[1] | Agarwal K. et al. Visibility of strings after postplacental intracesarean insertion of CuT380A and Cu375 intrauterine contraceptive device: a randomized comparative study // The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. – 2017. – Т. 67. – №. 5. – С. 324-329. |
[2] | An A. V., Pakhomovа, E. J. the Critical state for obstetric hemorrhage //Questions of gynecology, obstetrics and Perinatology. - 2010. - Vol. 9. - No. 4. - P. 33-37. |
[3] | Atakhodzhayeva F. A., Fazliddinova F. N. The use of intrauterine contraception in the postpartum period // Problems of biology and medicine. -2013. - No. 4. - page 18. |
[4] | Ayupova F. M., Khamdamova M. T. Clinical aspects of the use of copper-containing intrauterine contraceptives // Uzbekistan tibbet journal. -2010. № 6. 59-64. |
[5] | Bayoumi Y. A. et al. Post-placental intrauterine device insertion vs puerperal insertion in women undergoing caesarean delivery in Egypt: a 1 year randomised controlled trial // The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. – 2020. – С. 1-6. |
[6] | Boydell N. et al. Women’s experiences of accessing postpartum intrauterine contraception in a public maternity setting: a qualitative service evaluation //The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. – 2020. – С. 1-9. |
[7] | Çelen Ş. et al. Immediate postplacental insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device during cesarean section // Contraception. – 2011. – Т. 84. – №. 3. – С. 240-243. |
[8] | Colwill A. C. et al. Six-week retention after postplacental copper intrauterine device placement //Contraception. – 2018. – Т. 97. – №. 3. – С. 215-218. |
[9] | Curtis K. M., Peipert J. F. Long-acting reversible contraception //New England Journal of Medicine. – 2017. – Т. 376. – №. 5. – С. 461-468. |
[10] | Dall’Asta A., Ghi T., Frusca T. Doppler Diagnosis //Fetal Growth Restriction. – Springer, Cham, 2019. – С. 139-170. |
[11] | Dubossarskaya Z. M. analysis of the application of modern methods of postpartum contraception //Reproductive health. Eastern Europe, 2018, Pp. 32-34. |
[12] | Elsokary A., Elkhyat A., Elshwaikh S. Evaluation of Post-Placental IUD Insertion during Cesarean Section at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Egypt // Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. – 2020. – Т. 10. – №. 4. – С. 516-525. |
[13] | Emarah M. A. et al. Predicting successful use of post-placental intrauterine contraceptive device by ultrasound //Menoufia Medical Journal. – 2020. – Т. 33. – №. 2. – С. 440. |
[14] | Hochmuller J. T. et al. Expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period // Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association. – 2020. – Т. 21. – №. 3. – С. 143. |
[15] | Goldstuck N. D., Steyn P. S. Insertion of intrauterine devices after cesarean section: a systematic review update // International journal of women's health. – 2017. – Т. 9. – С. 205. |
[16] | Gonzalez J. et al. Ultrasound location of intrauterine devices placed at cesarean section over the first year postpartum // Contraception. – 2020. |
[17] | Lester F. et al. Intracesarean insertion of the Copper T380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial // Contraception. – 2015. – Т. 91. – №. 3. – С. 198-203. |
[18] | Maltseva L. I. the choice of contraception after cesarean section // Questions of gynecology, obstetrics and Perinatology. - 2014. - Vol. 13. - No. 2. - Pp. 88-94. |
[19] | Mikova V. N., Sandakova E. A., Кolomoitseva T. N. Features of the echographic picture of the reproductive system when using various types of intrauterine contraception //Perm medical journal, 2009, Vol. 26, no. 5. |
[20] | Mohamed A. I., Elati I. H. A., Ramadan E. N. Assessment effect of Post Puerperal and Immediate Post Placental Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices Insertion after Cesarean Delivery on Women’s Health // IOSRJNHS. – 2015. – Т. 4. – №. 3. – С. 1-7. |
[21] | Nasirova Z. A., agababyan L. R. post-Placental introduction of intrauterine spirals in women delivered by abdominal route // Problem Reproduktsii. - 2017. - Vol. 23. - no. 2. |
[22] | Ovsepyan L. S. the Role of three-dimensional sonography in predicting the risk of Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system Mirena: dis. - Yerevan state medical University named after M. Heratsi, 2018. |
[23] | Tjahjanto H., Haryuni I. T. Hang-up IUD, new technique for suturing CuT-380A IUD to uterine fundus in immediate postplacental insertion during cesarean delivery: twelve months follow up //Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. – 2014. – С. 132-139. |
[24] | Upmanyu P., Kanhere A. Acceptance of methods of family planning in patients undergoing repeat caesarean section //International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. – 2016. – Т. 5. – №. 4. – С. 976-9. |
[25] | Verest A. et al. Intrauterine device (IUD) migration in cesarean delivery scar: What to do with the niche? //Facts, Views & Vision in Obgyn. – 2019. – Т. 11. – №. 3. – С. 251. |
[26] | Whitaker A. K., Chen B. A. Society of Family Planning Guidelines: Postplacental insertion of intrauterine devices // Contraception. – 2018. – Т. 97. – №. 1. – С. 2-13. |
[27] | Wildemeersch D., Goldstuck N. D., Hasskamp T. Current status of frameless anchored IUD for immediate intracesarean insertion //Dev Period Med. – 2016. – Т. 20. – №. 1. – С. 7-15. |
[28] | Wildemeersch D. A., Goldstuck N. D., Janssens D. R. G. Immediate Post Placental Insertion of IUD-The Challenge to Solve the Expulsion Problem // Obstet Gynecol Int J. – 2014. – Т. 2. – №. 5. – С. 00052. |
[29] | Zaconeta A. M. et al. Intrauterine Device Insertion during Cesarean Section in Women without Prenatal Contraception Counseling: Lessons from a Country with High Cesarean Rates // Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. – 2019. – Т. 41. – №. 8. – С. 485-492. |
[30] | Zhadan Yu. G. the Main aspects of rehabilitation of patients after caesarean section. – 2018. |