Kh. A. Akilov, Sh. A. Nizomov, B. S. Shukurov
Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
The aim of the study was to improve the treatment results of post-traumatic strictures and urethral obliterations in children using a two-diameter drainage catheter. Introduction. Prostate and bladder neck injuries are more common in childhood. The difficulty of treating urethral injuries is due to lifelong urinary complications (re-formation of strictures, urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction). In spite of the successes achieved in surgical removal of strictures and obliterations, the percentage of unsuccessful outcomes is still very high and they range from 25 to 50%. Material and methods. The clinical material is based on a retrospective analysis of the treatment of 100 boys aged 3 to 15 years who were treated at the clinic of the Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers from 2005 to 2021. If the urinary tract infection was “controllable,” surgical treatment was performed (modified Marion-Holtsov surgery with the installation of a two-diameter catheter). Results. According to urethrograms, the length of strictures and obliterations averaged 1.9 ± 0.2 cm. The performed local manipulations and the technique of the surgery caused a smooth course of the early postoperative period. Neither general nor local complications were observed. The wounds healed initially, which allowed the removal of a special drainage catheter from the urethra no later than 8-9 days. Discussion. Common causes of unsuccessful outcomes of the posterior urethra strictures and obliterations of traumatic origin surgical treatment are incomplete removal of scar tissue, unsuccessful suturing of the anastomosis, strong tension on the anastomosis line in the immediate postoperative period, as well as ineffective drainage of the bladder, catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Conclusions. The correct implementation of providing the first aid algorithms for urethral injuries, careful preparation and correct execution of the urethral anastomosis surgical manipulation stages using a two-diameter drainage catheter, with the correct selection of antimicrobial agents for parenteral and topical use allowed to achieve good results in 98.0% of cases, including cases of repeated correction at recurrent strictures and obliterations of urethra.
Keywords:
Obliteration, Stricture, Urethra, Marion-Holtsov surgery
Cite this paper: Kh. A. Akilov, Sh. A. Nizomov, B. S. Shukurov, Obliteration and Stricture of the Urethra in Children: Improvement of Surgical Treatment Results, American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Vol. 13 No. 12, 2023, pp. 1997-2001. doi: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20231312.38.
1. Introduction
Prostate and bladder neck injuries are more common in childhood. Injuries of the posterior urethra occur in 4-19% due to pelvic fractures because of a vehicle injury. Injuries of the anterior urethra occur due to trauma to the penis or penetrating wound. The difficulty of treating urethral injuries is due to lifelong urinary complications (re-formation of strictures, urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) [1,2].A comparative analysis of Clinical Recommendations on urogenital System Injury by the European Association of Urologists (EAU), the American Association of Urologists (AUA) and the Société Internationale d'urologie (SIU) showed that multicenter studies are still relevant today. It is necessary to optimize, improve the quality and increase the degree of evidence of these documents both for the diagnosis and treatment of urethral injuries [3]. In spite of the successes achieved in surgical removal of strictures and obliterations, the percentage of unsuccessful outcomes is still very high and they range from 25 to 50% [4-10]. Moreover, the range of unsuccessful outcomes causes is very diverse, ranging from violations in primary care and diagnosis, ending by imperfections and sins of surgical technique and postoperative management [11-13]. In this regard, the issue of preventing the formation of post-traumatic strictures and their recurrence remains a particularly urgent problem of pediatric surgery.The aim of the study was to improve the treatment results of post-traumatic strictures and urethral obliterations in children using a two-diameter drainage catheter.
2. Material and Methods
The clinical material is based on a retrospective analysis of the treatment of 100 boys aged 3 to 15 years who were treated at the clinic of the Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers from 2005 to 2021. The age of the patients varied as follows: from 3 to 7 years (n=10), from 7 to 12 years (n=56), and from 12 to 15 years (n=34). 34 (34%) of them had strictures and 66 (66%) had obliterations. By localization: in the membranous part (n=23 (46%)), in the prostatic (n=24 (24%) or in both parts of the urethra (n=28 (28%)). One (2%) patient had a complete separation of the urethra from the neck of the bladder followed by the development of the posterior urethra stricture. In 72 (72%) cases, pelvic bone injuries were the cause of damage, in 28 (28%) children - a fall from a height. Previously, 62 (62%) patients were operated in clinics at the place of dislocation: strictures and obliterations were recurrent when they admitted to our hospital. 34 of them were operated according to the Marion-Holtsov method, 28 patients - according to Cross-Fronstein technique. After these surgeries, 34 patients were performed prolonged unsuccessful urethral bougienage. The remaining 38 (38%) patients were not operated on before being admitted to our hospital. All patients were performed ascending and descending urethrography, ultrasound of the urethra and bladder, urethroscopy, and possibly mictional cystourethrography. If necessary, the neck of the bladder, the inner opening of the urethra and the urethra sections proximal to the affected area were examined through a cystostomy fistula. Control uroflowmetry was performed after surgery when catheters and drains were removed. Erectile function was also evaluated by the presence of a morning spontaneous erection of the penis in the boy.All 100 patients already had suprapubic cystostomy drainage upon admission. After taking urine for bacteriological examination, drainage replacement and sanitation of the urinary tract were performed. When urinary tract infection was "controllable", a modified Marion-Holtsov surgery with the installation of a two-diameter catheter was performed (patent IDP No. 05277, 19.11.2001 (Fig. 1)). | Figure 1. Two-diameter catheter for urethra and bladder drainage |
The catheter was made during the surgery taking into account the anatomical parameters of the patient.The method of modified urethroplasty by Marion-Holtsov. We used a perineal incision strictly along the median line, giving wide access to the posterior urethra. When deepening this incision, unlike the previous one, the muscles are not injured. After dissection of the skin, subcutaneous tissue and exposure of the surface of the bulbous-cavernous muscle, and it was separated from the spongy tissue of the urethral bulb. Then we took the muscle to two sides, preserving it from damage as much as possible, as injury of this muscle is fraught with the development of further erectile dysfunction.The spongy part, together with the urethra, was separated from the place of fixation, cutting the ligament attaching to the lower edge of the pubic bones. At the same time, we did not separate the spongy tissue from the urethra, as recommended by L.A. Kudryavtsev (1993), as the wall of the children's urethra is very thin and delicate. We continued the release of the bulbous part of the urethra in depth along with the membranous part to the prostate gland. After this, we cut off the urethra from the scarred part (in case of strictures and obliterations of the membranous section) or as close as possible to the scarred part of the urethra (when there is a stricture or obliteration in the prostatic section, or in cases of separation of the urethra from the bladder neck). It must be remembered that every millimeter of non-scarred tissue of the urethral wall is very valuable for protecting the anastomotic line from tension.In cases of repeated surgery, due to numerous adhesions and scars of surrounding tissues, as well as due to complete obliteration of the membranous, prostatic or both of these parts of the urethra, it is not possible to strictly adhere to the principle of topographic-anatomical surgeries. That is why, the main attention should be paid to carefully releasing the distal part of the urethra and cutting it off from the obliterated or stricturally altered part at this stage of the surgery. Removal of scars in the proximal part should begin from the inner surface of the pubic joint in order to avoid injury of the prostate as much as possible. After cutting off the scar tissue and finding the blunt end of the proximal part of the urethra, its wall was carefully dissected and their ends were freed from the surrounding tissues.After careful preparation of both ends of the urethra for end-to-end anastomosis, the bladder was drained with a two-diameter vesicourethral tube, the proximal end of which (diameter 0.5-0.6 cm) was brought out to the suprapubic region, at the level of trigonum vesicae. From the initial part of the bladder neck, the wall of this tube becomes thinner (diameter 0.15-0.18 cm) and another catheter with an outer diameter of 0.4-0.5 cm was put on it, on the wall of which there were small multiple drainage holes. The end of both catheters was removed through the external opening of the urethra by 5-6 cm (Fig. 2). | Figure 2. Catheter functioning scheme |
Irrigation of the bladder cavity is carried out through the entrance A, the washing liquid exits through the exit A. Through the entrance B, irrigation of the anastomosis zone, the lumen between the drainage and the urethral wall is performed. The washing liquid exits through outlet B.When applying an anastomosis, 4 ligatures are applied in children under 7 years old and 6 ligatures are applied in children 7-14 years old. The sutures are evenly spaced along the circumference of the neck of the bladder or the remainder of the posterior urethra. Usually, in these cases, the posterior part of the urethra is a remnant of the wall, no more than 0.2-0.3 cm long.
3. Results
According to urethrograms, the length of strictures and obliterations averaged 1.9 ± 0.2 cm. Intraoperatively, altered areas of the urethra were released with great care. The scar-altered part of the urethra was cut off as close as possible to the pathological areas. After excision, the diastasis between the proximal and distal parts averaged 3.8 ± 0.2 cm. That is why, maximum mobilization of the distal part of the urethra was performed to reduce the tension of the anastomosis line. In one case, mobilization of the bladder neck was performed in a patient with separation of the urethra from the bladder neck. The next step was to install a two-diameter polyvinyl chloride catheter, the dimensions of which were selected individually for each case. Then an anastomosis was performed - monofilament sutures were placed evenly around the circumference, as it was mentioned above.Early postoperative treatment did not differ from generally accepted principles. But at the same time, we especially focused on three factors. The first factor was the selection of a parenteral antibiotic, when the basis was not only the result of a bacteriological study, but also the features of the microbial landscape of the entire cohort of patients. Nosocomial flora prevailed in our patients, when a protected antibiotic with bactericidal abilities in relation to nosocomial strains with a sufficient evidence base should be chosen.The second factor was our proposed constant irrigation of the bladder with sterile solutions containing an antiseptic component. Chlorhexidine bigluconate or dioxidine was used for this purpose.The third factor was regular irrigation of the urethral anastomosis site, followed by the introduction of antibiotics through the microcatheter we have proposed. By other words, we carried out systematic local rehabilitation of the wound and local treatment of infection.For parenteral administration, cephalosporin antibiotics of the third generation were chosen, in particular, Ceftriaxone and Ceftriaxone Sulbaktam. At insufficient efficiency of antibacterial therapy (increased body temperature and uncontrolled infection according to staged urine analysis), they were replaced to Cefoperazone sulbactam. Aminoglycosides – gentamicin - were used for topical application. In cases of Candida presence, 50 mg/day fluconazole was included.Irrigation of the bladder was carried out using a sterile saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride solution) with an antiseptic. Chlorhexidine bigluconate (in all age groups) or Dioxidine (only in the older age group) was used as an antiseptic component. Irrigation of the anastomosis zone was carried out with 0.5% dioxidine solution ( hydroxymethyl quinoxalindioxide) through a catheter drainage tube from 10 to 50 ml, depending on the transparency and purity of the washing waters 2 times a day. The treatment course was 7-9 days, daily, until the catheter was removed.Thanks to the use of a special draining catheter, local complications of infectious genesis were not observed in any case, which allowed to prevent relapse, as other surgeons noted. A recurrence of stricture was observed only in two cases. It was a repeated surgery, when during the intervention a large extent of diastasis was detected between the healthy ends of the urethra. It turned out to be more than 6 cm, and this patient, for technical reasons, had to be used to restore the urethra with a flap of scrotum skin on the vascular pedicle.The performed local manipulations and the technique of the surgery caused a smooth course of the early postoperative period. Neither general nor local complications were observed. The wounds healed initially, which allowed the removal of a special drainage catheter from the urethra no later than 8-9 days. After the surgery, the maximum volume of the bladder, the thickness of its wall, the volume of residual urine and the time of urination were monitored. The results of these studies revealed no deviations from the age criteria of the norm. Also, no significant differences with the data from long-term examinations were observed. 98 children had no complaints, the urine stream was normal, the data of the simplified uro-flowmetric index (Goldberg B.B., 1974) were within normal limits (14.3 + 3.3 ml/s after removal of the catheter on the 10th day after surgery; 23.6+4.9 ml/s 3-6 months after surgery; 24.9+5.8 ml/s 12 months after surgery, P > 0.05). Taking into account all objective data, recurrence of stricture at the site of anastomosis was excluded. The results of the surgery in the long-term period after 3-6 months (n=44) and 1 year (n=36) were checked by interview, direct checkup and examination.
4. Discussion
The problem of treating urethral strictures in children is a very difficult task. Today, there are various methods of treatment, ranging from endoscopic procedures, ending with open surgical interventions. Urethral strictures in children have a huge impact on the future life of children if they are not treated properly. The problem has not only a material side, but also an equally important psychological aspect, both for the child and the whole family. Therefore, the main goal of the surgeon is to find a minimally invasive procedure with a short cure time. V.N. Tkachuk, B.K. Komyakov (1990) in their works, noted relapses in 56% of operated patients due to posttraumatic strictures of the urethra. During the Marion-Holtsov surgery in the posterior urethra, 3 patients out of 7 cases had a relapse (Kudryavtsev L.A., 1993). A.Ahmed, G.S.Kalay (1997) noted a relapse in 20.9% of cases after end-to-end anastomosis of the urethra, which were then re-operated.We prepared a questionnaire For a retrospective analysis of the causes of unsuccessful treatment of 62 patients with recurrent strictures. Possible reasons were divided into groups: technical, local and general. Intraoperative errors were attributed to technical reasons: incomplete removal of scarred tissues (55%), unsuccessful suturing of the anastomosis (46%), poor-quality suture material (34%), strong tension of the anastomosis line (33%) and ineffective drainage of the bladder (65%). Local causes included stagnation in the area of anastomosis, local urinary infection. The general ones included the lack of a systematic approach at the prehospital stage, when iatrogenic injury or aggravation of damage was often observed as a result of multiple and sometimes violent attempts to catheterize the urethra at the initial stages of emergency care (45% of cases). This is the result of non-compliance with the standards of emergency care, where retrograde urethrography is the primary diagnostic procedure of choice for a specific assessment of possible injury of the urethra and determining the subsequent actions of specialists [14]. Another factor leading to the inefficiency of urethral strictures surgical treatment should be considered the occurrence of spontaneous erections in the early postoperative period (53%). In our observations, the most frequent pathogens of infectious and inflammatory diseases of the urinary system were microorganisms of the Enterobacteriaceae and Proteus families, less often St. saprophiticus. A similar spectrum of microorganisms in the microbiological examination of urine was obtained by most authors [15, 16, 17]. Proper selection of antimicrobial therapy components in the preoperative and postoperative period, achievement of controllability of urinary tract infection, effective drainage in the early postoperative period and washing of the anastomosis zone prevents its infection and has a beneficial effect on the healing processes and is the main feature of relapse prevention.The next main task is adequate drainage and irrigation of the bladder cavity, and most importantly, the anastomosis zone and the lumen between the drainage and the urethral wall. Our offered catheter solves these problems. 98.0% from 100 operated children had good results due to the use of a two-decameter drainage catheter. Only two patients had a relapse, which was re-operated with good long-term results. There were no other significant complications associated with the underlying disease.
5. Conclusions
Careful preoperative preparation, gentle and economical resection within healthy tissues of well-mobilized anastomosed ends of the urethra and the use of a two-diameter drainage catheter allowed us to reduce the degree of tension of the anastomosis line both intraoperatively and in the early postoperative period (by preventing spontaneous erections).Prevention of local complications of urinary tract infection can prevent relapses of elimination of the posterior urethra strictures and obliterations of traumatic origin in children. The correct implementation of providing the first aid algorithms for urethral injuries, careful prepara-tion and correct execution of the urethral anastomosis surgical manipulation stages using a two-diameter drainage catheter, with the correct selection of antimicrobial agents for parenteral and topi-cal use allowed to achieve good results in 98.0% of cases, including cases of repeated correction at recurrent strictures and obliterations of urethra. The authors declare no conflict of interest. This study does not include the involvement of any budgetary, grant or other funds. The article is published for the first time and is part of a scientific work.
References
[1] | Kitrey N.D. et al., EAU Guidelines on Urological Trauma 2016, Eur. Urol. (2016) 47(1): 1-15. |
[2] | Waterloos M. et al., Journal of Pediatric Urology (2019) 15, 176. e1e176.e7. |
[3] | Darren J. Bryk, Lee C. Zhao, Guideline of guidelines: a review of urological trauma guidelines. BJU Int 2016; 117: 226–234. |
[4] | Nesterov S.N., Khanaliev B.V., Volodichev V.V. and others. Surgical treatment of patients with urethral stricture. In Russian. // Bulletin of the National Medical and Surgical Center named after. N.I. Pirogov. 2016. V. 11. № 4. P. 84-89. |
[5] | Pavlov V.N., Kazikhinurov R.A., Izmailov A.A., et al. Experience in the treatment of urethral strictures using various types of urethroplasty. // Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan. 2017. T. 12. No. 3 (69). P. 60-62. |
[6] | Pavlov V.N., Kazikhinurov R.A., Safiullin R.I., et al. Selection of the optimal method and ways to improve the results of surgical treatment in patients with post-traumatic, inflammatory strictures and obliterations of the urethra. In Russian. // Ural Medical Journal. 2017. No. 2 (146). P. 92-95. |
[7] | Trapeznikova M.F., Bazaev V.V., Urenkov S.B. – Comparative analysis of the results of open and endoscopic operations for obliteration of the posterior urethra in men. In Russian. // Urology. 2004. No. 1. P. 47-54. |
[8] | Arlen A.M., Powell C.R., Hoffman H.T., Kreder K.J. Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in the treatment of urethral strictures: experience using the two-surgeon technique. // Scientific World Journal. 2010. -Vol. 8. -P. 74-79. |
[9] | Banks F.C., Griffin S.J., Steinbrecher H.A., Malone P.S. Aetiology and treatment of symptomatic idiopathic urethral strictures in children. // J. Pediatr. Urol. 2009. - Vol. 5(3). - P. 215-218. |
[10] | Rice-Oxley M. The urethral structure after acquired brain injure. // Clin Rehabil. -2000. - V.14. –N=10. –P.548-550. |
[11] | Nikolaev V.V., Stepanov E.A. Urethral strictures in children. In Russian. // Moscow. "Medicine". 1998; P. 156. |
[12] | Shkuratov S.I. Modern methods of treatment of urethral strictures. In Russian. // Urology - 2002. P. 58-59. |
[13] | Tenke P, Kovacs B, Bjerklund Johansen TE, Matsumoto T, Tambyah PA, Naber KG. European and Asian guidelines on management and prevention of catheter associated urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008; 31S: 68-78. |
[14] | Clinical overview: Bladder and urethral injury. Edited July 18, 2019, PP24. https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/clinical_overview/67-s2.0-03d60fdf-97c6-454b-a02a-da9b98d550b3. |
[15] | Khlebovets N.I., Kharchenko O.F., URINARY SYSTEM INFECTIONS IN CHILDREN. In Russian. // Journal of GSMU 2005 No. 3, P. 119-120. |
[16] | Bukharin O.V., Vyalkova A.A., Grishchenko V.A. Clinical and microbiological substantiation of early diagnosis of pyelonephritis in children. In Russian. // Russian Pediatric Journal, 2003, No. 2. P. 42-47. |
[17] | Galkevich N.V., Kozharskaya L.G. and coauthors. The use of antibacterial therapy in the treatment of urinary tract infections in children. In Russian. // Prescription, 2003, No. 4. - P. 24-26. |