F. G. Nazirov, R. A. Ibadov, A. Kh. Babadjanov, B. R. Abdullajanov
Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Surgery named after Academician V. Vakhidov, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract
The aim of the study is to improve the treatment outcomes of patients with acute pancreatitis by improving tactical diagnostic monitoring of specific pancreatogenic complications and optimizing the complex of therapeutic and preventive measures. Materials. The authors conduct a structural analysis of the main systemic pancreatogenic complications and causes of mortality at acute biliary pancreatitis in 438 patients from the total patients quantity and surgical treatment was performed in 25.6% (112 of 438) cases. Methods. The analysis of indicators was carried out by Ranson and APACHE II prognostic scales. Conclusion. The progression of biliary pancreatitis is characterized by the possibility of multicomponent development of various pancreatitis-associated systemic complications, against the background of which the mortality rate made up 11.4%. The main causal factors of an unfavorable prognosis in the structure of mortality were such manifestations of multiple organ failure as acute respiratory distress syndrome - 77.8% and renal failure - 48.1%, as well as septic manifestations - 33.3% and hemorrhagic complications - 11, one%.
Keywords:
Pancreatitis, Multiple organ failure, Structural analysis of complications
Cite this paper: F. G. Nazirov, R. A. Ibadov, A. Kh. Babadjanov, B. R. Abdullajanov, Analysis of Complications and Causes of Lethal Outcomes at Acute Pancreatitis of Biliary Etiology, American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Vol. 10 No. 1, 2020, pp. 13-16. doi: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20201001.04.
1. Introduction
In modern surgery of the hepatobiliary system, pancreatic diseases still remain an urgent socio-epidemiological and clinical issue of health care. For example, according to European gastroenterologists’ data, acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common cause of emergency hospitalization with a frequency of approximately 40 cases per 100,000 populations per year [1-6]. Two of the most common factors - biliary pancreatitis and an alcohol-alimentary form of the disease accounting for 70–80% of all cases are distinguished in the structure of etiological reasons. About 10-20% of acute pancreatitis are classified as severe, characterized by a high incidence of local purulent-necrotic and systemic pancreatogenic complications. In turn, mortality, despite the improvement of diagnostic methods, the use of modern methods of conservative and surgical treatment, remains high and varies in the range of 7.5-15.2% and at destructive forms reaches 40-70%. Hospital mortality in the first week after admission makes up 35-50%. There has been a slight decrease in mortality for recent years. Mortality rates remain high and reach up to 40-70%in the older age group, especially at destructive forms of severe acute pancreatitis [7-11].The development of AP severe forms is determined by two factors that reflect the severity of the disease: organ failure and pancreatonecrosis. About half of fatal outcomes cases in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) occur during the first two weeks and are mainly explained by multiple organ failure syndrome (MOFS), characterized by a systemic inflammatory response (SIR) and a high incidence of local purulent-necrotic and systemic pancreatogenic complications with variable degree of organs dysfunction [12-15]. Aim of study is to improve the treatment results of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) by updating tactical diagnostic monitoring of specific pancreatogenic complications and optimizing the complex of therapeutic and preventive measures.
2. Materials and Methods
A comparative analysis of 438 patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) of biliary etiology who were treated by the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Surgery named after academician V. Vakhidov and in the clinic of Andijan State Medical Institute for the period from 2009 to 2018 was carried out in this study. Surgical interventions were performed in 25.6% (112 from 438) cases. Patients were distributed according to the type of performed surgeries as follows: 5.9%, (26 of 438) - laparotomy, cholecystectomy (CCE), choledoch drainage, opening, sanation and stuffing box drainage; in 5.0% (22 from 438) cases - laparoscopy, drainage of the common bile duct according to Pikovsky, drainage of the omental bursa were performed; 4.8% (21 from 438) – laparotomy, necrosecestrectomy, drainage of the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space; 4.6% (20 from 438) - CCE, choledocholithotomy, drainage of the common bile duct, opening, rehabilitation and drainage of the stuffing box; 2.7% (12 from 438) patients had drainage of the stuffing box under ultrasound control; in 0.7% of cases - laparoscopy, laparotomy, drainage of the omental bursa and abdominal cavity. The choice of treatment tactics at biliary AP in favor of conservative intensive therapy was associated with an overall mortality rate of 2.4% (4 from 164 cases), while the use of surgical tactics in the early stages of the disease led to deaths in 31.5% (23 of 73) of cases (Tab. 1).Table 1. Lethality rate depending on the severity of biliary pancreatitis course  |
| |
|
An analysis of the mortality rate depending on the severity of biliary AP course, evaluated according to prognostic scales showed that with scores of more than 6 according to Ranson and more than 15 according to APACHE II, a high mortality rate is observed both at a conservative (33.3%; 2 from 6) and at surgical treatment (76.5%; 13 from 17). An analysis of lethal outcomes causes showed that in 85.2% (23 of 27) of cases more than two fatal complications were observed. The most common complications of surgical treatment were acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (19.2%; 14 from 73), acute renal failure (15.1%; 11 from73), and acute cardiovascular failure (ACVF) (12.33%; 9 from 73) and sepsis (11.0%). Conservative treatment tactics was characterized by a significantly lower complications rate: ARDS and renal failure were detected in 1.2% (2 of 164) of cases, ACVF and sepsis – in 0.6% (1 observation) (Tab. 2).Table 2. The frequency and structure of mortality causes at acute biliary pancreatitis  |
| |
|
The distribution of lethality depending on the frequency of fatal complications of biliary AP is presented in Table. 3. From the total number of patients with biliary AP, a complicated course of the disease was observed in 59 cases from 237. Lethality made up 45.8% (27 of 59) with the highest rate at the development of septic shock (77.8%), at disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome (75.0%) and gastroduodenal bleeding (75.0%). At ARDS lethality was 61.8%.Table 3. The distribution of mortality level depending on the frequency of fatal complications of biliary pancreatitis  |
| |
|
In the structure of lethal outcomes (n = 27), a significant part of the complicated course was associated with the development of ARDS - 77.8% (21 from 27). Renal failure made up 48.1% (13 from 27 cases), cardiovascular failure - (37, 0%; 10 from 27) and sepsis (33.3%; 9 from 27). Progressing liver failure accounted 25.9% of complications.
3. Results
Thus, the progression of biliary pancreatitis is characterized by the possibility of multicomponent development of various pancreatitis-associated systemic complications, against the background of which the mortality rate was 11.4% (with conservative tactics - 2.4%, with surgical interventions - 31.5%). In the structure of systemic complications, the main causal factors of an unfavorable prognosis were such manifestations of multiple organ failure (MOF) as ARDS - 77.8% (in 21 of 27 patients who died) and renal failure - 48.1% (13), as well as septic manifestations - 33.3% (in 9 patients) and hemorrhagic complications - 11.1%.
4. Discussion
According to our data, the most common and significant systemic complication of severe AP is pancreatitis-associated ARDS, which is characterized by severe hypoxemia requiring the immediate use of respiratory support, and the progression of diffuse lesion of the lung tissue. In the framework of this research we studied the role of this fatal condition in the general structure of complications and causes of mortality at biliary AP.Early development was observed in 76.5% (26 from 34) cases from all cases of ARDS, in the structure of all APs early development of ARDS was observed in 11.0% (26 from 237), against the background of other complications - 3.4% (8 from 237) of cases (Fig. 1). In the structure of total mortality ARDS accounts for 6.3% (15 from 237) in the early stages of AP and 2.5% (6 from 237) in the late stages, already against the background of other complications. The mortality rate in the ARDS structure made up 44.1% (15 of 34) with early development and 17.6% (6 of 34) against the background of other complications. | Figure 1. Risk distribution of the development of ARDS as an early or late (against the background of other complications) factor of biliary pancreatitis complicated course |
Assessment of ARDS severity according to the Berlin definitions-2011 showed that almost half (41.2%) of the cases were ARDS of moderate severity, severe course was noted in 32.4% (11 from 34) cases, mild course made up 26.5% (9 from 34) observations. The main component of ARDS intensive care remains timely initiated and adequately conducted respiratory support. A study of the growth of the oxygenation index (PaO2 / FiO2) as the main indicator of respiratory therapy effectiveness showed that at pancreatitis-associated ARDS, the increase in PaO2 / FiO2 after 1 day to 50% was detected in 29.4% (10) cases, from 51 to 100% - in 32.4% (11) and more than 100% - in 20.6% (7). At the same time, 17.6% (6 from 34) of the observations were characterized by less than 10% increase of the PaO2 / FiO2 index, which in turn was an unfavorable prognostic sign of ARDS.
5. Conclusions
The problem of improving the tactical aspects of this severe pathology treatment affects not only surgical approaches, but also the issues of improving the quality of multicomponent conservative therapy. Despite certain disagreements on tactical issues, most experts agree on the need of developing diagnostic and treatment protocols for each form of acute pancreatitis, taking into account the experience and capabilities of each particular clinic. Differences in the frequency of systemic complications and mortality in conservative and surgical tactics can be caused, on the one hand, by the severity of the pathological process, when, within the edematous or destructive form of pancreatitis, a significant dispersion of indicators on prognostic scales is possible and, accordingly, a more serious condition in the group of surgical activity. However, on the other hand, it may also be the result of choosing an inadequate treatment of pancreatogenic complications.
References
| [1] | Karimov Sh.I., Khakimov M.Sh., Matkuliev U.I. New views on the surgical problems of acute pancreatitis. Materials of the 14th republican scientific-practical conference "Actual problems of the organization of emergency medical care: issues of urgent surgery for diseases and injuries of the hepatopancreatoduodenal zone." Tashkent, December 12, 2017 Bulletin of emergency medicine. 2017; 10 (4): 17. |
| [2] | Nazirov F.G., Ibadov R.A., Ibragimov S.Kh. The standardization of intensive care in severe destructive pancreatitis. Materials of the 14th republican scientific-practical conference "Actual problems of the organization of emergency medical care: issues of urgent surgery for diseases and injuries of the hepatopancreatoduodenal zone." Tashkent, December 12, 2017 Bulletin of emergency medicine. 2017; 10 (4): 23. |
| [3] | da Costa DW, Boerma D, van Santvoort HC. Staged multidisciplinary step-up management for necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 2014; 101: P 65–79. |
| [4] | Garber A, Frakes C, Arora Z, Chahal P. Mechanisms and Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 Mar 15;2018:6218798. |
| [5] | Maheshwari R, Subramanian RM. Severe Acute Pancreatitisand Necrotizing Pancreatitis. Crit Care Clin. 2016 Apr; 32(2):279-90. |
| [6] | Vivian E,Cler L, Conwell D.et al. Acute Pancreatitis Task Force on Quality: Development of Quality Indicators for Acute Pancreatitis Management. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019; 114(8): 1322-1342. |
| [7] | Halperin E.I., Dyuzheva TG, Dokuchaev K.V. Diagnosis and surgical treatment of pancreatic necrosis. Surgery 2013; 3: 50-54. |
| [8] | Rizaev K.S., Altiev B.K., Alidzhanov F.B. et al. Ways to improve the surgical treatment of patients with infected pancreatic necrosis. Bulletin of emergency medicine. 2016; 9 (1): 22-27. |
| [9] | Escobar-Arellano R, Guraieb-Barragán E, Mansanares-Hernández A. etal. Sensitivity, specificity and reliability of the POP score vs. APACHE II score as predictors of severe acute biliary pancreatitis. Cir Cir. 2019; 87(4): 402-409. |
| [10] | Harshit Kumar A, Singh Griwan M. A comparison of APACHE II, BISAP, Ranson's score and modified CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on the 2012 revised Atlanta Classification. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018 May; 6(2): 127-131. |
| [11] | Jinno N, Hori Y, Naitoh I. et al. Predictive factors for the mortality of acute pancreatitis on admission. PLoSOne. 2019 Aug 22; 14(8): e0221468. |
| [12] | Nesterenko Yu. A., Laptev V.V., Mikhaylusov S.V. Diagnosis and treatment of destructive pancreatitis // M. - 2007. - p. 283 - 295. |
| [13] | Rizaev K.S. Optimization of the diagnosis and treatment of acute destructive pancreatitis: abstract dis. ... doctor. of med. sciences. Tashkent 2017, p. 43. |
| [14] | Kayar Y, Senturk H, Tozlu M. Prediction of Self-Limited Acute Pancreatitis Cases at Admission to Emergency Unit. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2019; 26(4):251-259. |
| [15] | Manrai M, Kochhar R, Gupta V et al. Outcome of acute pancreatic and peripancreatic collections occurring in patients with acute pancreatitis. Ann. Surg. 2018; 267: 357-63. |