American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

p-ISSN: 2165-901X    e-ISSN: 2165-9036

2019;  9(7): 259-261

doi:10.5923/j.ajmms.20190907.07

 

The Impact of the Term of Preliminary Traction and the Age on the Development of Aseptic Necrosis of Caput Femori after Conservative Therapy of Hip Dislocation

A. M. Jurayev1, I. M. Kadirov2

1Republican Specialized Scientific Practical Center of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Tashkent City, Uzbekistan

2Republican Center of Children’s Orthopaedics, Kibray District, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Background. The problem of the therapy of congenital hip dislocation (CHD) in children was always linked with sequlae appearing during and after the therapy. The objective. In this regard the objective of our study was to answer the question if duration of the functional traction effects the frequency of caput femori (CF) aseptic necrosis development and whether the age of CHD initial therapy had an impact on the further prognosis of hip joint (HJ) development as a whole. Materials and methods. We examined 276 patients (319 HJ), who had plaster traction before reduction of CHD. Patients were divided to groups according to age at the time of CHD primary therapy. Results. Out of 319 HJ fifty nine cases had development of CFAN (18%). The lowest parameter was detected in the group of patients from 3 to 6 months in 8%, while the highest one was determined in the age 24036 months, where it was equal to 53%. In cases of preliminary traction more than 3 weeks development of CFAN was equal to 6%. Conclusion. Duration of preliminary traction in conservative therapy of CHD is very important. Prognosis of complete development of HJ was significantly worse in children above 1 compared to those from 3 to 12 months.

Keywords: Hip joint, Congenital hip dislocation, Extraction, Caput femori aseptic necrosis

Cite this paper: A. M. Jurayev, I. M. Kadirov, The Impact of the Term of Preliminary Traction and the Age on the Development of Aseptic Necrosis of Caput Femori after Conservative Therapy of Hip Dislocation, American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Vol. 9 No. 7, 2019, pp. 259-261. doi: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20190907.07.

1. Introduction

The term hip joint dysplasia (HJD) involves several anatomical alterations when there is disorder of caput femori (CF) and acetabulum (A) correlation, irregular development of HJ leading to the development of its instability. In developed countries frequency of HJD is 4-6 cases per 1000 alive-born neonates [1,2]. HJD is usually diagnosed within initial months of baby’s life with the help of screening orthopedic examinations and selective x-ray check-ups [3]. In cases when a positive Barlow (dislocation - sub-dislocation) or\and Ortolani symptoms, dislocation of CF and impossibility of its reduction or instability were detected in HJ by means of US, these patients were registered or started to be treated. The aim of the therapy was restoration of HJ congruency and to reach maximal functionally good result in spite of associated anatomical obstacles including muscle weakness, arthrosis or chronic pain.
It is commonly accepted that for children with HJED at the age under 6 months abduction splints and other structures are used [4]. For children above 6 months old a closed reduction of CF is used in A with application of plaster bandages [4]. Some specialists apply preliminary traction prior to closed reduction. Study of case histories of patients shows that application of preliminary traction decreases the frequency of CF aseptic necrosis development (CFAN), developing after close reduction, and it diminishes the need of open reduction of CF [5,8]. However, the data of some authors do not confirm these results [9-12].

2. The Objective

We performed our study to get answers to two questions. Does duration of functional traction effect the frequency of caput femori aseptic necrosis development and does the age when initial CHD therapy was performed have an impact on the further prognosis of hip joint development as a whole?

3. Materials and Research Methods

In the Republican Center of Children’s Orthopedics of the MH of the RUz within 2010-2011 we observed more than 2500 patients with congenital hip dislocation and sub-dislocation. 276 of these patients with 319 congenital HJ dislocation were selected as we had complete information about these patients. Prior to reduction all patients had functional plaster traction, which gave us a chance to assess the efficacy of the procedure. As more than 2/3 of our patients were revealed and treated under 1 year old, we could also analyze the results of the therapy in that age group.
The study involved patients with CHD without any associate pathology and complications of the basic disease. All patients who had primary treatment start at 36 months of life, patients who underwent surgery in 2 years after primary conservative therapy, and patients with HJ sub-dislocation or dysplasia were excluded from the study. Besides that, all HJ were followed up at least for 1 year after the primary therapy.
Among 276 selected patients there were 238 girls and 38 boys. One hundred and twenty eight patients had left side CHD, 105 had right-side dysplasia, while bilateral one was observed in 43 of the patients, totally 319 HJ. In our research with the help of x-ray and MRI we determined the following alterations in the development of CFAN: fragmentation, rise of density, flattening and heterogeneity of CF ossific nucleus, shortening and widening of neck of femur, protuberance of medial metaphysic, and disorder of CF ossific nucleus appearance and growth.
Though most of researchers state that in case of CHD the CF ossification center is visualized later and stays small for a longer term or does not appear at all, we observed four relevant unusual cases. In these cases there was earlier appearance of ossification center or greater size of ossification center of the damaged side compared to healthy side of the opposite HJ.
In the age under 3 months primary therapy was performed in 98 cases of CHD; in 71 cases it was done within the period from 3 to 6 months and in 50 CHD cases in the age from 6 to 12 months. Thus, 68% of the patients received primary therapy before they were 1 year old.
All patients had adhesive plaster traction in flexion and abduction position in hip jopint not more than 90°. The strength of traction was changed dependently on the age, size of baby and condition of a child’s skin, while in rare cases the load was over 1.5 kg (varied from 0.9 to 2 kg). traction was considered to be successful when CF ossification center dipped to Y-shape cartilage. In the patients without ossification center that parameter was evaluated according to the restoration of Shenton’s line. After that a close reduction was performed with anesthesia; plaster was applied in Lorenz I position. The plaster was removed three months later, and after that a patient wore Vilenski’s splint.

4. Results

We performed comparison of CFAN development in the age aspect (Chart 1).
Chart 1. Prevalence of CFAN dependently on the age of patients when primary treatment was started
     
CFAN developed in fourteen cases (14%) with CHD out of 98 who received therapy under 3 months age, 6 cases (8%) out of 71 primarily treated in the age from 3 to 6 months, and 3 cases (6%) among the patients who were treated initially in the age from 6 to 12 months. Among the patients aged from 12 to 18 months CFAN developed in 10 (22%) out of 45 HJ; in the age from 18 to 24 months it was noted in 16 (44%) out of 36 HJ; in the age from 24 to 36 months that figure was equal to 53%. CFAN developed in 59 (18%) cases of 319 HJ. It should be noted that the greatest prevalence of CFAN was observed among the children above 1 year old.
When we compared the duration of preliminary traction and CFAN development independently of age it became clear that prolonged period of traction decreased CFAN development rate. We tried to analyze that fact in relation to age parameters and the result was that in the age group from 0 to 3 months (98 HJ), if traction was applied less than 3 weeks CFAN prevalence was 18% (12/66), while application of traction for more than 3 weeks decreased that value to 6% (2/32). We could observe that tendency in the age group above 1 (100 HJ) in 47% (34/72) and 7% (2/28), respectively (Chart 2).
Chart 2. CFAN prevalence dependently on the term of preliminary traction
     

5. Discussion

Trueta et al. [11] described the complete CF circulation in neonates and the period of early childhood. Damage f vascular lumen of developing CF can lead to the dysfunction of ossification center, dilution of growth area, disorder of stop of longitudinal growth of femoral bone. Strobino et al., Salter and Field, Trias and Trueta [11] studied the impact of pressure on joint and growth cartilages in detail. In relation to that traction is applied for an adaptation of contracted soft tissues surrounding HJ.
A question about early open reduction of CHD in children under 2 arises due to the presence of these results of conservative therapy. Though it should be noted that local and foreign references are overfilled by reports of positive results of conservative therapy. Our study revealed noticeably bad results of conservative therapy of CHD with application of traction among children above 1. Prevalence of CFAN among children under 3 causes anxiety. During that period ossification center is not determined on x-ray images. That is why aseptic alterations are not revealed in time even in very severe cases. Out study confirmed our suggestion that cartilage part of CF is partially tend to aseptic alterations.

6. Conclusions

Following conclusions were made in the result of detailed study of the results of the therapy in 319 cases of CHD:
1. The term of preliminary traction in conservative therapy of CHD is very important. The lowest prevalence of CFAN was determined in the cases of traction term from 21 to 28 days before close reduction.
2. Prognosis of complete development of HJ was much worse in children above 1 compared to the patients from 3 to 12 months old.
3. CFAN prevalence among the children under 3 months was higher (14%) than that among 3-12 months old children.
4. Metaphysis alterations noted in WTB of neonates prior to X-ray detection of ossification center serve to be pathognomic in CFAN diagnostics.

References

[1]  Pollet V, Percy V, Prior HJ. Relative risk and incidence for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr 2017; 181: 202–7.
[2]  Woodacre T, Ball T, Cox P. Epidemiology of developmental dysplasia of the hip within the UK: refining the risk factors. J Child Orthop 2016; 10: 633–42.
[3]  Anon. Clinical practice guideline: early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Committee on quality improvement, subcommittee on developmental dysplasia of the hip. American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 896–905.
[4]  Al-Essa RS, Aljahdali FH, Alkhilaiwi RM, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a current practice of paediatric orthopaedic surgeons. J Orthop Surg 2017; 25: 230949901771719.
[5]  Yamada N, Maeda S, Fujii G, et al. Closed reduction of developmental dislocation of the hip by prolonged traction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85: 1173–7.
[6]  DeRosa GP, Feller N. Treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. Management before walking age. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987: 77–85.
[7]  Daoud A, Saighi-Bououina A. Congenital dislocation of the hip in the older child. The effectiveness of overhead traction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 30–40.
[8]  Langenskiöld A, Paavilainen T. The effect of prereduction traction on the results of closed reduction of developmental dislocation of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 2000; 20: 471–4.
[9]  Pospischill R, Weninger J, Ganger R, et al. Does open reduction of the developmental dislocated hip increase the risk of osteonecrosis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 250–60.
[10]  Kutlu A, Ayata C, Ogün TC, et al. Preliminary traction as a single determinant of avascular necrosis in developmental dislocation of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 2000; 20: 579–84.
[11]  Kahle WK, Anderson MB, Alpert J, et al. The value of preliminary traction in the treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 1043–7.
[12]  Sucato DJ, De La Rocha A, Lau K, et al. Overhead bryant’s traction does not improve the success of closed reduction or limit AVN in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 2017; 37: e108–13.