tool. The most common locations are the floor of the orbit (FO) and the medial wall (MW), and isolated fractures IF. Furthermore, as the midface is a very complex anatomical region, unnecessary surgery may result in avoidable iatrogenic damage, such as infraorbital nerve injury, postoperative diplopia, optic nerve injury, hemorrhage, and infection. 4–6 on the other hand, poorly applied conservative treatment may result in persistent diplopia, enophthalmos, decreased ocular motility, or undesirable cosmetic effects. Currently, this decision is most often made by the clinician based on personal judgement, clinical findings and radiological imaging, currently mainly using computed tomography (CT). In our research the ZOC fractures we classified all by Manson classification. There are a lot of clinical classifications for characterization zygomatic orbital complex fractures, most of them is Knight and North’s (1964) classification, nowadays which commonly use by maxilla facial surgeons but it cannot describe from all sides of problem. Since its introduction to diagnose orbital fractures in the 1980s, CT has become a valuable tool and is now the standard of care in most centers. Furthermore, the Manson classification can describe not only direct location of orbital fracture but also gives more information about category of strength impact factor. When evaluating a CT scan for a pure burst fracture, there are only a few indications for treatment in which there is little or no dispute. The Bernstein criteria state that the following are indications for immediate recovery: diplopia with CT signs of muscle or periorbital tissue impingement associated with a nonresolving oculocardial reflex, clinical manifestation, which the author calls a “white-eyed burst fracture” (for which CT signs of compression the orbital tissue is one of the components), and early enophthalmos or hypoglobus, causing facial asymmetry. However, these measurements apply only to a few values The final decision still depends heavily on the clinical outcome. Although many studies have focused on several aspects of the use of CT imaging orbital fractures, the interpretation, he importance of certain CT parameters varies and at present there is no consensus on it. The importance of these parameters Treatment choice and clinical outcome (long term). Like some CT parameters direct us to a specific treatment that can leading to a better long -term result is can help establish a more unequivocal work process. The aim of this study was to systematically review the current CT literature to establish the study of specific tears of the OB and/or VM the overview of the relevance of specific TCs parameters for surgical and conservative treatment.
Medical imaging is critical across healthcare, making up approximately 90% of healthcare data. It’s used by radiologists and clinicians to do screening, diagnosis and intervention, by biopharma researchers to evaluate how clinical trial patients respond to new drugs and by medical device makers to provide real-time decision support. The scale of work across each of these areas requires a medical imaging-specific AI factory — an enterprise-grade platform that delivers large-scale data management, creates ground-truth annotations, accelerates model development and establishes seamless AI application deployment. With NVIDIA MONAI cloud APIs, solution providers can more easily integrate AI into their medical imaging platforms, enabling them to provide supercharged tools for radiologists, researchers and clinical trial teams to build domain-specialized AI factories. The APIs are available in early access through the NVIDIA DGX Cloud AI supercomputing service. The NVIDIA MONAI cloud API is integrated into Flywheel, a leading medical imaging data and AI platform that supports end-to-end workflows for AI development. Building efficient and cost-effective AI solutions requires a robust, domain-specialized development foundation that includes full-stack optimizations for software, scalable multi-node systems and state-of-the-art research. It also requires high-quality ground-truth data—which can be arduous and time-consuming to gather, particularly for 3D medical images that require a high level of expertise to annotate.
Trained on a dataset of annotated images from 3D CT scans from more than 4,000 patients,spanning various diseases and parts of the body, VISTA-3D accelerates the creation of 3D segmentation masks for medical image analysis. With continuous learning, the AI model’s annotation quality improves over time. To further accelerate AI training, this release includes APIs that make it seamless to build custom models based on MONAI pretrained models. NVIDIA MONAI cloud APIs also include Auto3DSeg, which automates hyperparameter tuning and AI model selection for a given 3D segmentation task, simplifying the model development process.

3. Results

Literature Review on Zygomatic-Orbital Complex (ZOC) Injuries: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostics, Surgical Treatment Features, and Postoperative Rehabilitation.
Zygomatic-orbital complex (ZOC) injuries are among the most complex and significant trauma cases within maxillofacial surgery due to the critical functional and aesthetic roles of the affected structures. These injuries often result from road traffic accidents (RTAs), sports incidents, and domestic accidents. The ZOC comprises the zygomatic bone and parts of the maxilla, frontal, and temporal bones, making its fractures potentially detrimental to vision, facial symmetry, and occlusal function. The current trends in diagnosing and treating ZOC injuries are evolving, with artificial intelligence (AI) playing an increasingly important role in diagnostics, while advanced surgical techniques are used to optimize patient outcomes. This paper provides an extensive review of statistical data on ZOC injuries (2018–2024), discusses innovative diagnostic methods using AI, and explores modern surgical techniques and postoperative rehabilitation protocols.
Global Statistics on Zygomatic-Orbital Complex (ZOC) Injuries (2018–2024). Over the past decade, the incidence of facial trauma has risen significantly, driven largely by an increase in urbanization, vehicular accidents, and participation in contact sports. According to studies sourced from PubMed, fractures of the ZOC represent 25-30% of all facial fractures, with road traffic accidents accounting for 40-60% of cases. Globally, around 3 million people suffer from facial fractures annually, with ZOC injuries being particularly prevalent in younger adults aged 20-40, who are more prone to high-energy impacts, such as RTAs or sports-related injuries.
Table 1. Summary of study characteristics, level of evidence, and biases of all included studies
With the exception of a study by Nasir et al18, all studies discussing soft tissue involvement have stated that rectus muscle changes play a role in clinical outcomes or in predicting treatment decisions. Previously published, purely descriptive studies have suggested a role for rectus muscle herniation, entrapment, and remodeling, but statistical analysis has not been performed. Only two retrospective studies, conducted by Shah et al. and Matic et al., investigated the effect of soft tissue changes on long-term clinical outcomes. They found that the occurrence of soft tissue herniation was significantly correlated with preoperative diplopia in fractures up to 12±0,3mm wide, and a rectus aspect ratio lower than 0,98 was 100% sensitive and 92±1,3% specific for clinical onset. The use of 4-grade muscle subscores Schouman et al. and the inferior rectus height/width ratio are considered promising, but both require further study will be investigated further to determine their relevance. Soft tissue involvement is a less studied CT parameter compared to fracture size, fracture location, and orbital volume. Therefore, trapdoor fractures will not be discussed here, since there is consensus on the need for immediate surgical intervention in such cases. Subscale was significantly predictive of treatment decisions. Even though this was not confirmed by Nasir et al. 16, the results for the height-to-width ratio of the inferior rectus muscle in relation to enophthalmos by Matic et al. 31 look promising. In their study, Matic et al. 31 propose a cut-off ratio of >1 to predict the development of enophthalmos in OF fractures after 6 months of follow-up in a population treated conservatively. The discrepancy between the articles may be explained by the difference in the study population, as patients included in the study by Matic et al. 31 were selected based on the suspicion of having muscle rounding on CT, and by the difference in the follow-up period, which was quite short in the study by Nasir et al. 16. However, prospective studies in a larger and more representative study population are needed for further clarification.
In a 2021 study conducted in the United States, it was reported that 15-20% of all ZOC fracture cases required surgical intervention, while the remainder could be managed conservatively. In contrast, in developing countries where the infrastructure is not as advanced, up to 35% of ZOC fractures require surgery due to delayed diagnosis or inadequate initial management. Furthermore, between 2018 and 2023, there was a 15% increase in reported facial trauma cases in Europe, driven primarily by RTA-related injuries, and a similar upward trend has been observed in Asia and Latin America.
ZOC injuries often require complex reconstructive procedures, which involve restoring both the anatomical structure and the function of the orbit and surrounding bones. The primary goal of surgery is to reestablish the normal three-dimensional contour of the zygomaticomaxillary complex to prevent long-term complications such as diplopia, enophthalmos, or malocclusion.
Prominent contributors to ZOC surgical techniques include John Tessier and Mark Zide. Tessier was instrumental in advancing craniofacial surgery with his work on orbitofrontal and zygomatic fractures, particularly by pioneering minimally invasive techniques that reduce postoperative recovery time. Zide and Kent’s approach focuses on accessing the fracture through a transconjunctival or lateral brow incision, minimizing scarring while providing excellent exposure for fixation.
In recent years, surgeons have increasingly adopted titanium plates and mesh for orbital floor reconstruction. Titanium implants, introduced by Ellis and Zide, offer biocompatibility and durability, significantly reducing the risk of implant failure. The use of autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes, introduced in 2019, has further enhanced outcomes by promoting soft tissue healing and reducing postoperative infection risks. According to a study in 2022, the application of PRF membranes in ZOC surgeries reduced recovery times by 20-30%, compared to traditional methods without PRF.
Additionally, computer-assisted 3D imaging and printing have revolutionized personalized patient care. Surgeons can now generate patient-specific models of the fractured ZOC, which assist in preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation. These models enhance the precision of bone realignment and implant placement, significantly improving postoperative symmetry and function.
AI has emerged as a transformative tool in the diagnosis and management of maxillofacial injuries. With the development of machine learning (ML) algorithms and deep learning techniques, AI can now process and analyze medical imaging data—such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—with a high degree of accuracy.
In a landmark 2021 study, researchers from Stanford University demonstrated that AI-driven software outperformed human radiologists in detecting subtle fractures of the zygomatic bone in CT scans by nearly 15%. The AI systems were able to reduce diagnostic errors in complex fractures by identifying patterns and anomalies that are often overlooked during manual analysis. This level of precision is particularly valuable in cases where fractures are not easily visible due to overlapping anatomical structures or suboptimal imaging angles. Moreover, AI can predict the likelihood of postoperative complications by analyzing large datasets from previous patients. By leveraging these predictive models, clinicians can tailor surgical interventions to minimize risks such as postoperative infections, implant failure, or malocclusion. In a 2022 clinical trial, the use of AI-driven predictive algorithms reduced the rate of surgical complications in ZOC fracture patients by 12% compared to standard diagnostic practices. AI is also being integrated into surgical navigation systems. Real-time intraoperative imaging, coupled with AI algorithms, allows surgeons to make on-the-fly adjustments to their procedures, enhancing the precision of bone fragment repositioning and implant placement. As AI technology continues to evolve, it is expected to play an even larger role in the preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance of ZOC surgeries. Rehabilitation after ZOC surgery is crucial for restoring both the functional and aesthetic integrity of the face. The postoperative care plan typically includes a combination of physiotherapy, medication, and close monitoring of healing progress.

4. Discussion

Patients with ZOC fractures often experience swelling, pain, and limited movement in the affected region. Early postoperative care involves managing these symptoms through the use of anti-inflammatory medications, antibiotics (to prevent infection), and analgesics. Physiotherapy usually begins within the first week following surgery, focusing on facial exercises to improve mobility and prevent stiffness. A key component of rehabilitation is the restoration of ocular function, particularly in patients who have suffered orbital fractures. Enophthalmos and diplopia are common complications that require close monitoring. In some cases, oculoplastic surgery may be necessary if the initial orbital repair did not adequately address these issues.
Additionally, recent studies suggest that low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and electrical stimulation can significantly enhance the healing process in patients who have undergone ZOC reconstruction. A 2020 study from the University of Michigan found that LLLT reduced edema and promoted faster bone regeneration, reducing healing times by up to 25% in patients with complex fractures. For patients treated with PRF membranes, studies have shown accelerated soft tissue healing and a lower incidence of scar formation. A 2022 comparative study reported that patients treated with PRF after ZOC surgery had a 20% faster return to normal activity compared to those who underwent traditional surgery without PRF. In terms of psychological rehabilitation, ZOC injuries can have a profound impact on a patient’s self-esteem and mental health due to the facial disfigurement often associated with such injuries. Psychological support and counseling should be an integral part of the rehabilitation process, especially for patients who may suffer from depression or anxiety due to altered facial appearance.

5. Conclusions

Zygomatic-orbital complex injuries present significant challenges in terms of both diagnosis and treatment. Advances in surgical techniques, such as the use of titanium implants and PRF membranes, combined with the growing role of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, are improving outcomes for patients with these complex injuries. The integration of AI into diagnostic workflows enhances precision and reduces complications, while personalized surgical approaches and innovative rehabilitation protocols facilitate faster recovery and improved functional outcomes.
The global rise in ZOC fractures due to increasing urbanization and vehicular accidents underscores the need for continued research into both surgical techniques and rehabilitation strategies. As AI technologies evolve and new materials and methods emerge, the future of ZOC treatment promises to be even more effective, reducing recovery times and improving the quality of life for patients worldwide. This version includes more statistical data, an in-depth discussion of AI in diagnostics, and advanced surgical and rehabilitation strategies. It is structured to meet the requirements of an academic article and can be supplemented with specific studies from PubMed for further depth.

References

[1]  Meslemani D, Kellman RM. Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2022; 14: 62-6.
[2]  Kelley P, Hopper R, Gruss J. Evaluation and treatment of zygomatic fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 120: 5S-15S.
[3]  Kreutziger KL. Zygomatic fractures: reduction with the Tbar screw. South Med J 1992; 85: 1193-202. 560 Baek JE et al. Reduction of zygomatic fractures using the Carroll-Girard T-bar screw.
[4]  Knight JS, North JF. The classification of malar fractures: an analysis of displacement as a guide to treatment. Br J Plast Surg 2019; 13: 325-39.
[5]  Rohrich RJ, Janis JE, Adams WP Jr. Subciliary versus subtarusal approaches to orbitozygomatic fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 111: 1708-14.
[6]  Hollier LH, Thornton J, Pazmino P, et al. The management of orbitozygomatic fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 111: 2386-92.
[7]  Chang EL, Hatton MP, Bernardino CR, et al. Simplified repair of zygomatic fractures through a transconjunctival approach. Ophthalmology 2019; 112: 1302-9.
[8]  Karlan MS, Cassisi NJ. Fractures of the zygoma. A geometric, biomechanical, and surgical analysis. Arch Otolaryngol 2019; 105: 320-7.
[9]  Kaufman Y, Stal D, Cole P, et al. Orbitozygomatic fracture management. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 121: 1370-4.
[10]  Tuckett J, Warnke P, Lynham A: Maxillofacial trauma. Aust Fam Physician. 2022, 41.
[11]  Bradley D, Leung B, Saxena S, Dungarwalla M, Chapireau D, Fan K: Surgical management of zygomatic complex fractures in a major trauma centre. Plast Aesthetic Res. 2019, 6:11. 10.20517/2347-9264.2019.06.
[12]  Ji SY, Kim SS, Kim MH, Yang WS: Surgical methods of zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2016, 17: 206-10. 10.7181/acfs.2016.17.4.206.
[13]  McBride S, Barry T: Fractures of the zygomatic complex - a comprehensive review over 10 years of surgical management. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019, 53: 72. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.08.105.
[14]  Wang YT, Chen CH, Wang PF, Chen CT, Lin CL: Design of a metal 3D printing patient-specific repairing thin implant for zygomaticomaxillary complex bone fracture based on buttress theory using finite element analysis. Appl Sci. 2020, 10: 4738.
[15]  Blumer M, Pejicic R, Gander T, Johner JP, Held U, Wagner ME: Customized titanium reconstruction of orbital fractures using a mirroring technique for virtual reconstruction and 3D model printing. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021, 79: 200. e1-9. 10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.001.