Shekhovtsov Stanislav Alexandrovich1, 2, Davlatov Salim Sulaymonovich2
1A Leading Multi-Specialty Clinic Addu City, Republic of Maldives
2Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali Ibn Sino
Correspondence to: Shekhovtsov Stanislav Alexandrovich, A Leading Multi-Specialty Clinic Addu City, Republic of Maldives.
| Email: |  |
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract
The article presents an analysis of factors that have the potential to influence the results of laser ablation of short, complex rectal fistulas using the FiLAC technique. A statistical analysis of the significance of these factors was carried out. The analysis carried out during the study, including the assessment of the Odds Relationship, showed that such parameters as: gender, history of the disease, anatomy of the location of the fistula, the diameter of the internal opening of the fistula, the presence of concomitant pathology did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect on the risk of recurrent fistula in patients with short fistulous course in both groups. However, the use of more powerful laser radiation against the background of prolonged exposure to the walls of the fistula leads to a significant improvement in the results of treatment of patients with complex short fistulas.
Keywords:
Short rectal fistulas, Complex rectal fistulas, Laser obliteration of rectal fistulas, FiLAC technique
Cite this paper: Shekhovtsov Stanislav Alexandrovich, Davlatov Salim Sulaymonovich, Analysis of Factors Influencing the Results of the Laser Obliteration Technique of Short and Complex Rectal Fistulas, American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Vol. 13 No. 7, 2023, pp. 913-916. doi: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20231307.15.
1. Introduction
Despite the centuries that have passed since the first mention of rectal fistulas, the problem of their treatment continues to be relevant. In the last decade, there has been a breakdown in the paradigm of treatment of this pathology. Radical methods, but fraught with a high risk of anal incontinence, are replaced by minimally invasive and, most importantly, sphincter-preserving methods of treating rectal fistulas. Moreover, this direction continues to develop intensively. LIFT, Plug, and VAAFT procedures, which were considered very modern 10 or 20 years ago, fade into the background compared to such techniques as: Over the scope clip (using a special endoscopic nitinol clip with shape memory), FiLAC (elimination of fistulas using a laser) [1,3,7,12,16,17,19].One of the promising sphincter-preserving techniques is laser obliteration of the fistula by the FiLAC method. Despite the already achieved, encouraging results of the use of this technique and its gaining momentum in a wide proctological practice, many aspects related to the use of this technique continue to be poorly studied or not studied at all. Thus, a systematic review of international literature to identify factors that may influence the results of the use of FiLAC technology showed that no more than 2 dozen papers were devoted to this topic. At the same time, they demonstrate very contradictory indicators on a number of studied aspects. For example, only 6 publications were found devoted to the problem of the influence of the anatomical location of the fistula passage in relation to the anal sphincter on the frequency of healing of fistulas after the application of the FiLAC technique. Analysis of the effect of the length of the fistula canal on the healing results also shows contradictory results. Giamundo P. (2015) in his work noted that the best result is achieved with long, more than 4 cm long fistulas [10,11]. On the contrary, Ozturk E. (2014) recorded healing of the fistula in 82% of cases with a length of the fistula not exceeding 4.5 cm [18]. An important point should be noted. In all the publications studied, the use of a diode laser with a wavelength of 1470 nm was noted. and power from 12 to 13 watts. Only in the work of Marref I. et al. (2019) the use of laser radiation of various power (from 12 to 15 watts) was noted.The purpose of the study: To improve the quality of treatment of patients with short and complex rectal fistulas.
2. Materials and Methods of Research
Taking into account the current situation, in order to identify factors that may influence the results of using the FiLAC technique, we carried out a randomized, single-center, comparative clinical trial in which an assessment of the odds ratio (OR) was used depending on the presence or absence of various components. In total, 8 factors were analyzed: the gender of patients, the duration of the course of the disease, the anatomy of the location of the fistula, the diameter of the internal opening of the fistula, the occurrence of relapse of the disease, the occurrence of postoperative complications, the healing time of the surgical wound, the presence of concomitant pathology. The study was performed on 62 patients with transsphincteric and extrasphincteric fistulas of the rectum using the Cherylas-15N device (manufacturer Wuhan Dimed Laser Technology Co., Ltd., China) and the Lightguide SA600 light guide with radial energy radiation of the same manufacturer. The data on these patients were divided into two equivalent groups. The first group is the main group (MG). In it, laser obliteration of the fistula was performed using a diode laser with a wavelength of 1470 nm. and a power of 14 watts. The extraction speed of the light guide at the same time was 1 mm / 3 seconds. The second group is the comparison group (CG). In it, laser obliteration of the fistula was performed according to the classical technique using a diode laser with a power of 12 watts and a wavelength of 1470 nm. The extraction speed of the light guide at the same time was 1 mm / 1 second. In both groups, the length of the fistula did not exceed 4 centimeters.The patients included in the study were selected on the following principles:• age over 18;• patients with transsphincteric fistulas;• patients with extrasphincteric fistulas of 1-2 degrees of complexity;• the presence of a fistula passage not exceeding 4 centimeters in length;• patients with primary and recurrent fistulas;• absence of additional fistula passages and congestion;• absence of rough deformation of the mucosa in the area of the internal opening of the fistula;• the width of the inner opening of the fistula passage not exceeding 5 mm;As a result, 31 patients were included in both groups who fully met the criteria described above.The results of the study. The analysis of the obtained materials showed the following results. In the Main Group, healing occurred in 23 (74.1%) of 31 patients. In the Comparison Group, healing occurred in 19 (61.2%) patients out of 31. Analyzing the results of the use of different laser radiation power and the duration of its effect on the walls of the fistula in both groups, we obtained an OR (Odds Ratio) equal to 1.211 (greater than 1), which suggests that the use of laser radiation power equal to 14 watts and the extraction speed of the fiber equal to 1 mm \ 3 sec has a positive effect on the result treatment, increasing the probability of healing by 12.1 times.The effect of the gender of patients on the frequency of healing showed the following results. Both groups turned out to be equivalent in terms of the sexual composition of patients. The Main Group included 21 (67%) men and 10 (33%) women. The Comparison Group included 19 (61%) men and 12 (39%) women. When comparing the effect of the sex of patients in both groups of men, we obtained an OR (Odds Ratio) equal to 0.436 (less than 1) in men and 0.870 (less than 1) in women, which suggests that the influence of the gender of patients does not significantly affect the results of treatment.Analysis of the duration of the disease showed the following. In the Main Group, in 5 patients, the duration of the disease did not exceed 6 months, in 10 patients - 12 months, in 12 patients - 24 months, in 4 patients, the duration of the disease exceeded 24 months, with an average duration of the disease equal to 20 (1-48) months. In the Comparison Group, in 8 patients, the duration of the disease did not exceed 6 months, in 11 patients - 12 months, in 5 patients - 24 months, in 4 patients, the duration of the disease exceeded 24 months, with an average duration of the disease equal to 22 (1-56) months. In both groups, we received an OR (Odds Ratio) equal to 0.767 (less than 1), which indicates that the influence of anamnesis lasting up to 1 year does not significantly affect the results of treatment. When comparing the effect of the anamnesis of patients lasting more than 1 year, in both groups we obtained an OR (Odds Ratio) equal to 0.592 (less than 1), which suggests that the effect of anamnesis lasting more than 1 year also does not significantly affect the results of treatment.The study of the location of the fistula revealed the following. In 19 (61%) patients from the Comparison Group, a transsphincteric fistula passed through a superficial or deep portion of the external sphincter. 12 (39%) patients of the same group had an extrasphincteric fistula of 1-2 degrees of complexity. In The Main Group transsphincteric fistula passing through the superficial or deep portion of the external sphincter was detected in 22 (70%) patients. Extrasphincteric fistula of 1-2 degrees of complexity was detected in 9 (30%) patients from the same group (Table 1).Table 1. Distribution of anatomical variants of the localization of the fistula and their degrees of complexity in the studied groups  |
| |
|
The calculation of the OR (Odds Ratio) in patients with a transsphincteric location gave a number equal to 0.731 (less than 1), which indicates the absence of the influence of the transsphincteric location of the fistula course on the result of treatment. When comparing patients with an extrasphincteric location, in both groups we obtained an OR (Odds Ratio) equal to 0.648 (less than 1), which indicates the same absence of a significant impact on the results of treatment.Analysis of the diameter of the internal opening of the fistula showed that in the Main Group 17 (55%) patients had a diameter of the internal opening of the fistula up to 3 mm and 14 (45%) from 3 to 5 mm, respectively. In the Comparison Group, the diameter of the internal opening of the fistula up to 3 mm was 19 (61%) patients and from 3 to 5 mm - 12 (39%) patients, respectively. Comparing the effects of the diameter of the internal opening of the fistula up to 3 mm in both groups, we obtained an OR (Odds Ratio) equal to 0.781 (less than 1), which suggests that the influence of the diameter of the internal opening of the fistula up to 3 mm does not significantly affect the positive outcome of treatment. When comparing the influence of the diameter of the internal opening of the fistula from 3 to 5 mm in both groups, we obtained an OR (Odds Ratio) equal to 0.767 (less than 1), which also suggests that the influence of the diameter of the internal opening of the fistula from 3 to 5 mm does not significantly affect the positive result of treatment.Concomitant diseases were present in 19 (61%) patients in the Main Group and in 13 (42%) patients in the Comparison Group. The analysis of the presence of concomitant pathology in patients in both groups showed the absence of a significant statistical difference in the frequency of occurrence, despite the sufficient representation in both groups of arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus of both types and chronic hemorrhoids (Table 2).Table 2. Distribution of identified concomitant diseases by patient groups  |
| |
|
When comparing the effect of the presence of concomitant pathology on the results of treatment in patients in both groups, we obtained an OR (Odds Ratio) equal to 0.456 (less than 1), which indicates that the presence of concomitant pathology in patients does not significantly affect the positive outcome of treatment.Evaluation of the healing time of the surgical wound in patients from both groups showed that from the moment of surgery to complete wound healing, it took from 33 to 62 days in the Main Group and from 31 to 56 days in the Comparison Group. At the same time, we determined that the OR (Odds Ratio) in this case is 0.932 (less than 1, but approaching it), which suggests that with a given number of patients, this indicator does not significantly affect the outcome of the disease. However, there is a tendency that an increase in the number of patients subjected to analysis may show a positive effect on the healing time of wounds from the use of laser radiation with a power of 14 watts and a light guide extraction rate of 1 mm \ 3 sec.Analyzing the occurrence of postoperative complications, we had the following results. In the Comparison Group, complications were recorded in the form of acute paraproctitis, which occurred in 4 (13%) patients on the 8th, 11th, 12th and 14th days after the operation, respectively. In the OG, we had a postoperative complication in 1 (3%) patient in the form of acute paraproctitis. Analyzing the results of the occurrence of postoperative complications in both groups, we obtained an OR (Odds Ratio) equal to 4.444 (greater than 1), which suggests that the use of laser radiation power equal to 14 watts and the speed of light guide extraction equal to 1 mm \ 3 sec has a positive effect on the outcome of surgical treatment, reducing the risk of postoperative complications by 44.4 times.
3. Conclusions
The analysis carried out during the study, including the assessment of the Odds Ratio, showed that such parameters as: gender, anamnesis of the disease, anatomy of the location of the fistula, the diameter of the internal opening of the fistula, the presence of concomitant pathology did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect on the risk of recurrence of the fistula in patients with a "short" fistula in both groups. On the contrary, such parameters as: the occurrence of postoperative complications and the frequency of healing showed statistically significantly better results in the case of applying the technique using a radiation power of 14 watts and a light guide extraction speed of 1 mm \ 3 sec. That is, our study showed the absence of any prognostic factors affecting the frequency of healing of complex "short" fistulas. However, the use of more powerful laser radiation against the background of prolonged exposure to the walls of the fistula leads to a significant improvement in the results of treatment of patients with complex "short" fistulas.Information about the source of support in the form of grants, equipment, and drugs. The authors did not receive financial support from manufacturers of medicines and medical equipment.Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest.
References
| [1] | Kuzminov, A.M. Treatment of extrasphincter fistulas of the rectum using bioplastic material / A.M. Kuzminov, Sh. T. Minbaev, V. Y. Korolik, L. P. Orlova, O. Y. Fomenko, N. A. Polyakova, A. A. Safoyan, S. M. Hermez // Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. - 2012. – No. 5. – pp. 76-82. |
| [2] | Khitaryan, A. G. Results of treatment of transsphincter and extrasphincter rectal fistulas using modified FiLAC technology / A. G. Khitaryan, S. A. Kovalev, V. A. Kislov [et al.] // Bulletin of emergency and reconstructive surgery. - 2016. – T. 1, No. 3. – pp. 447-457. |
| [3] | Tsyganov, P. V. Modified VAAFT technique in the treatment of recurrent extrasphincter rectal fistulas / P. V. Tsyganov, V. S. Groshilin, G. A. Mrykhin, A. S. Gaerbekov, V. K. Shvetsov // Coloproctology. – 2020. – Vol. 19, No. S1 (73). – C. 24. |
| [4] | Alexandre, L. FILAC – Fistula – Tract Laser Closure: a sphincter-preserving procedure for the treatment of complex anal fistulas / L. Alexandre, F. Eduardo [et al.] // JCOL. – 2012. – № 37 (2). – P. 160–162. |
| [5] | Altomare, D. F. Anal Fistula closure with FiLaC: new hope or the same old story? / D. F. Altomare. – DOI 10.1007/s10151-015-1347-9 // Tech Coloproctol. – 2015. |
| [6] | Carvalho ALD. FILAC. Fistula-tract laser closure: a sphincter-preserving procedure for the treatment of complex anal fistulas. / Carvalho ALD, Alves Filho EF, Alcantara RSMD, Barreto MDS // Journal of Coloproctology. – 2017. - №37(2). – P. 160–162. |
| [7] | Damian, G.-O. Expanded Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for the Treatment of Complex Perianal Fistula: a Phase II Clinical Trial / G.-O. Damian, H. Dolores. – DOI 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181973487 // Dis. Colon. Rectum. – 2009. – № 52 (1). – P. 79–86. |
| [8] | Fathallah, N. Treatment of fistula-in-ano with laser FiLACTM (Fistula Laser clousure): a new hope / N. Fathallah, M. Aubert, E. Pommaret, V. de Parades, N. Lemarchand. – DOI 10.1007/s11725-015-0622-2 // Colon Rectum. |
| [9] | Garcia-Aguilar J. Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence / Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. // Dis Colon Rectum. -1996. № 39 (7). P. 723-729. |
| [10] | Giamundo, P. Fistula-tract Closure (FiLacTM): long-term results and new operative strategies /P. Giamundo, L. Esercizio // Tech. Coloproctol. – 2015. – № 19. – P. 449–453. |
| [11] | Giamundo, P. Closure of fistula-in-ano-with laser – FiLaC ™: an effective novel sphincter-saving procedure for complex disease / P. Giamundo, M. Geraci [et al.] // Colorectal. Disease. – 2013. – № 16. – P. 110–115. |
| [12] | Johnson, E. K. Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs. fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas / E. K. Johnson, J. U. Gaw, D. N. Armstrong // Dis. Colon. Rectum. – 2006. – № 49. – P. 371–376. |
| [13] | Jordan, J. Risk factors for recurrence and incontinence after anal fistula surgery / J. Jordan, V. Roig, J. Garcia-Armengol, E. Garcia-Granero, A. Solana, S. Liedo // Colorectal Dis. – 2010. – № 33. – P. 254–260. |
| [14] | Lauretta, A. Anal fstula laser closure: the length of fistula is the Achilles’ heel / A. Lauretta, N. Falco, E. Stocco, R. Bellomo, A. Infantino // Tech. Coloproctol. – 2018. – № 22. – P. 933–939. |
| [15] | Marref, I. The optimal indication for FiLaC™ is high trans-sphincteric fstulain-ano: a prospective cohort of 69 consecutive patients / I. Marref, L. Spindler, M. Aubert, N. Lemarchand, N. Fathallah [et al.]. – DOI 10.1007/s10151-019-02077-9 // Tech. Coloproctology – 2019. |
| [16] | Meinero, P. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment: a new concept of treating anal fistulas / P. Meinero, L. Mori, G. Gasloli. – DOI 10.1097/ DCR.0000000000000082 // Dis Colon Rectum. – 2014. – № 57 (3). – P. 354–359. |
| [17] | Ommer, A. Gore BioA Fistula Plug in the treatment of high anal fistulas – initial results from a German multicenter-study / A. Ommer, A. Herold, A. Joos, C. Schmidt, G. Weyand, D. Bussen. – DOI 10.3205/000164 // Ger. Med .Sci. – 2012. |
| [18] | Ozturk, E. Laser ablation of Fistula Tract: A sphincter-preserving method for treating Fistula-in-Ano / E. Ozturk, B. Gulcu // Dis. Colon. Rectum. – 2014. – № 57. – P. 360–364. |
| [19] | Rojanaskul, A. Total anal sphincter technique for fistula-in-ano: the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract / A. Rojanaskul, J. Pattanaarun, C. Sahakitrungruagruang, K. Tantiphlachiva // Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. – 2007. – № 90. – P. 581–586. – URL: http://www.medassocthai.org/journal. |