American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

p-ISSN: 2165-901X    e-ISSN: 2165-9036

2017;  7(0): 350-355

doi:10.5923/j.ajmms.20170710.02

 

Time for Recovery of Symptoms after Septoplasty

Abdullah Alotaibi1, Bassam Ahmed Almutlaq2, Hussain Gadelkarim Ahmed2

1Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Hail of University, Saudi Arabia

2College of Medicine, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence to: Hussain Gadelkarim Ahmed, College of Medicine, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.

Email:

Copyright © 2017 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Background: Nasal obstruction is one of the mutual clinical presentations that otorhinolaryngologists faces in every day practice. Deviated nasal septum (DNS) is one of the most frequent reason for the nasal obstruction. Therefore, the aim of the present study was assess the suitable timing for recovery of nasal obstruction associated complications after Septoplasty. Methodology: This study included a series of 104 patients presented with nasal obstruction and subsequently undergone septoplasty. Several nasal obstruction clinical complains were evaluated after 3 months and one year of septoplasty. Results: Statistically significant improvement with increase of time has been achieved in nasal blockage, breathing distress, sleeping distress, nasal congestion, exercise, and other complications. Conclusion: A significant improvement of nasal obstruction associated complications start after 3 months of Septoplasty but ultimate benefit may occur after one year.

Keywords: Septoplasty, Nasal blockage, Nasal obstruction, Breathing distress, Nasal congestion, Sleeping distress

Cite this paper: Abdullah Alotaibi, Bassam Ahmed Almutlaq, Hussain Gadelkarim Ahmed, Time for Recovery of Symptoms after Septoplasty, American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Vol. 7 No. 0, 2017, pp. 350-355. doi: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20170710.02.

1. Introduction

Obstructed nasal breathing can occur due to deviation of the nasal septum [1]. Nasal obstruction is one of the most common problems in otolaryngology practice. Nasal obstruction can be caused by several factors such as deviation of nasal septum, nasal valve collapse, turbinate hypertrophy and nasal polyposis [2]. Among them, septum deviation is the main etiologic factor and more than half of the population have this problem [3, 4].
Septoplasty is one of the most frequently performed otorhinolaryngological procedures which might be very challenging for the surgeon [5]. Successful septoplasty involves accurate assessment of septal pathology and sound technique to avoid persistent symptoms and new complications [6]. An accurate preoperative diagnosis of pathologies of the septum in the context of the nasal cavity is essential for the success of surgery. Intraoperative visualization through microscope or endoscope is very helpful for the surgeon and for the training of the residents. The modern technique of septoplasty with the phases of approach, mobilization, resection/repositioning and reconstruction/fixation is presented. Furthermore, the extracorporeal septoplasty in extreme deviations of the septum and alternative techniques for use in cases with limited pathologies as well as aspects of septoplasty in children are discussed. As particularly pathologies of the caudal septum are responsible for failures of septal surgery, some special problems of this region such as the vertical fracture of the caudal septum, the lack of caudal septum or anterior convexities of the cartilaginous septum are argued [5].
Most studies show that objective measures to quantify and determine surgical success in the treatment of nasal obstruction do not correlate with subjective improvement as reported by patients [7]. Since there are many septoplasty procedures, each with its limitations, a variety of postoperative complications, which might be associated with preoperative complaints or associated with the surgical modification can occur. Therefore, the aim of the present study was assess the suitable timing for recovery of nasal obstruction associated complications after Septoplasty.

2. Materials and Methods

This study included a series of 104 patients presented with nasal obstruction and subsequently undergone septoplasty. Archives related to all patients selected for septoplasty between 2012 and 2017 were retrieved from ear, nose, throat (ENT) department, King Khalid hospital in Hail, Northern Saudi Arabia. Patients’ medical records were investigated, and patients with a history of rhinoplasty, cranial and facial trauma or bone deformity (except DNS), and patients with a mass in the nasal cavity were excluded from the study. Only patients with apparent nasal obstruction related clinical presentation (complains) were considered. Several nasal obstruction clinical presentations were recorded included: nasal congestion, nasal blockage, breathing distress, sleeping distress, and exercise unease. Demographical characteristics including; age, gender and residence were also recorded.
The different initial clinical presentations and complications were compared after three one year of septoplasty.
Ethical consent
Our study protocol was conformed according to the 2013 Declaration of Helsinki and this study was approved by ethics committee of College of Medicine, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software for Windows (version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables are given as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables. For all statistical comparisons, a p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

The present study examined records of 104 patients presented with different clinical complains related to nasal obstruction. Out of the 104 patients, 82/104(78.8%) were males and 22/104(21.2%) were females, giving males' females' ration of 3.73: 1.00. The ages of the patients ranging from 17 to 42 years with a mean age of 27 years old. The majority of the patients were at age group 21-25 years followed by 26-30, and <20 years, representing 34/104(32.7%), 25/104(21.9%) and 16/104(15.4%), respectively. For males most of them were at age range 26-30 years followed by 21-25 and 30-35 years constituting 25/82(30.5%), 23/82(28%) and 13/82(15.9%) correspondingly. For females most of them were at age range 21-25 years followed by <20 and 36+ years constituting 11/22(50%), 6/22(27.3%) and 3/22(13.6%) correspondingly, as indicated in Table 1, Fig 1.
Table 1. Description of the study subjects by demographical characteristics
     
Figure 1. Description of the study subjects by demographical characteristics
With regard to occupation, most of the study subjects were students followed by others and employees representing, 31/104(29.8%), 25/104(24%) and 24/104(23%), respectively. For males most of them were employees, followed by students and teachers constituting 23/82(28%), 21/82(25.6%) and 13/82(15.9%), in this order. For females most of them were students, followed by others and teachers constituting 10/22(45.5%), 8/22(36.4%) and 2/22(9%), in this order, as indicated in Table 1, Fig 1.
The majority of patients attended with nasal blockage followed by, sleeping distress, breathing distress, nasal congestion, exercise unease, and other complains, representing 100/104(96%), 95/104(91.3%), 94/104(90.4%), 88/104(84.6%), 81/104(77.9%) and 4/104(3.8%), respectively.
Table 2 summarizes the distribution of the patients by nasal obstruction related clinical complaints before septoplasty, after 3 months and after one year of septoplasty. For nasal blockade, symptoms completely disappeared from 39/100(39%) and 69/100(69%) of the patients after 3 months and one year respectively. Severe and moderate symptoms present only in 5 and 13 patients respectively, after 3 months, hence, severe and moderate present only in 2 and 6 of the cases respectively after one years, as indicated in Table 2, Fig 2. These findings indicated that septoplasty is important for the management of nasal distress, as well as the maximum timing for recovery of complaints can be achieved after one year of Septoplasty, and this was found to be statistically significant P <0.0001.
Table 2. Distribution of the study subjects by nasal obstruction related clinical complains before septoplasty, after 3 months and after one year of septoplasty
     
Figure 2. Description of patients by clinical symptoms at initial presentation, after 3 months and after one year of septoplasty
For sleeping distress, symptoms completely disappeared from 59/95(62%) and 76/95(80%) of the patients after 3 months and one year respectively. Severe and moderate symptoms present only in 5 and 22 patients respectively, after 3 months, hence, severe and moderate present only in 3 and 5 of the cases respectively after one years, as indicated in Table 2, Fig 2. These findings indicated that septoplasty is important for the management of sleeping distress, as well as the maximum timing for recovery of complaints can be achieved after one year of Septoplasty, and this was found to be statistically significant P <0.0001.
For breathing distress, symptoms completely disappeared from 48/94(51%) and 67/94(71%) of the patients after 3 months and one year respectively. Severe and moderate symptoms present only in 4 and 13 patients respectively, after 3 months, hence, severe and moderate present only in 0 and 5 of the cases respectively after one years, as indicated in Table 2, Fig 2. These findings indicated that septoplasty is important for the management of breathing distress, as well as the maximum timing for recovery of complaints can be achieved after one year of Septoplasty, and this was found to be statistically significant P <0.0001.
For nasal congestion, symptoms completely disappeared from 23/88(26%) and 54/88(61%) of the patients after 3 months and one year respectively. Severe and moderate symptoms present only in 5 and 13 patients respectively, after 3 months, hence, severe and moderate present only in 1 and 7 of the cases respectively after one years, as indicated in Table 2, Fig 2. These findings indicated that septoplasty is important for the management of nasal congestion, as well as the maximum timing for recovery of complaints can be achieved after one year of Septoplasty, and this was found to be statistically significant P <0.0001.
For exercise unease, symptoms completely disappeared from 59/81(73%) and 70/81(86%) of the patients after 3 months and one year respectively. Severe and moderate symptoms present only in 0 and 4 patients respectively, after 3 months, hence, no severe or moderate was found after one years, as indicated in Table 2, Fig 2. These findings indicated that septoplasty is important for the management of exercise unease, as well as the maximum timing for recovery of complaints can be achieved after one year of Septoplasty, and this was found to be statistically significant P <0.0001.
Table 3 summarized the distribution of the patients by clinical presentations before septoplasty, after 3 months and after one year of septoplasty by gender. All initial clinical complications (including: nasal blockage, sleeping distress, breathing distress, nasal congestion and exercise unease) were significantly modified after one year of septoplasty (P <0.0001), both for males and females. However, within each gender group there was variations within the degree of symptoms. While, other complications such as bleeding and loss of smell were completely disappeared, about 40/104(38.5%) of the patients witnessed a change in the shape of their noses, particularly after one year of septoplasty.
Table 3. Distribution of patients by clinical presentations and gender at initial presentation, after 3 months and after one year of septoplasty
     

4. Discussion

Nasal airway obstruction can be a source of discomfort and can have a significant impact on daily life. Nasal obstruction may lead to difficulty in breathing, eating, speaking, sleeping and overall physical activity of an individual. Septoplasty is a treatment of choice to relief these complains particularly when the obstruction is associated with DNS. In most instances the timing for recovery from these symptoms is chiefly depends on Septoplasty method involved.
Outcome analysis is one vital mean for the evaluation of quality of medical carefulness. It assesses to what level the aims of medical care have been succeeded. Miscellaneous approaches are in use to execute this task. In the present study assess the suitable timing for recovery of nasal obstruction associated complications after Septoplasty. Three sets of nasal obstruction related complications associated data were compared to find out the suitable timing to a chief ultimate recovery of initial symptoms after Septoplasty.
After three months of septoplasty we found statistically significant improvement of all assessed initial clinical complications (P <0.001). Many factors have been involved in the determination of the outcomes of Septoplasty. Procedures used for the diagnosis and treatment of DNS vary according to indications for the procedure and surgeon option, which in turn determine the fast or delayed recovery of obstruction symptoms [8]. Studies have shown that nasal obstruction clinical presentations start to recover after 15 days of septoplasty [9, 10].
However, great improvements have been achieved after one year of septoplasty in all obstruction related symptoms, but with high number nasal deformities. Some patients suffer from persistent obstruction after their primary septoplasty and may undergo a revision septoplasty to improve their nasal passageway It was found that a significant number of patients who undergo revision septoplasty also have nasal valve collapse. Thus it was recommended that in addition to septal deviation and inferior turbinate hypertrophy, nasal valve function be fully evaluated before performing septoplasty. This will help to ensure a complete understanding of a patient's nasal airway obstruction and, consequently, appropriate and effective surgical intervention [11].
However, the effectiveness of septoplasty for nasal obstruction in adults with a deviated nasal septum remains uncertain [12]. Scientific evidence is scarce and inconclusive, and internationally accepted guidelines are rare. There is a discrepancy between the occasionally heard opinion that septoplasty is an easy operation and its relatively high failure and complication rates [13].
This clinical agreement declaration was developed by and for otolaryngologists and is anticipated to inspire evidence-based care for patients undergoing septoplasty with or without inferior turbinate reduction. A complete definition of septoplasty with or without inferior turbinate reduction was first developed, and extra statements were consequently produced and assessed addressing diagnosis, medical managing prior to septoplasty, and surgical considerations, as well as the proper role of perioperative, postoperative, and adjuvant measures, in addition to outcomes. Moreover, a series of clinical statements were developed, such as "Computed tomography scan may not precisely demonstrate the degree of septal deviation," "Septoplasty can assist delivery of intranasal medications to the nasal cavity," "Endoscopy can be applied to enhance visualization of posterior-based septal deviation during septoplasty," and "Quilting sutures can obviate the need for nasal packing after septoplasty." It is expected that the application of these guidelines will result in reduced discrepancies in the care of septoplasty patients and an upsurge in the quality of care [14].
Although most of the initial clinical complications were subsided or diminished to mild symptoms, but patients satisfactory represent the major challenge. Although septoplasty offers sufficient correction of septal deviation, patients are not always satisfied with the procedure [15]. The level of satisfaction after Septoplasty may be influenced by individual differences in the perception of one's nasal passage changes and emotional factors. Thus of the limitations in the present study, the studied variables were less measureable.

5. Conclusions

Maximum recovery of symptoms associated nasal blockage can be achieved after one years of Septoplasty, through significant improvement can be acquired after three months. Individual perceptual variances of air passage modifications and emotional factors do not guess biased symptom enhancement after septoplasty. However, initial clinical presentations were the only prognostic factor for patient contentment after septoplasty.

References

[1]  Aaronson NL, Vining EM. Correction of the deviated septum: from ancient Egypt to the endoscopic era. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Nov; 4(11): 931-6. doi: 10.1002/alr.21371.
[2]  Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Witsell DL, Yueh B, Hannley MT, et al. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130: 283–90.
[3]  Fettman N, Sanford T, Sindwani R. Surgical management of the deviated septum: techniques in septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009; 42: 241–252.
[4]  Perez P, Sabate J, Carmona A, Catalina-Herrera CJ, Jimenez-Castellanos J. Anatomical variations in the human paranasal sinus region studied by CT. J Anat. 2000; 197: 221–227.
[5]  Baumann I. Septoplasty update. Laryngorhinootologie. 2010 Jun; 89(6): 373-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1252057.
[6]  Getz AE, Hwang PH. Endoscopic septoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Feb; 16(1): 26-31. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282f2c982.
[7]  Velasco LC, Arima LM, Tiago RS. Assessment of symptom improvement following nasal septoplasty with or without turbinectomy. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Sep-Oct; 77(5): 577-83.
[8]  Dobratz EJ, Park SS. Septoplasty pearls. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009 Jun; 42(3): 527-37. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2009.03.003.
[9]  Klinger F, Caviggioli F, Lisa AV, et al. Therapeutic effect of hyaluronic acid in reducing nasal mucosa recovery time after septoplasty. Ear Nose Throat J. 2017 Apr-May; 96(4-5): E16-E20.
[10]  Berkiten G, Kumral TL, Saltürk Z, et al. Effect of Deviated Nasal Septum Type on Nasal Mucociliary Clearance, Olfactory Function, Quality of Life, and Efficiency of Nasal Surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Jul; 27(5): 1151-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002696.
[11]  Becker SS, Dobratz EJ, Stowell N, Barker D, Park SS. Revision septoplasty: review of sources of persistent nasal obstruction. Am J Rhinol. 2008 Jul-Aug; 22(4): 440-4. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3200.
[12]  Van Egmond MMHT, Rovers MM, Hendriks CTM, van Heerbeek N. Effectiveness of septoplasty versus non-surgical management for nasal obstruction due to a deviated nasal septum in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015; 16: 500. doi:10.1186/s13063-015-1031-4.
[13]  Schultz-Coulon HJ. Comments on septoplasty. HNO. 2006 Jan; 54(1): 59-69; quiz 70.
[14]  Han JK, Stringer SP, Rosenfeld RM, et al. Clinical Consensus Statement: Septoplasty with or without Inferior Turbinate Reduction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Nov; 153(5): 708-20. doi: 10.1177/0194599815606435.
[15]  Hong SD, Lee NJ, Cho HJ, et al. Predictive factors of subjective outcomes after septoplasty with and without turbinoplasty: can individual perceptual differences of the air passage be a main factor? Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 Jul; 5(7): 616-21. doi: 10.1002/alr.21508.