American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

p-ISSN: 2165-901X    e-ISSN: 2165-9036

2024;  4(2): 282-286

doi:10.5923/j.ajmms.20241402.25

Received: Jan. 12, 2024; Accepted: Feb. 1, 2024; Published: Feb. 8, 2024

 

Methods of Increasing the Effectiveness of Detection of Covid-19-Related Preeclampsia by Biochemical Markers in the Formation of a Complex of Symptoms

Nishanova F. P., Karimova L. A., Nadirkhanova N. S., Asatova M. M.

Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center for Maternal and Child Health, Uzbekistan

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

The article presents methods for increasing the efficiency of detection during the formation of the symptom complex of preeclampsia using biochemical markers associated with COVID-19.

Keywords: Preeclampsia, COVID-19, HELLP-syndrome, Elimination of pneumonia

Cite this paper: Nishanova F. P., Karimova L. A., Nadirkhanova N. S., Asatova M. M., Methods of Increasing the Effectiveness of Detection of Covid-19-Related Preeclampsia by Biochemical Markers in the Formation of a Complex of Symptoms, American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2024, pp. 282-286. doi: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20241402.25.

1. Introduction

Preeclampsia remains one of the most common complications of pregnancy today, which causes serious disorders in the mother and fetus [1,3,5]. Most researchers agree that preeclampsia ranks third in terms of maternal and perinatal complications and mortality, accounting for 11-16% compared to birth [8,12,18]. According to studies, more than 8 million complications of preeclampsia are recorded annually worldwide, which is the leading cause of maternal and perinatal death, taking the lives of 60,000 young women each year [2,4,6].
So far the pathogenesis of preeclampsia remains unclear. Some researchers believe that the placenta plays an important role in the occurrence and development of preeclampsia, since after removal of the placenta, the symptoms in patients are significantly reduced [2,6,10]. In addition, its development may be closely related to endothelial dysfunction and immune disorders [13,19,25].
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is the most widespread infectious virus in the world. Due to its rapid development and the lack of specific treatment strategies, it has become a global pandemic. The primary effects of COVID-19 are on the lungs, followed by liver damage, followed by thrombocytopenia, hypertension, and kidney damage. Pregnant women may be more susceptible to COVID-19 due to immunological and physiological adaptive remodeling that occurs during pregnancy [14,15,16].
In addition, COVID-19 also causes hypoxic damage to the placenta, which may contribute to the development of preeclampsia.
In order to evaluate the relationshipbetween COVID-19 and preeclampsia, scientists from School of Medicine at Wayne University conducted a meta-analysis of 28 studies, which included data on 790,900 women in childbirth, 15,500 of whomwere infected with the coronavirus. In infected women, the risk of developing this condition was 62% higher than in uninfected pregnant women [7,9,11,13].
In addition, during pregnancy, COVID-19 is associated with a significant increase in the risk of severe preeclampsia, eclampsia and HELLP-syndrome are considered to be a severe pathology that develops in the first week after delivery, accompanied by increased jaundice and liver failure.
According to the researchers, the risk of preeclampsia increases with asymptomatic carriage and symptomatic disease, but women with severe COVID-19 have the greatest chance of complications from preeclampsia.
According to the results of the study, after the elimination of pneumonia, the typical preeclampsia was preserved in only one patient, in whom the concentration of LDH increased, the ratio of sFlt-1/PlGF>110 exceeded, and the disorder of blood flow in the uterine arteries remained [17,20,23].
These indicators directly show the disruption of angiogenesis and placental hypo perfusion, which are diagnostically valuable signs that allow distinguishing true preeclampsia from a number of diseases that can imitate it.
It is known that remodeling of the uterine spiral artery and disruption of trophoblast invasion play a key role in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia, which subsequently leads to decreased perfusion and reactive oxidative stress in the placenta. As a result, the pulsation index in the uterine arteries increases, the ratio of angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors is disturbed: the concentration of sFlt-1 increases and the production of PlGF decreases [4,14,22].
From the findings of the studies, it can be assumed that true preeclampsia occurs only in pregnant women who are at risk for the development of preeclampsia, and in a pregnant woman complicated by COVID-19, the characteristic symptoms were caused directly by the severe course of COVID-19 or the drugs prescribed for its treatment. Normal values of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, LDH concentration, and absence of uterine blood flow disorders were confirmed in pregnant women complicated by COVID-19 [16,24,26].
It is noted that COVID-19 and preeclampsia have similar clinical symptoms, which can make it difficult to make an accurate diagnosis. Doctors state that studying preeclampsia-like symptoms in pregnant women with COVID-19 can help avoid misdiagnosis and premature birth [21].
Differential diagnosis of preeclampsia in pregnant women with COVID-19 is performed by assessing placental vascular development using VEGF, PlGF, and the anti-angiogenic factor sFlt-1. This imbalance may also be due to inflammatory mediators, including cytokines (eg, IL-1, INF-γ, TNF) and the complement cascade. The ratio of sFlt-1/PlGF can also be altered by infectious conditions, but dysregulated levels of these mediators are associated with placental insufficiency, placental hypoxia, and poor transport of nutrients to the fetus, leading to poor neonatal complications.
The purpose of the research. To identify preeclampsia and the symptom complex of preeclampsia associated with COVID-19 and the biomarkers which are important for diagnosis, to develop differential diagnosis.

2. Materials and Methods

Scientific research was carried out at the Zangiota infectious disease clinic, “Immunogenic test” private clinic, as well as at Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center for Maternal and Child Health. 80 women involved in the study were complicated by preeclampsia. 25 of them were women complicated by preeclampsia and had COVID-19, 25 women were complicated by COVID-19 and had a symptom complex of preeclampsia, and the control group consisted of 30 women whose pregnancy was uncomplicated.
The method of biochemical research was carried out by Hegay T.R., the author, head of the departmentin the private clinic “Immunogen test”inthe Republic of Uzbekistan. Examinations were carried out using the "Mindray MR-96A" immunoenzyme analyzer. Biomarkers such as sFlt-1, PlGF, their ratio sFlt-1/PlGF, LDHwere examined in the plasma of pregnant women involved in the study.
sVEGF-R1FMS-related tyrosine kinase-1 (sFLT-1)-human sVEGF-R1 ELISA kit is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of VEGFR1. Catalog number: BMS268-3 and BMS268-3TEN. Developed in 2019 by Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Soluble VEGF-R1 (sFLT-1) is a naturally occurring endogenous form of VEGF-R1 that was originally discovered in human vascular endothelial cell supernatant. It is formed as a result of differential proteinization of the flt-1 gene. In vitro, VEGF-R1 indirectly inhibits VEGF-A-mediated signaling in endothelial cells and can be used to block physiological angiogenesis in several organs in vivo.
The reagent kit should be stored at 2°C to 8°C. Reagents remaining after use should be stored in a refrigerator at 2°C to 8°C.
PLGF (placental growth factor) ELISA – Angiogenesis and vascular transformation are important processes in the normal development of the placenta. Anomalous angiogenesis and changes in blood vessels are one of the main factors for preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Placental growth factor (PLGF), a member of the VEGF family, is mainly produced by the placenta and is a potent angiogenic factor. A related receptor, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, is believed to have angiogenic properties.
This biochemical assay is an enzyme immunoassay used to measure human placental growth factor in serum. This reagent can be used as a diagnostic tool to assess the possibility of preeclampsia in pregnant women.
This reagent is manufactured in Demeditec Diagnostics GmbH. Lise-Strabe2/ 24145 Kiel (Germany). The Demeditec PLGF ELISA Kit is an enzyme immunoassay based on the sandwich principle (ELISA).
This reagent should also be stored at 2-8°C until the expiration date.
All patients underwent a clinical and laboratory examination, including general analysis of blood and urine, fibrinogen, aPTT, PTI, thrombin time, INR, D-dimer, etc.
The age of all the women under observation was around 18-42 years. Average age in group 1 was 28.2±0.8 (17-42) years; It was 29.8±0.8 (42-19) in group II, and 25.7±0.7 (20-37) in the control group.
Figure 1. The average age of the examined women
For clinical and statistical analysis and during the examination of pregnant women in the main group, anamnesis data, somatic and gynecological diseases, the onset and nature of menstruation, sexual and reproductive functions were taken into account.
The menstrual function of pregnant women was assessed by the following indicators: menarche, the formation of a regular menstrual cycle, the specifics of its course.
Figure 2. The duration of the menstrual cycle of women participating in the study
As can be seen from the picture, the duration of the menstrual cycle was 23±0.26 days in the control group, 25.7±0.33 in the 1st group, and 27±0.37 days in the 2nd group.
Analysis of menstrual cycle characteristics showed that menarche occurred in patients between the ages of 13 and 16.
The largest period of menarche at the age of 15 and older was found in group 2, i.e. pregnant women complicated by preeclampsia (40%), in group 1 this figure was 30%. When the duration of the menstrual cycle was analyzed, no statistically significant difference was found in the groups (R>0.05). The average length of the menstrual cycle in women complicated by preeclampsia was slightly longer and was 27 (23-31) days. However, there was no statistically significant difference compared to women in the other control groups.
In the studied group, the age at which women started sexual life was from 17 to 25 years.
When analyzed by the age of onset of sexual life, in group 2 25 years and older made up 50% and in the control group it was 38.4%, and in group 1 this figure was 12%, respectively 2,2,1,8 and 2.6% higher.

3. The Findings of the Research

In pregnant women complicated by PE and COVID-19, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in plasma was reduced and was 21.52±0.57 seconds in pregnancy group 1 and 24.51±0.69 seconds in group 2, that is, 1.70 (R< 0.05) and 1.49 (R<0.001) times decreased. The results obtained show that (APTT)decreases with increasing gestational age in pregnant women with PE and COVID-19, and this, in our opinion, indicates an increased risk. In the control group, (APTT)was 36.62±0.25 seconds. The prothrombin index was calculated using a special formula and it was 93.48±0.54% in the control group. This indicator was 102.31±1.24% in pregnant women complicated by PE, and 98.62±1.27% in pregnant women with COVID-19. This indicates the presence of hypercoagulation in pregnant women.
As can be seen from Table 1, there was a tendency to lengthen the international normalized ratio in pregnant women with PE: in group II, INR was 0.95±0.01 and in group 2it made up 0.98±0.02. In the control group, this indicator was 0.86±0.03. The obtained results showed a significant shift of blood towards hypercoagulability in the second stage of blood coagulation in pregnant women with PE and COVID-19.
Table 1. Hemostasiological indicators of pregnant women in the study, M±m
     
Studying the amount of fibrinogen showed a significant increase in its concentration in the blood plasma, which indicated the presence of a hypercoagulable shift (see Table 1). In the control group, the amount of fibrinogen increased by 1.72 (R<0.001) times and reached 5.13±0.14 g/l in pregnant women with PE. In pregnant women complicated by COVID-19, it was 2.06 (R<0.001) times higher than in the control group, and it was 6.16±0.12 g/l. Therefore, an increase in the amount of fibrinogen in the blood plasma can lead to the development of PE and can be used as a predictor to some extent.
Our research shows that the amount of D-dimer in the serum of physiologically pregnant women is 613.6±30.7 ng/ml and is higher than that of healthy women, and it is related to the development of the fetus. This indicator of pregnant women complicated by PE was 2.85 times higher than the control group and was 1753.9±2 ng/ml. In pregnant women complicated by COVID-19, it was 2.94 times (R<0.001) higher than in the control group and was 1805.4±50.5ng/ml.
It is known that D-dimer is one of the main markers of the hemostasis system. An increase in its amount in the blood indicates not only the formation of fibrin threads, but also its lysis and predicts the development of thromboembolic complications.
Table 2. Biochemical indicators in the blood serum of pregnant women complicated by COVID-19 and preeclampsia, M±m
     
The analysis of biochemical indicators revealed the development of hypoproteinemia, hypertransaminasemia, hyperbilirubinemia in pregnant women, the increase of urea, creatinine and uric acid levels in pregnant women complicated by PE and COVID-19.
Table 3. Amount of antiangiogenic and proangiogenic factors in blood serum of pregnant women complicated by COVID-19 and preeclampsia, M±m
     
The amount of sFlt-1 in the blood serum of women with pregnancy complicated by PE showed a statistically significant increase of 11 times (R<0.001) compared to the control group and was 12854.72±290.86 pg/ml. Its amount was 10.6 and 1.29 (R<0.001) times higher than the indicators of the 2nd group, compared to the control group and the 1st group. The amount of PlGF in the serum of pregnant women of this group decreased by 4.4 times (R<0.001) compared to the indicators of the 1st group and was 84.36±6.77 pg/ml. The ratio of sFlt-1 to PlGF was 57.21±5.82 in group 1, which was 10 (R<0.001) times higher than that of the control group, and the indicators of group 2 were 37 (R<0.001) times higher than that of the control group.
Therefore, the decrease of proangiogenic factors, increase of antiangiogenic factors and their mutual ratio in the blood serum of pregnant women indicate the risk of PE.
In the development of PE, sFlt-1 is important and considered a receptor of VEGF-A and is produced in placental syncytiotrophoblasts. VEGF-A is considered a growth factor of the vascular endothelium and ensures the formation of placental blood vessels, their proliferation, viability and permeability.

4. Conclusions

• an increase in biochemical indicators is observed with increased complications of preeclampsia in pregnant women, which, in turn, can lead to a fetal growth restriction and complications.
• In pregnant women complicated by preeclampsia and COVID-19, a tendency to hypercoagulation was observed at all stages of coagulation hemostasis, especially in pregnant women with severe PE, and mainly hyperfibrinogenemia and a progressive increase in D-dimer levels were observed.
• it has been proven that in the blood serum of pregnant women complicated by preeclampsia and COVID-19 the amount of sFlt-1 increases rapidly, the amount of PlGF decreases, and the ratio of sFlt-1/PlGF increases progressively.
• When all the above methods of treatment are used together, the cost associated with this disease decreases and the effectiveness of the treatment increases.

References

[1]  Abbas AM, Ahmed OA, Shaltout AS. COVID-19 and maternal pre-eclampsia: a synopsis. Scand J Immunol. 2020; 92: e12918. doi: 10.1111/sji.12918.
[2]  Agarwal A, Chen A, Ravindran N, To C, Thuluvath PJ. Gastrointestinal and liver manifestations of COVID-19. J ClinExpHepatol. 2020; 10: 263–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2020.03.001.
[3]  Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M, et al. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020; 370: m3320.
[4]  Barta A, Cheron AC, Christophe JL, Doucet F, Hubinont C. COVID-19 and pregnancy: an unusual case with multi-systemic failure. Case Rep ObstetGynecolReprod. 2020; 2: 2–3. doi: 10.31487/j.CROGR.2020.02.04.
[5]  Chen J, Khalil RA. Matrix metalloproteinases in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. ProgMolBiolTransl Sci. 2017; 148: 87–165. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.04.001.
[6]  Chen N, Zhon M, Dong X et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 Novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive Study. www.thelancet.com. Published online January 29, 2020.
[7]  Deng X, Liu B, Li J, Zhang J, Zhao Y, Xu K. Blood biochemical characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systemic review and meta-analysis. ClinChem Lab Med. 2020; 58: 1172–81. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0338.
[8]  Hansen JN, Hine J, Strout TD. COVID-19 and preeclampsia with severe features at 34-weeks’ gestation. Am J Emerg Med. 2020; 39:252e3–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.052.
[9]  Hassanpour SH, Karami ZS. Evaluation of hepatic biomarkers in pregnant women with preeclampsia. GynecolObstet. 2018; 08:1000487. doi: 10.4172/2161-0932.1000487.
[10]  Khalil G. Preeclampsia: pathophysiology and the maternal-fetal risk. J HypertensManag. 2017; 3:024. doi: 10.23937/2474-3690/1510024.
[11]  Liu N, Guo Y-N, Gong L-K, Wang BS. Advances in biomarker development and potential application for preeclampsia based on pathogenesis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2021; 9: 100119. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2020.100119.
[12]  Mendoza M, Garcia-Ruiz I, Maiz N, et al. Pre-eclampsia-like syndrome induced by severe COVID-19: a prospective observational study. BJOG. 2020; 127:1374–80. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16339.
[13]  Monteleone PA, Nakano M, Lazar V, Gomes AP, de Martin H, Bonetti TC. A review of initial data on pregnancy during the COVID-19 outbreak: implications for assisted reproductive treatments. JBRA AssistReprod. 2020; 24: 219–25.
[14]  Nikiforov V.V., Suranova T.G., Mironov A. Yu., Zabozlaev F.G. Novaya koronavirusnayainfektsiya (COVID-19): etiologiya, epidemiologiya, klinika, diagnostika, lechenieiprofilaktika [New Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19): etiology, epidemiology, clinic, diagnostics, treatment and prevention]. Moscow, 2020, 48 p.
[15]  Nikuei P, Rajaei M, Roozbeh N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of sFlt1/PlGF ratio as a marker for preeclampsia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20:80. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2744-2.
[16]  Pant V, Yadav BK, Sharma J. A cross sectional study to assess the sFlt-1: PlGF ratio in pregnant women with and without preeclampsia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19:266. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2399-z.
[17]  Pereira A, Cruz-Melguizo S, Adrien M, Fuentes L, Marin E, Perez-Medina T. Clinical course of coronavirus disease-2019 in pregnancy. ActaObstetGynecol Scand. 2020; 99:839–47.
[18]  Pringle KG, Tadros MA, Callister RJ, Lumbers ER. The expression and localization of the human placental prorenin/renin-angiotensin system throughout pregnancy: roles in trophoblast invasion and angiogenesis? Placenta. 2011; 32:956–62. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.09.020.
[19]  Raguema N, Moustadraf S, Bertagnolli M. Immune and apoptosis mechanisms regulating placental development and vascularization in preeclampsia. Front Physiol. 2020.
[20]  Rana S, Lemoine E, Granger JP, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia: pathophysiology, challenges, and perspectives. CircRes. 2019; 124:1094–112. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313276.
[21]  Rolnik DL. Can COVID-19 in pregnancy cause pre-eclampsia? BJOG. 2020; 127:1381. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16369.
[22]  Sadretdinov M.A., Timerbulatov Sh.V., Valishin D.A., Timerbulatov V.M. Diagnostika covid-19: neispol' zovannyetekhnologii – vozmozhnostiobshchegoanalizakrovi [Diagnosis of COVID-19: unused technologies – the possibilities of a full blood count]. Meditsinskiivestnik Bashkortostana, 2020, vol. 15, no. 3(87), pp. 31–34.
[23]  Schwartz DA. An analysis of 38 pregnant women with COVID-19, their newborn infants, and maternal-fetal transmission of SARS-CoV-2: maternal coronavirus infections and pregnancy outcomes. ArchPatholLabMed. 2020; 144: 799–805. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0901-SA.
[24]  The prevention, diagnosis and treatment of the new coronavirus infection 2019-nCoV. Temporary guidelines Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Pulmonologiya, 2019, no. 29(6), pp. 655–672.
[25]  Villar J, Ariff S, Gunier RB, et al. Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality among pregnant women with and without COVID-19 infection: the INTERCOVID Multinational Cohort Study. JAMA Pediatr. 2021; 175: 817–26.
[26]  VlachodimitropoulouKoumoutsea E, Vivanti AJ, Shehata N, et al. COVID-19 and acute coagulopathy in pregnancy. J ThrombHaemost. 2020; 18:1648–52. doi: 10.1111/jth.14856.