American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

p-ISSN: 2165-901X    e-ISSN: 2165-9036

2020;  10(5): 293-297

doi:10.5923/j.ajmms.20201005.04

 

Comparative Assessment of the Immediate Results after Exenteration of Pelvic Organs with Simultaneous Pelvic Floor Reconstruction in Patients with Local Extended Cervical Cancer

Zakhirova N. N., Tillyashaykhov M. N., Adylkhodjaev A. A., Akhmedov O. M., Umarova N. A., Osmanova E. Z., Saidakhmedova V. A.

Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Center of Oncology and Radiology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

The study analyzed the treatment results of 141 patients with locally extended cervical cancer with T2b-4N0-1M0 stage of disease after anterior pelvic exenteration. The study compares the immediate and long-term results after anterior pelvic exenteration with and without performing the reconstructive phase of the surgery. The age of patients ranged from 32 to 61 years, the mean age was 47.1 years. The authors made a comparative assessment of postoperative complications in 62 (44%) patients after pelvic exenteration without plastic reconstruction of the pelvic floor and in 79 (56%) patients who underwent the reconstructive stage. The possibilities and advantages of pelvic floor plastic reconstruction which reduce the incidence of postoperative complications have been evaluated.

Keywords: Exenteration, Pelvis, Cancer, Cervix, Plastic reconstruction

Cite this paper: Zakhirova N. N., Tillyashaykhov M. N., Adylkhodjaev A. A., Akhmedov O. M., Umarova N. A., Osmanova E. Z., Saidakhmedova V. A., Comparative Assessment of the Immediate Results after Exenteration of Pelvic Organs with Simultaneous Pelvic Floor Reconstruction in Patients with Local Extended Cervical Cancer, American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Vol. 10 No. 5, 2020, pp. 293-297. doi: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20201005.04.

1. Introduction

Cervical cancer (CC) takes the first place among the pathologies of the genitals in developing countries and the third one after cancer of the body of the uterus and ovaries in economically developed countries [1]. According to the WHO, about 370000-500000 new cases of the disease are detected every year in the world. Moreover, in approximately 50% of cases, the disease is already detected at locally extended stages, therefore, the five-year survival rates after surgical treatment of locally advanced cancer of the pelvic organs do not exceed 27.2%. Treatment of patients with locally extended primary and recurrent forms of cervical cancer remains a largely unsolved problem [2-4].
In patients with locally extended forms of cervical cancer (LECC) (when a cervical tumor invades the bladder or rectum), exenteration of small pelvis (ESP) organs is performed: anterior, posterior, or total, depending on the extent of the tumor process. Pelvic exenteration is characterized by high technical complexity and laboriousness, in terms of its effect on the patient’s body it is a very traumatic surgery and belongs to the category of “super-aggressive” surgical interventions [5-6].
When removing the pelvic organs as a single unit, an extensive pelvic floor defect is formed. After ESP, translocation of the small intestine loops into the pelvic cavity, their fixation by adhesions to the pelvic walls and the pelvic floor devoid of peritoneal cover occur; the consequences of radiation therapy are evident pelvic fibrosis, vascular hyalinosis, worsening of vascularization of the pelvic tissues [7-9]. Fixation of the small intestine loops to the irradiated walls of the pelvis can lead to the formation of intestinal obstruction, small intestinal fistulas, recto-vaginal fistulas, lymphocele and abscesses of the small pelvis and pelvic hernias. The above-described group of complications is called "syndrome of empty small pelvis "in the literature [10-12].
A natural question how to fill the empty space in order to prevent the translocation of the small intestine loops into the pelvic cavity arises. Currently, various reconstruction methods are used: omento-plasty, plasty with muscle and skin-muscle flaps, transposition of the blind and sigmoid colon as well as the use of absorbable and non-absorbable materials such as mesh implants [13-15].
Aim: to study the treatment results of patients with locally extended cervical cancer after anterior exenteration of small pelvis organs depending on various methods of pelvic floor reconstruction.

2. Material and Methods

We studied 141 patients with locally extended forms of cervical cancer (LECC) with invasive growth into the bladder, T2b-4aN0-1M0 stage of the disease, with a complicated course, during chemoradiotherapy or relapse of the disease after combined or complex treatment. 12 of the total number of patients were initially identified patients with stage T4aN0-1M0. All studied patients were divided into 2 groups, control and main, and the main group was divided into 3 subgroups (Fig 1).
Figure 1. The distribution of patients in the studied groups
The age of the examined patients ranged from 32 to 61 years, the mean age was 47.1 years. (Fig. 2).
Figure 2. The distribution of patients by age
In the largest number of patients - 122 (86.5%), epidermoid carcinoma with G2 and G3 differentiation was morphologically verified, in 18 patients (12.7%) adenocarcinoma was detected and only one patient (4.8%) had mesonephroid cancer. All patients with different time intervals (from 6 months to 3 years) had a relapse of the disease after receiving combination therapy, continued tumor growth on the background of chemo and / or radiation therapy (Fig.3).
Figure 3. The distribution of patients according to the morphological structure of the tumor
Patients were distributed according to the stages of the disease as follows: (Tab. 1).
Table 1. Distribution of patients according to primary treatment and the disease stages
     
A greater number of patients with relapses and continued growth of the disease were with IIIA-B stage (T3a-bN0-1M0) - 72 (55.8%) cases, with IIB stage of the disease (T2bN0-1M0) this figure was 57 (44.2%). Also, among all the patients examined by us, 11 (7.8%) ones previously had a history of non-radical surgical interventions in non-core medical institutions, which were sent to an oncologist out of time. As a result, after the received chemoradiotherapy, continued tumor growth was observed in 7 (5%) cases and the disease recurrence for 6 months to 1.5 years was revealed in 4 (2.8%) patients. Patients with IVA stage (T4aN0-1M0) were primary, i.e. they were not treated before the planned surgery. The largest number of studied patients were with stage IIB (T2bN0-1M0) - 40.4%, the smaller part was made by patients with stage IVA disease - 8.5%.

3. Results and Discussion

All studied patients were performed anterior ESP with a simultaneous reconstructive stage. The reconstructive stage of the operation at the anterior ESP implies:
1) The choice of urine diversion method;
2) Pelvic floor restoration. This stage of the operation significantly affects the problems of patients’ postoperative rehabilitation and also determines the quality life of their life.
In our study we applied 3 methods of urine diversion: ureterocutaneostomy (UCS) (n = 81) - 57.4%; Bricker’s operation (n = 34) - 24.1% and a heterotopic urinary bladder with appendicostomy (n = 26) - 18.4%. Another objective of the ESP reconstructive phase is the reconstruction of the pelvic floor. In patients of the subgroup I (n = 32), for the reconstruction of the pelvic floor we used the external and internal obturator muscles, the levator muscle of the rectum and the piriformis muscle which were sewn together with vicril in the form of a cascade. In patients of subgroup II (n = 21), a large omentum from which a J-shaped flap was formed on the right or left gastrointestinal vessels was used to reconstruct the pelvic floor, after mobilization from the transverse colon and large curvature of the stomach, it was reduced to the pelvic cavity and was fixed with separate vicryl sutures to the walls of the pelvis and the pelvic floor. For the third subgroup of patients (n = 21) a skin flap which was excised with a subcutaneous fat inlet from the anterior abdominal wall measuring 6x7x12 cm was used for pelvic floor reconstruction. After that, the epidermis layer of the skin flap was removed to the layer of its own dermis, then the formed skin flap was installed in the area of the “empty” pelvic floor and fixed to the pelvic peritoneum.
Assessment of treatment results in patients was carried out in the early (up to 5 days after surgery), late (up to 30 days after surgery) and the long-term postoperative periods (30 days or more after surgery). Table 2 shows the results of a comparative assessment of the nearest complications which are divided into surgical and non-surgical.
Table 2. Direct treatment results of the studied patients in comparative aspect
     
According to the above mentioned, postoperative surgical complications were developed in 59 of 141 patients (41.8%): in the control group - in 31 (22.0%) cases, in the main group – in 25 (17.7%), p <0.05.
Postoperative complications analysis was also carried out by the Clavien-Dindo scale.
Figure 4. Distribution of postoperative complications by the Clavien-Dindo scale
The diagram shows that basically postoperative complications of III degree were observed - 18.4%, while IV degree was developed in 9.9%, V - in 6.1% of patients, and they were more often observed in patients who were not performed pelvic reconstruction. So, in 3 observations we noted necrosis of the flap with the development of peritonitis which led to repeated surgery. Relaparotomy and pelvic sanitation were performed. There was an early intestinal obstruction in one observation, the cause of which was the formation of a hematoma and adhesions having been required repeated surgery.
In total, 10 patients (7.1%) died from complications after ESP. The mean age of dead patients was 58.9 ± 10.3 years and 8 (5.7%) of them belonged to the elderly age group (Tab. 3).
Table 3. Causes of postoperative mortality
     

4. Conclusions

Thus, we can conclude that in patients with locally extended forms of cervical cancer (LECC) who were not performed all stages of ESP, including the reconstructive one, the postoperative period was more difficult due to unsatisfactory immediate and long-term results. It should be noted that the advantage of the reconstruction method that we have developed, which is technically affordable and does not show an evident cosmetic defect, thereby providing more favorable conditions for postoperative rehabilitation of patients. Also, this method does not require the use of expensive tools and / or expensive surgical stapling instrument, suture material. The life quality in dynamics was higher in patients of the main group compared with the control one due to a decrease in postoperative complications, an improvement in the rehabilitation period as a result of the application of various methods of reconstructive and recovery operations after ESP.
We can say that such a superradical surgical intervention as ESP requires a versatile, multidisciplinary approach, starting with careful selection of patients for surgery, preoperative preparation and the selection of the optimal type of anesthesia up to the staged surgery itself. The reconstructive stage of ESP is important because it allows to reduce and / or to prevent complications such as intestinal obstruction, small intestinal fistulas, recto-vaginal and vaginal fistulas, lymphocele, pelvic abscesses and the formation of pelvic hernias. The choice of the most optimal type of urine derivation and reconstruction of the pelvic floor after ESP largely determines the immediate and long-term results of the disease, reflecting the life quality of patients.

References

[1]  Maistrenko N.A., Khvatov A.A. et al. Exenteration of small pelvis in the treatment of locally advanced tumors // Herald of Surgery. 2014. No2. P. 47-52.
[2]  Davydov M.I., Odaryuk TS, Nechushkin M.I. et al. Tactics of surgical treatment for locally extended tumors of the pelvic organs with bladder lesion // Oncourology. 2006. No. 2. P. 26-30.
[3]  Lopez-Basave H.N., Morales-Vasquez F. et al. Pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: oncologic outcome in 59 patients at a single institution. //Cancer Manag.Res 2012; 4: 351-356.
[4]  Kosenko I.A., Matylevich O.P. Pelvic exenteration in patients with cervical cancer: literature review // Oncological Journal. - No. 4 (8). - P. 82–89.
[5]  Eliseev D.E., Alekseev B.Ya., Ogay D.S. Empty pelvic syndrome after pelvic exenteration // Oncogynecology 2016. No. 4. P. 69-70.
[6]  Driver E.J., Rauh-Hain J.A. et al. Total pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies. // Int. J Surg. Oncol. 2012; Art ID 693535: 1-9.
[7]  Ilyin K.A., Zamyatin A.V. The role of pelvic evisceration in the treatment of postradiation recurrence of cervical cancer at the present stage (literature review) // Oncogynecology. - 2013. - No. 1. - P. 43–53.
[8]  Ferenschild F. T., Vermaas M., Verhoef C. et al. Total pelvic exenterations for primary and recurrent malignancies // World J. Surg. 2009. Vol. 33. P. 1502-1508.
[9]  Latypov VR, Dambaev G.Ts. et al. Results of pelvic exentration in women performed for tumor lesions and complications of radiation therapy // Oncourology. 2015. No1. P. 56-60.
[10]  Brunschwig, A. What are the indications and results of pelvic exenteration? // J.A. M.A. 1965. Vol. 194. P. 274-281.
[11]  Pavlov V.N., Bakirov A.A., Kabirov I.V., Izmaylov A.A., Kutliyarov L.M., Safiullin R.L., Urmantsev M.F., Sultanov I.M., Abdrakhimov R.V. Reconstruction of the pelvic floor after pelvic evisceration using a musculocutaneous flap m. gracilis. // Urology. 2015. May-Jun; (3): 39-42.
[12]  Shirokorad V.I. Surgical treatment of locally extended pelvic tumors. - M .: Medicine; Chicot, 2008.
[13]  Chiva LM, Lapuente F, Núñez C, Ramírez PT. Ilealorthotopicneobladder after pelvic exenteration for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr; 113(1): 47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.020. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
[14]  Choy I, Young JM, Badgery-Parker T, Masya LM, Shepherd HL, Koh C, Heriot AG, Solomon MJ. Baseline quality of life predicts pelvic exenteration outcome. ANZ J Surg. 2015 Dec 21. doi: 10.1111/ans.13419.
[15]  Berdov B.A., Nevolsky A.A., Erygin D.V. Total mesorectumectomy in the treatment of patients with resectable rectal cancer // Coloproctology. 2008. No3 (25). P.4-10.