American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

p-ISSN: 2165-901X    e-ISSN: 2165-9036

2021;  11(1): 12-14

doi:10.5923/j.ajmms.20211101.03

Received: Nov. 2, 2020; Accepted: Dec. 11, 2020; Published: Dec. 28, 2020

 

Amitriptyline in the Treatment of Early Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Shah TA1, Wazib A.2, Rahman S.2, Kamal FN3

1Department of Medicine, Uttara Adhunik Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh

2Department of Medicine, Enam Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh

3Department of Medicine, Delta Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Correspondence to: Shah TA, Department of Medicine, Uttara Adhunik Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Email:

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Early carpal tunnel syndrome is treated conservatively with weight reduction and symptomatic treatment for sensory complaints. Amitriptyline is a cheap and widely used drug for neuropathic symptoms. This randomized control trial on 80 cases showed that Amitriptyline was superior to placebo in reducing the sensory symptoms of early carpal tunnel syndrome.

Keywords: Amitriptyline, Early carpal tunnel syndrome

Cite this paper: Shah TA, Wazib A., Rahman S., Kamal FN, Amitriptyline in the Treatment of Early Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Vol. 11 No. 1, 2021, pp. 12-14. doi: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20211101.03.

1. Introduction

Compression of the median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel gives rise to signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) [1]. CTS comprise 80-90 percent of all entrapment neuropathies [2]. The exact prevalence is not known, but assumed to be in 1-3.5/100000 range in the subcontinent [3].
The exact cause of CTS is unclear, and hence, it is related to numerous risk factors like pregnancy; occupations involving exposure of the hand and wrist to a high pressure, a high force, repetitive work and vibrating tools and systemic co-morbidities like obesity, thyroid dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, and rheumatoid arthritis [4].
The most common symptoms of CTS are sensory ones – tingling, numbness and pain in hand. These symptoms can occur at any stage of CTS [5]. They are more troublesome at night causing sleep disturbance. The quality of life is hampered significantly among the sufferers [6].
Carpal tunnel syndrome is classified into early, moderate and severe stages, according to severity in nerve conduction study (NCS) [7]. Early CTS has normal routine NCS of median nerve but a relative prolongation of median sensory latency by ≥0.5 ms in median versus ulnar sensory comparison study. Moderate CTS is the one with prolonged median sensory latency and/or distal motor latency. CTS is classified as severe when sensory and/or motor action potentials are reduced (SNAP and CMAP, respectively).
Surgical decompression is indicated in severe CTS and also considered in moderate CTS when conservative treatment fails [8]. Early CTS cases are treated conservatively with advice for weight reduction and symptomatic treatment for sensory complaints [9]. Antiepileptic drugs, tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) and selective serotonin receptor blockers are widely used for symptomatic relief in CTS [10]. Amitriptyline is the cheapest and most prescribed TCA worldwide for depressive disorders, somatoform disorders and neuropathic symptoms [11]. This study was aimed to assess the efficacy of Amitriptyline in relieving the sensory symptoms of early CTS.

2. Methodology

This randomized control trial was conducted in the medicine outpatient of a tertiary level teaching hospital on 80 patients of early carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with sensory symptoms. Diagnosis was confirmed with nerve conduction study. Early CTS was defined as relative prolongation of median sensory latency by ≥0.5 milliseconds in median versus ulnar sensory comparison study, and normal routine median sensory and motor parameters. 40 patients were randomly selected as the intervention group and were prescribed with Amitriptyline. The other 40 patients were taken as control group and were given a placebo.
Amitriptyline was given as 10 mg at night for the initial 2 weeks. Dose was increased to 25 mg at night thereafter in case of inadequate response. The sensory symptoms were evaluated with a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0-10 points subjectively by the patient, at the first visit and then after 2 weeks and 4 weeks. Reduction of score after 4 weeks was compared between the two groups using unpaired T-test.
Formal approval was taken from the ethical review committee of the hospital prior to the study. Study subjects were included after getting their informed consent.

3. Results

Among 80 study subjects, 75 were females (94%). Most of the cases were from 31-50 age groups (81%) [Figure-1]. Obesity (84%), hypothyroidism (14%) and pregnancy (10%) were found as risk factors.
Figure 1. Age distribution of study subjects
Tingling was the most common symptom (100%), followed by numbness (89%) and pain (65%) [Figure-2].
Figure 2. Sensory symptoms in study subjects
Reduction of score in VAS ranged from 0-10, with a mean±standard deviation of 5.8±2.8 in the intervention group. Reduction of score was 0-5 in the control group with mean±standard deviation of 1.3±1.8. This difference was statistically significant with p-value <0.0001 and 95% confidence interval 3.4-5.5. [Table-1]
Table 1. Reduction of VAS score in study subjects
     

4. Discussion

A strong female preponderance was observed in this study, similar to most other studies [12]. Obesity was found as the most prevalent associated factor as found by Alsharif et al [13].
Sensory symptoms assessed over 4 weeks, were reduced more in the intervention group than in the control group. This result is suggestive of the efficacy of Amitriptyline in reducing the sensory symptoms of early CTS.

5. Conclusions

Amitriptyline is superior to placebo as a symptomatic treatment for the sensory symptoms of early CTS.

References

[1]  Ibrahim I, Khan WS, Goddard M, Smitham P. Carpal Tunnel syndrome: A review of recent literature. Open Ortho J. 2012; 6(Supp 1): 69-76.
[2]  Desai K. Carpal tunnel syndrome: the lesion learnt and the points often overlooked in its management. Neurol India. 2018; 66(3): 674-5.
[3]  Kotwal PP, Varshney MN. Carpal tunnel syndrome: current concepts. J Internat Med Sciences Academ. 2011; 24(1): 21-5.
[4]  Masatoshi Y, Takahiro K, Suzuki K, Uneda A, Hirashita K, Yoshino K. Importance of recognizing carpal tunnel syndrome for neurosurgeons: A review. Neuro Med Chir. 2017; 57:172-82.
[5]  Solomon L, Warwick D, Nayagam S. Apley’s Concise System of Orthopedics and Fractures. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
[6]  Zyluk A, Kosovets L. An assessment of the sympathetic function within the hand in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Euro. 2010; 35(5): 402-8.
[7]  El-Magzub MS, Abdala SF, Mustafa ME. Neurophysiologic pattern and severity grading scale of carpal tunnel syndrome in Sudanese patients. J Neurol Neurosci. 2017; 8(4): 213-7.
[8]  Maggard MA, Harness NG, Walter TC, Parikh J. Indication for performing carpal tunnel surgery: Clinical quality measure. 2010; 126(1): 169-79.
[9]  Aulisa L, Tamburrelli F, Padua R, Romanini E, Monaco ML, Padua L. Carpal tunnel syndrome: Indication for surgical treatment based on electrophysiologic study. J Hand Sur. 1998; 23(4): 687-91.
[10]  Iftekharsadat B, Babaei-Ghazani A, Habibzadeh A. The efficacy of 100 and 300 mg Gabapentin in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Iranian J Pharmaceu Research. 2015; 14(4): 1275-80.
[11]  Santos MAO, Bezerra LS, Magalhaes FND. Pharmacological approach for the management of carpal tunnel syndrome associated to diabetic polyneuropathy. Rev Dor. 2015; 16(4): 316-8.
[12]  DeKrom MCTFM, Kester ADM, Knipschild PG, Spaans F. Risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome. American J Epidemiol. 1990; 132(6): 1102-10.
[13]  Alsharif AA, Nasir F, Shi Y, Tian X, Khan AA, Guo YJ. Risk Factors, diagnosis, and treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome: a review. Science Letters. 2017; 5(3): 233-43.