American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

p-ISSN: 2165-901X    e-ISSN: 2165-9036

2023;  13(11): 1808-1812

doi:10.5923/j.ajmms.20231311.44

Received: Oct. 28, 2023; Accepted: Nov. 17, 2023; Published: Nov. 25, 2023

 

Reconstructive Surgery of the Urethra in Men

Ergashev Bobirjon Abdilhashimovich

Andijan State Medical Institute, Andijan, Uzbekistan

Correspondence to: Ergashev Bobirjon Abdilhashimovich , Andijan State Medical Institute, Andijan, Uzbekistan.

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Urethral stricture is a polyethological disease characterized by symptoms of the lower urinary tract, in which the diameter of the urethral lumen narrows down to its complete obliteration due to scar degeneration of the tissues of the urethra wall. The prevalence of narrowing of the urethra in men varies from 0.6% to 0.9% in the population and increases with the age of patients, while extensive and subtotal lesions of the urethra are diagnosed in 15-18% of cases. Urethral strictures are scarring of the urethra that can lead to obstructive and/or irritating symptoms when urinating, regardless of anatomical localization.

Keywords: Reconstructive surgery, Urethra, Men, Strictures, Iatrogeny

Cite this paper: Ergashev Bobirjon Abdilhashimovich , Reconstructive Surgery of the Urethra in Men, American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Vol. 13 No. 11, 2023, pp. 1808-1812. doi: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20231311.44.

1. Introduction

Urethral strictures are more often acquired than congenital. Congenital forms are located mainly in the anterior part of the urethra, usually have a short length and are usually associated with other malformations, such as hypospadias or megalourethra. Acquired forms of urethral stricture are iatrogenic, but there may also be post-inflammatory, caused by various sexual infectious diseases (gonorrhea, chlamydia, etc.), chronic inflammation or post-traumatic conditions.
However, in about 30% of patients, the etiology remains unclear. Age also plays an important role in the causal group.
Recent studies show that urethral strictures in men under the age of 35 mostly have an inflammatory or unclear etiology.
On the contrary, in men over 50 years of age, iatrogenic correlation (post-transurethral surgery, history of catheter insertion) was found in 55% of cases [1,3].
Urethral stricture occurs as a result of scarring of the urethra. There are two responsible factors in pathogenesis. On the one hand, the lesion of the mucous membrane with a local infection, which can subsequently spread to the corpus spongiosum, and on the other hand, the subsequent healing process with the formation of a scar. The so-called spongy fibrosis develops. The more pronounced the scarring, the more severe the stricture [4]. Proximal strictures, which occur as a result of fibrosis after traumatic ruptures of the urethra, differ from them. Distal strictures are a special condition that can occur as a result of non-infectious inflammatory processes of balanitis xerotica obliterans (lichen sclerosus).

2. Diagnostics

A necessary condition for successful therapy is the correct choice of surgical intervention. In preoperative diagnosis, in addition to anamnesis, clinical examination, uroflowmetry (Fig.1 a), urethrocystoscopy, retrograde urethrogram (Fig. 1 b) or alternative urethra cystography are of great importance. This allows you to estimate the localization, length and shape of the stricture. With the help of urethral sonography, under certain circumstances, it is possible to estimate the extent of spongiofibrosis [5-7]. However, this method has not yet found application in everyday clinical practice. Cystoscopy is of particular importance in special cases. In order not to affect the possible subsequent reconstructive intervention, care must be taken not to expand the strictures. Unlike many other diseases in urology, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are less standardized.
Figure 1a. Uroflowmetry
Figure 1b. Retrograde urethrography (arrows indicate strictures of the bulbous urethra)
Figure 1c. Ultrasound of the urethra: A – normal lumen of the bulbous urethra; B – arrows indicate the boundaries of severe stricture of the bulbous urethra

3. The Possibilities of Therapy

Minimally invasive therapy. Augmentation/dilation. Urethral stricture augmentation is the most ancient form of therapy and was used already in the pre-Christian era. During this procedure, spongiose fibrosis expands, and countless microtrauma forms in the scar, which leads to repeated scarring. Therefore, the boogie can only have only a temporary effect on the obstacle.
As a rule, it can be expected that the narrowing will recur in four to six weeks [8]. For this reason, the procedure is only suitable for patients who refuse surgery or are not suitable for this for anesthetic reasons.

4. Endoscopic Urethrotomy (Urethrotomia Interna)

The diverse course of the disease and the high tendency to relapse of the disease present enormous difficulties for everyday clinical practice. The choice of a suitable surgical procedure should be individually adapted to the patient. In general, the distal location, stricture length of more than 2.5 cm and the number of previous operations are considered poor prognostic parameters. Short bulbar strictures (< 1 cm) have a better prognosis with a lower recurrence rate and an endoscopic recovery attempt seems justified. Sachse urethrotomy is the main method of treating strictures of the short urethra. Victims should be informed and clarified in this regard.
However, there are only a few strictures that can be finally eliminated with these measures. For most strictures, the probability of recurrence of the stricture after dissection significantly exceeds is more than 50%. The resulting new stricture is always longer and more difficult to treat than the previous one. After the third urethrotomy, the recurrence rate increases to 100% [9].
The length of the follow-up period seems to be of particular importance for the frequency of relapses when using this technique. Such operations are not indicated for strictures of the penile urethra or navicular fossa [10].
In general, however, due to the poor long-term results of Sachse urethrotomy, on the one hand, and good long-term results of open urethral reconstruction, on the other, repeated urethrotomy should be performed only to those patients for whom open reconstruction is out of the question due to concomitant diseases or who do not want open reconstruction after a detailed consultations [9,11].

5. Open Surgical Reconstruction of the Urethra

First, a distinction should be made between anterior structures and posterior stenoses. The term "urethral stricture" classically refers to anterior structures. With anterior strictures, panel and bulbar structures are distinguished. Posterior stenoses are fundamentally different in genesis and, accordingly, in therapy.

6. Stricture Resection with End-to-End Anastomosis

Short bulbar structures < 2 cm are dissected and resected through the perineal approach. Then the continuity of the two ends of the urethra without tension, mutually converging, is restored by an end-to-end anastomosis. Complete removal of stricture and scar tissue (transsection technique) is crucial for success. The literature reports a long-term success rate of up to 90%. Even as a second operation, end-to-end anastomosis can lead to good success with strictures of the short urethra [12]. In surgery of bulbar relapses, this often avoids replacement urethroplasty, the success rate of which is slightly lower than in end-to-end urethral reconstruction. The question of the effect of repeated surgical intervention on erection, ejaculation and continence remains unresolved in many studies.

7. Reconstruction of the Urethra with the Help of Vascularized Skin Flaps

With the technique using vascularized skin flaps, the urethra opens longitudinally along the entire length of the stricture, and the resulting defect is screwed into the open urethra with the help of a vascularized skin flap of the penis shell, which is prepared on the underlying fascia (Darthos fascia) is inserted into the open urethra. There are various techniques for this, but the blood supply of these "flaps" is always provided through the subdermal connective tissue. These flap methods are a less complex procedure, which in prospective randomized trials has shown comparable results with transplantation methods, but requires a longer operation time and are associated with an increased complication rate (skin necrosis about 15%, fistula formation about 5%) [1,13,14].
Therefore, this is a somewhat outdated surgical technique that can only be used in exceptional cases.

8. Reconstruction of the Urethra with a Free Graft (Foreskin, Oral Mucosa or Thigh Skin)

Open reconstructive procedures are used in complex strictures or in recurrent situations [17-19]. In our clinic, such procedures are performed secondarily for patients who have undergone two endoscopic urethrotomies, and first of all for so-called high-risk patients. High-risk patients are characterized by an extended stricture of more than 5 cm, penile or membranous localization with pronounced spongiofibrosis. We decide to perform a one-stage or multi-stage reconstructive procedure depending on the length of the stricture, the width of the residual lumen and the degree of spongiofibrosis.
Longer strictures require transplantation urethroplasty. Currently, a free graft of the oral mucosa (the inner surface of the cheeks, lips or the lower part of the tongue) is the most common free graft due to its easy availability and low level of complications [20,21]. Numerous other autologous biological materials (foreskin, thigh skin, bladder mucosa, colon mucosa) are used in special cases.
A free, neovascularized graft should be very thin and wide, so that rapid new vascularization is possible due to capillary germination.
In our department, we fundamentally prefer to use free grafts of the oral mucosa. The urethra is fully mobilized in the stricture area and is cut off from the corpora cavernosa. Then the urethra opens longitudinally along the entire length of the stricture (Fig. 2). Then the removed pieces of the oral mucosa (graft) are sewn for plastic expansion of the resulting defect (Fig. 3 a, b).
Figure 2. Longitudinal section of the urethra and measurement of the length of the stricture
Figure 3. A – Free buccal flap. B – Dorsal augmentation of the urethra with a free buccal flap
We carry out a two-stage procedure only in special cases, for example, with complex strictures extending over the entire length of the urethra. It requires two operations with a difference of several months [21]. During the first procedure, the urethra is opened longitudinally along the entire length of the stricture through the penile or perineal approach and is covered with a split skin graft.
The healing of the skin and mucous membrane of the oral cavity in the free state of the graft occurs in two stages:
Phase 1: Imbibition (first 48 hours): feeding through absorption of nutrients from well-supplied blood tissue receiving bed.
Phase 2: Inosculation (within the next 48 hours): germination of new capillaries.
After the completion of the healing phase - usually after three to six months, the second stage is carried out. To do this, the healed graft is dissected from both sides, mobilizes laterally to the corpora cavernosa and a neourethra is inserted. To do this, the healed graft is dissected from both sides, mobilizes laterally to the cavernous body, and the neourethra is formed longitudinally through a catheter (tubularization procedure). In the literature, the recurrence rate for single-stage procedures ranges between 8% and 19%, while the recurrence rate is significantly higher for strictures longer than 5 cm (17%) compared with shorter ones (12%).
Men over 65 also have the same good results after open urethroplasty as younger men. Therefore, the age of the patient is not an excuse to justify long-term endoscopic surgery, which are associated with the most frequent relapses. The technique of two-stage urethroplasty has 45% of relapses. To achieve optimal results, such procedures should be performed only in specialized centers with sufficient experience [22,23].
Different authors describe various surgical techniques for the application of the oral mucosa: for example, the oral mucosa to be transplanted is used as a flap in the "onlay" or "inlay" technique. The different thickness and blood supply of the corpus spongiosum in different parts of the urethra play a crucial role in the choice of surgical technique.
Therefore, the dorsal overlay technique should be used in the penile urethra, and the onlay technique should be used in the bulbar urethra [22,23].

9. Bulboprostatic Anastomosis

A special feature is the reconstruction of the urethra in case of complete occlusion after rupture of the urethra against the background of a serious accident. This is explained by the fact that the obstruction is always located in close proximity to the urethral sphincter and is relatively accessible for surgical reconstruction due to its anatomical location [15]. The procedure of choice for such damage to the urethra is bulboprostatic anastomosis. In this case, the scar tissue formed after the injury is completely removed and a new connection is created between the urethra and the prostate. However, in most cases, it is not possible to preserve the urethral sphincter [15,16].

10. Conclusions

Before planning an operation, it is necessary to carry out sufficient diagnostics. Knowledge of etiology also makes it possible to predict relapse. Standardized perioperative procedures help to avoid complications. The versatility of application of the oral mucosa in any localization and with various techniques and its simplicity of technique make it the most suitable basic material for urethral reconstruction today. The repertoire of a reconstructive surgeon should be broad in order to successfully cope with unexpected and unforeseen situations.

References

[1]  Tritschler S, Roosen A, Füllhase C et al. Urethral stricture: etiology, investigation and treatments. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013; 110: 220 – 226.
[2]  Gozzi C1, Dalpiaz O. Anatomy and anatomical foundations of urethral surgery. Urologe A 2013; 52: 645 – 649.
[3]  Latini JM, McAninch JW, Brandes SB et al. SIU/ICUD Consultation On Urethral Strictures: Epidemiology, etiology, anatomy, and nomenclature of urethral stenoses, strictures, and pelvic fracture urethral disruption injuries. Urology 2014; 83: S1 – 7 (Review).
[4]  Talreja SM, Tomar V, Yadav SS et al. Comparison of sonoelastography with sonourethrography and retrograde urethrography in the evaluation of male anterior urethral strictures. Turk J Urol 2016; 42: 84 – 91.
[5]  Bryk DJ, Khurana K, Yamaguchi Y et al. Outpatient Ultrasound Urethrogram for Assessment of Anterior Urethral Stricture: Early Experience. Urology 2016; 93: 203 – 207.
[6]  Pfalzgraf D, Häcker A. Sachse internal urethrotomy: endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures . Urologe A 2013; 52: 657 – 661.
[7]  Pal DK, Kumar S, Ghosh B. Direct visual internal urethrotomy: Is it a durable treatment option? Urol Ann 2017; 9: 18 – 22.
[8]  Siegel JA, Panda A, Tausch TJ et al. Repeat Excision and Primary Anastomotic Urethroplasty for Salvage of Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture. J Urol 2015; 194: 1316 – 1322.
[9]  Hussein MM, Moursy E, Gamal W et al. The use of penile skin graft versus penile skin flap in the repair of long bulbo-penile urethral stricture: a prospective randomized study. Urology 2011; 77: 1232 – 1237.
[10]  Dubey D, Vijjan V, Kapoor R et al. Dorsal onlay buccal mucosa versus penile skin flap urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures: results from a randomized prospective trial. J Urol 2007; 178: 2466 – 2469.
[11]  Barbagli G, Montorsi F, Guazzoni G et al. Ventral oral mucosal onlay graft urethroplasty in nontraumatic bulbar urethral strictures: surgical technique and multivariable analysis of results in 214 patients. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 440 – 447.
[12]  Barbagli G, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M. One-stage bulbar urethroplasty: retrospective analysis of the results in 375 patients. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 828 – 833.
[13]  Arlen AM, Powell CR, Hoffman HT et al. Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in the treatment of urethral strictures: experience using the two-surgeon technique. Scientific World Journal 2010; 10: 74 – 79.
[14]  Riechardt S, Fisch M. Two-stage urethroplasty with buccal mucosa. BJU Int 2012; 109: 150 – 162.
[15]  Warner JN, Wisenbaugh ES, Martins FE. Bulbar urethral stricture: How to optimise the use of buccal mucosal grafts. Arab J Urol 2016; 14: 78 – 83.
[16]  Pavone C, Fontana D, Giacalone N et al. Urethroplasty with dorsal buccal mucosa graft. Is it still the method of choice in long term urethral stenosis? Arch Ital Urol Androl 2017; 89: 42 – 44.
[17]  Theisen K, Fuller TW, Bansal U et al. Safety and Surgical Outcomes of Same-day Anterior Urethroplasty. Urology 2017; 102: 229 – 233. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
[18]  Levy ME, Elliott SP. Graft Use in Bulbar Urethroplasty. Urol Clin North Am 2017; 44: 39 – 47 (Review).
[19]  Fenner V, Benamran DA, Tran SN et al. Bulbomembranous anastomotic urethroplasty for strictures of the proximal bulbar urethra unassociated with pelvic trauma. Int J Urol 2017: DOI: 10.1111/iju.1334.
[20]  Knispel H, Stuerzebecher B et al. Clinical applications of autologous tissue-engineered oral mucosa graft forurethroplasty – An efficacy assessment. Urologe A Supplements 2014 (Suppl. 01).
[21]  Mundy AR, Andrich DE. Urethral strictures. BJU Int. 2011 Jan; 107(1): 6-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09800.x. PMID: 21176068.
[22]  Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Verze P, De Nunzio C, Vitarelli A, Carmignani L, Contemporary Urethral Stricture Characteristics in the Developed World, Urology, Volume 81, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 191-197, ISSN 0090-4295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.062.
[23]  Bayne, D. B., Gaither, T. W., Awad, M. A., Murphy, G. P., Osterberg, E. C., & Breyer, B. N. (2017). Guidelines of guidelines: a review of urethral stricture evaluation, management, and follow-up. Translational andrology and urology, 6(2), 288.