American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

p-ISSN: 2165-901X    e-ISSN: 2165-9036

2021;  11(5): 367-372

doi:10.5923/j.ajmms.20211105.03

Received: Apr. 11, 2021; Accepted: Apr. 30, 2021; Published: May. 7, 2021

 

Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Patients with Multi-vessel Coronary Artery Disease

Abdurakhmanov A. A., Anvarov Kh. E.

Republican Research Centre of Emergency Medicine, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

The aim of the study was retrospective analysis of the single center experience with off-pump coronary artery bypass graft in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Introduction. Surgical revascularization in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease still raises many questions. Material and methods. This retrospective study includes 1221 patients with coronary artery disease operated in the department of cardiac surgery in the Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine in 2013-2020. 1000 patients (81.9%) were male and 221(18.1%) female, average age 56.2 ± 0.9 years. Results. In the early postoperative period 41 patients died, hospital mortality was 3.3%. In 60 cases off-pump to on-pump coronary artery bypass graft conversion was made (conversion rate – 4.9%). In the univariate analysis, we observed that a history of acute myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, and COPD were not a risk factor for death, while an unstable state on admission (OC 15.38, CI -4.86-48.6 p0.0001) and conversion to on-pump for emergency indications (OR - 30.25, CI - 9.46 - 96.7, p<0.0001) can be considered reliable risk factors for the development of the lethal outcome in the early postoperative period, a low ejection fraction also showed a high probability of a mortality, but the variables were not statistically significant (OR = 1.07, CI = 0.44-2.57, p = 0.88). Follow-up was completed in 89.9% (1098 of 1221 patients) of the patients. During the follow-up period (2-48 months on average 24.1 ± 0.34), 12 (1.1%) patients died. Freedom from the combined endpoint of cardiac death and myocardial infarction, was 97.1% at 40 months; freedom from recurrent angina was 92.3% and freedom from repeated revascularization was 99.1%. Conclusion. Patients with multivessel coronary disease and unstable angina in most cases can undergo to off-pump coronary artery bypass graft with favorable early results. Haemodynamical problems can force surgeon to turn on-pump. Emergent on pump conversion following haemodynamical instability can be a significant factor for mortality. In our series coronary artery bypass graft surgery showed favorable immediate and mid-term results.

Keywords: Coronary artery bypass graft, Coronary artery disease, Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft

Cite this paper: Abdurakhmanov A. A., Anvarov Kh. E., Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Patients with Multi-vessel Coronary Artery Disease, American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Vol. 11 No. 5, 2021, pp. 367-372. doi: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20211105.03.

1. Introduction

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) occupies a special place in the treatment of coronary heart disease (IHD). Its effectiveness in eliminating the symptoms of angina pectoris, and increasing the life expectancy in some patient groups is currently undeniable. There are two methods of surgical revascularization of the cardiovascular system: a standard procedure of CABG with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump), and CABG on beating heart (off-pump) [1-2]. Since the late 1990, beating heart CABG has become increasingly popular, as a result of introduction in clinical practice of devices that stabilize the heart for the application of anastomosis [1-4]. In the literature and modern periodical publications, we can note an active discussion about how, whichever method is preferred. A number of authors indicate a low efficiency of off-pump CABG associated with the risk of incomplete revascularization, and as a consequence of perioperative myocardial infarction and late graft failure [1,5-8]. Other authors emphasize the absence of statistically significant differences in the mortality rate, postoperative complications, infarction and stroke in the postoperative period, as well as other advantages and disadvantages when comparing both methods, emphasizes the same duration of functioning of shunts in the long-term follow-up period [3,9-10]. Other researchers pay attention to the efficacy and safety of the method on the beating heart, both in patients with low and high risk [2,11-12]. In particular, according to the latest publications, off pump myocardial revascularization is accompanied by a short period of stay in the intensive care unit, a reduction in ventilation time and hospitalization, a low rate of atrial fibrillation, blood transfusions compared to conventional CABG, a low requirement for inotropic support, low incidence of respiratory tract infections, stroke, delirium and postoperative myocardial infarction [11,13-15].
The aim of the study was a retrospective analysis of the single center immediate and mid-term results of off-pump CABG in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

2. Material and Methods

This retrospective study includes 1221 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) operated in the department of cardiac surgery in the Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine in 2013-2020. 1000 patients (81.9%) were male and 221(18.1%) female, average age 56.2 ± 0.9 years. The initial patients data are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Initial Patients characteristics (n = 1221)
     
Duration of the CAD more than 1 year was observed in 83% of patients; 72% of patients had suffered an acute myocardial infarction previously. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 64.9% of patients, myocardial contractility was moderately reduced and was 44.6 ± 4.3. The majority of patients 96% were admitted with unstable angina, the 4% were operated with ongoing acute myocardial infarction.
All patients excepts those who needed off-pump-to -on-pump conversion were operated off-pump, standard deep pericardial stitches, Trandelenburg position, operating table rotations, volume preload and / or cardiotonic support were used to provide hemodynamic stability. During the procedure we prefer to use the standard mechanical platform stabilizer over vacuum stabilizers (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Intraoperative photo. Autovenous bypass on the Cx artery using stabilizer and deep pericardial stitches
In most cases, (94.8%), the left anterior descending artery was bypassed using the left internal thoracic artery (LIMA-LAD), the mean number of grafted vessels was 3.2.

3. Results

The immediate results of the hospital period, including hospital mortality and complications of the postoperative period were evaluated. In the early postoperative period, 41 patients died, hospital mortality was 3.3%. Among the causes of mortality there were perioperative myocardial infarction – 15(1.2%); low cardiac output syndrome – 21(1.7%), complex rhythm disturbances - 7(0.6%); pulmonary artery embolism – 3 (0.2%) and stroke – 1(0.1%) (some patients suffered two or more complications, leading to mortality).
In 60 cases, off-pump to on-pump CABG conversion was made (conversion rate –4.9%), of which, in 29 (2.4%) cases, the conversion was made urgently due to severe haemodynamical destabilization. In the remaining 31 (2.5%) patients, the conversion was performed in a planned manner for anatomical reasons, due to the inaccessibility of the vessels or large left ventricle. In the univariate analysis, we observed that a history of acute myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, and COPD were not a risk factor for death, while an unstable state on admission (OC 15.38, CI -4.86-48.6 p0.0001) and conversion to on-pump for emergency indications (OR - 30.25, CI - 9.46 - 96.7, p<0.0001) can be considered reliable risk factors for the development of the lethal outcome in the early postoperative period, a low ejection fraction also showed a high probability of a mortality, but the changes were not statistically significant (OR = 1.07, CI = 0.44-2.57, p = 0.88) (Table 2).
Table 2. Univariate analysis of predictors for mortality
     
The duration of patients stay in the ICU after surgery was 2.4 ± 0.5. The duration of the postoperative period in the clinic was 9.8 ± 0.9 days.
Midterm Outcome
Follow-up was completed in 89.9% (1098 of 1221 patients) of the patients. During the follow-up period (2-48 months on average 24.1 ± 0.34), 12 (1.1%) patients died, main causes of death were acute heart failure due to myocardial infarction 7 (0.6%) and gastrointestinal bleeding 3 (0.3%) (mid-term follow-up data are presented in Table 3).
Table 3. Causes of mortality during the mid-term follow-up (n = 12)
     
Freedom from the combined endpoint of cardiac death and myocardial infarction, was 97.1% at 40 months (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curve - survival of patients in the 40 month follow-up period
During the follow-up period of 40 month - 86 (7.7%) patients complained on recurrence of anginous chest pain. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that freedom from recurrent angina was 92.3% (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curve - freedom from the recurrence of angina pectoris
Those patients, who had complained on angina recurrence, were examined using multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) - figure 4.
Figure 4. MSCT coronary angiography allows assessing the state of grafts
Autovenous grafts are visualized to the system of left coronary and right coronary arteries, as well as LITA anastomosed LAD. On coronary angio the stenosis of the venous graft to Cx artery was diagnosed.
When there were signs of stenosis on MSCT angiography, the patients underwent angiographic examination. Coronary angio with graft visualisation, allowed precisely diagnose the graft or native vessel stenosis, these patients needed repeat revascularisation. Repeat revascularization was required only in 2 patients, one patient showed progression of atherosclerosis in native vessels and another showed distal graft stenosis treated effectively by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) - freedom from repeated revascularization was 99.1% (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier curve - freedom from repeated revascularization

4. Discussion

Since its invention in 1960 coronary artery bypass grafting has been a standard procedure in treatment of multiple coronary artery stenosis. Off-pump CABG technique can reduce the morbidity associated with cardiopulmonary bypass, which can lead to severe systemic inflammatory responses [1,16-18]. Some recent studies and meta-analyses have proven the safety and effectiveness of OPCAB with favorable early outcomes and has described OPCAB as a safe alternative to conventional CABG, regarding to death rate and postoperative morbidity [1,11,14,12,19]. On the other hand, many authors have underlined that off-pump surgery can lead to incomplete revascularization [5-7,20]. Some studies have showed that [1,6-7,18] the mean number of bypass grafts in off-pump patients was significantly smaller than that in on-pump patients. Complete myocardial revascularization is one of the important goals of CABG, although the definition of completeness differs among studies. Kleisli and colleagues [20] demonstrated that the 5-year survival rate of complete revascularization was superior to that of incomplete revascularization (82.4% versus 52.6%). In their report, the anatomic reasons for incompleteness were small, such as severely diseased, arteries, nondominant right coronary artery, the presence of prior infracted tissue, significant collateral circulation, and lack of conduit availability. In our series 5 year survival after off-pump CABG was 97,1%. Toshihiro Fukui and colleagues have revealed that the number of distal anastomoses per patient (3.6±1.4) in their study was similar to that in the on-pump patients [17], and complete revascularization was achieved in 99.2% of patients. In the present study the number of distal anastomoses per patient (3.6) was the same as in Toshihiro Fukui’s study. We can state that complete myocardial revascularization using an off-pump technique can be safely performed, and this method is fully reproducible. Despite the fact that early outcome shows excellent results, there are still lack of information on the midterm and long-term outcomes after OPCAB [2-5,17]. Sabik and colleagues [19] in their work described the equivalent midterm outcomes after off-pump and on-pump CABG, 4-year survival after OPCAB was 87.5%. The results of the present study, with a 40 month survival rate and freedom from cardiac death of 97.1% ± 0.6%, are almost identical to those of previous studies. The reduction of graft patency can increase the need for repeat revascularization with time. Puskas and coworkers [21] revealed that graft patency in OPCAB patients is similar to that in conventional CABG patients at 30 days (99.0% versus 97.7%) and 1 year (93.6% versus 95.8%) after surgery. In present study 90,4% of patients complained on angina recurrence, but overall early graft patency rate was 99.1% what is almost identical to their results. Based on our results we suppose that the same early graft patency rate can be obtained in patients treated with OPCAB as compared with those undergoing conventional CABG. Some investigators stated that SVG is associated with reduced patency rate in patients undergoing OPCAB [22]. In present work most grafts were SVG it means that even SVG can demonstrate good mid-term patency. There are still some patients who cannot be treated with OPCAB, such as those with a large heart and impaired left ventricular function or intramyocardial coronary arteries, which sometimes can lead to off-pump to on-pump conversion. Recent studies revealed that off-pump to on-pump conversion can be performed in 5-10% of all cases [23-25]. The rate of performing OPCAB in our isolated CABG patients was 90,8% and overall conversion rate was 9,2% with 55,7% cases being converted urgently due to haemodynamical disturbances. Some studies have underlined that conversion can be an independent risk factor for mortality in early postoperative period [25-26]. Our findings also support these data, mortality rate were higher among urgently converted patients. A recent meta-analysis clearly revealed the favorable outcomes of OPCAB [1,18], and concluded that OPCAB should be considered a safe alternative to conventional CABG with respect to mortality risk. Similar completeness of myocardial revascularization and graft patency can be achieved by OPCAB procedures using modern technology and techniques. Thus, we suggest that OPCAB should be performed whenever possible in patients undergoing isolated CABG.

5. Conclusions

Patients with multivessel coronary disease and unstable angina in most cases can undergo to off-pump CABG with favorable early results. Anatomical peculiarities and haemodynamical problems can force surgeon to turn on-pump. Emergent on pump conversion following haemodynamical instability can be a significant factor for mortality. In our series CABG showed favorable immediate and mid-term results. MSCT can be informative method to assess patients with recurrence angina.

References

[1]  Afilalo J, Rasti M, Ohayon SM, Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ. Off Pump Vs on Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Maetanalysis and Meta Regression of Randomized Clinical Trials. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33(10): 1257–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr307. [PubMed]
[2]  Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2002; 359: 1194–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08216-8. [PubMed]
[3]  De Jaegere PP, Suyker WJL. Off pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart. 2002; 88(3): 313–318. [PubMed]
[4]  Duhaylongsod F. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery defined. ArchSurg. 2000; 135: 296–301. [PubMed]
[5]  Hannan EL, Wu C, Smith CR. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization. Circulation. 2007; 116: 1145–1152. [PubMed]
[6]  Alamanni F, Dainese L, Naliato M, Gregu S, et al. On- and off-pump coronary surgery and perioperative myocardial infarction: an issue between incomplete and extensive revascularization European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Volume 34, Issue 1, 1 July 2008, Pages 8-126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.03.031.
[7]  Guerra M, Mota JC. Impact of incomplete surgical revascularization on survival. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb; 14(2): 176–182. Published online 2011 Nov 28. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr080 PMCID: PMC3279977 PMID: 22159258.
[8]  Raja SG, Benedetto U. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Misperceptions and misconceptions. World J Methodol. 2014; 4(1): 6-10. Published 2014 Mar 26. doi:10.5662/wjm.v4.i1.6.
[9]  Gaudino M, Angelini GD, Antoniades C, et al. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: 30 Years of Debate. J AmHeartAssoc. 2018; 7(16): e009934.
[10]  Davierwala PM. Current outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: evidence from real world practice. J ThoracDis. 2016; 8 (Suppl 10): S772-S786.
[11]  Bittner HB, Savitt MA. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases morbidity and mortality in a selected group of high-risk patients. AnnThoracSurg. 2002; 74: 115–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03646-9. [PubMed]
[12]  Joo HC, Youn YN, Chang BC, Yoo KJ. The feasibility and safety of off-pump coronary bypass surgery in emergency revascularization. J ThoracDis. 2018; 10(4): 2268-2278.
[13]  Roach G, Kanchuger M, Mangano C. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 1857–1863. [PubMed]
[14]  Cleveland JC, Jr, Shroyer AL, Chen AY. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 72: 1282–1288. [PubMed]
[15]  Parissis H, Mbarushimana S, Ramesh BC, et al. The impact of off-pump surgery in end-organ function: practical end-points. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015; 10: 159. Published 2015 Nov 10. doi:10.1186/s13019-015-0362-2.
[16]  Young RW. Prevention of lung injury in cardiac surgery: a review. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014; 46(2): 130-41.
[17]  Fukui T, Takanashi S, Hosoda Y, Suehiro S. Early and midterm results of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Jan; 83(1): 115-9.
[18]  Reston, James & Tregear, Stephen & Turkelson, Charles. (2003). Meta-Analysis of Short-Term and Mid-Term Outcomes Following Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 76. 1510-5. 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01195-0.
[19]  Sabik, Joseph F et al. Equivalent midterm outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary surgery. The Journal of Thoracicand Cardiovascular Surgery, Volume 127, Issue 1, 142 – 148.
[20]  Kleisli T, Cheng W, Jacobs MJ, Mirocha J, et al. In the current era, complete revascularization improves survival after coronary artery bypass surgery. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Volume 129, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1283-1291, ISSN 0022-5223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.12.034.
[21]  Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004; 291: 1841–9.
[22]  Omeroglu SN, Kirali K, Guler M, et al. Midterm angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 844 –9.
[23]  Yoon SS, Bang JH, Jeong SS, Jeong JH, Woo JS. Risk Factors of On-Pump Conversion during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 50(5): 355-362.
[24]  Keeling B, Thourani V, Aliawadi G, et al. Conversion From Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting to On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct; 104(4): 1267-1274. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.03.032. Epub 2017 Jun 11. PMID: 28610886.
[25]  LimJ, LeeWY, RaYJ, JeongJH, KoHH. Analysis of Risk Factors for Conversion from Off-Pump to On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 50(1): 14-21.
[26]  Chakravarthy M, Prabhakumar D, Patil T, George A, Jawali V. Conversion during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A case–control study. Ann Card Anaesth 2019; 22: 18-23.