American Journal of Environmental Engineering
p-ISSN: 2166-4633 e-ISSN: 2166-465X
2016; 6(5): 129-139
doi:10.5923/j.ajee.20160605.01

Pooja Sharma, Uttam Kumar Ghosh, Amiya Kumar Ray
Department of Polymer and Process Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Saharanpur Campus, Saharanpur, (UP), India
Correspondence to: Pooja Sharma, Department of Polymer and Process Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Saharanpur Campus, Saharanpur, (UP), India.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2016 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Simulation studies using dynamic model equations based on Haldane kinetics were performed to predict the optimized process parameters for anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Stability analysis of digester under high loading rate conditions was carried out considering wall growth factor (WGF). Initial and optimized process conditions for microbial concentration
and inhibition constant
were taken from batch studies. Simulation was performed by varying the values of
at four constant values of
. Poor process performance in terms of COD removal has been observed at lower values of
, even at higher values of inhibition constant
for continuous process. Maximum COD removal efficiency was observed by operating the digester at
and
. COD removal efficiency increased from 12% to 48% at higher loading rate of
and retention time of 15 day when WGF was included in the model equation. Under similar conditions COD removal efficiency decreased from 40% to 6.6% when the loading rate
was increased from 40g/L to 45 g/L, however, increase in retention time up to 20 day resulted in re-stabilized process conditions.
Keywords: Anaerobic digester, Sewage sludge, Wall growth factor, Haldane model
Cite this paper: Pooja Sharma, Uttam Kumar Ghosh, Amiya Kumar Ray, Dynamic Model for Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge Considering Haldane Kinetics and Wall Growth Factor, American Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 6 No. 5, 2016, pp. 129-139. doi: 10.5923/j.ajee.20160605.01.
|
and
, respectively,and the same for methanogens are given by
and
, respectively.![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
the continuous process model transforms to the model for batch process. The performance of digester has been predicted and compared under two situations with or without wall growth factor. The mass balance equation has been applied across digester to predict the degradation rate of raw substrate (sewage sludge) with respect to time.![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7.a) |
![]() | (7.b) |
is the wall growth factor.For the estimation of biodegradable fraction of methanogens following equations have been developed.Without wall growth factor:![]() | (8.a) |
![]() | (8.b) |
![]() | (9.a) |
![]() | (9.b) |
![]() | (10) |
= 10 g/L, particulate substrate concentration,
= 0.1 g/L and soluble substrate concentration,
= 5 g/L (Andrews et al., 1971; Bello-Mendoza et al., 1998; Azeiteiro et al., 2001), retention time 10 day under mesophilic (35°C) temperature condition and assuming the value of
= 0.20 g/L (Azeiteiro et al., 2001).
, 0.04 g/L, 0.1 g/L and 0.2 g/L by keeping
constant at four different values 0.1 g/L, 0.3 g/L, 0.5 g/L and 0.7 g/L. Lower
value indicates the higher inhibitory effect on methanogens due to the accumulation of volatile fatty acids, which act as a growth-limiting substrate for methanogens at lower concentration and as inhibiting agent at higher concentration. Fig. 1 represents the effect of volatile fatty acids in terms of
on the survival rate of methanogens. It can be observed from Fig. 1(a) and Fig. 1(b) that when the digester is operated at lower values of
(0.1 g/L and 0.3 g/L) survival rate of methanogens were inhibited even at higher values of
= 0.2 g/L (less inhibitory effect). The maximum survival rate of methanogens at higher value of
= 0.2 g/L was found to be 0.119 g/L and 0.407 g/L for initial concentration,
= 0.1 g/L (Fig. 1(a)) and 0.3 g/L (Fig. 1(b)), respectively. Lower
values of 0.1 g/L and 0.04 g/L resulted in process failure due to high inhibitory effect of volatile fatty acids on methanogens. As shown in Fig. 1(c) and Fig. 1(d), when the digester was operated at higher values of
= 0.5 g/L and 0.7 g/L the survival rate of methanogens was increased from 0.5 g/L to 0.6 g/L and 0.7 g/L to 1.04 g/L, respectively, at lower value of
= 0.1 g/L. Maximum survival rate was observed at higher values of
= 0.2 g/L (Fig. 1). From the batch studies it was observed that during initial phase the concentration of substrate is much higher resulted into higher production rate of volatile fatty acids (lower value of
) which effects the growth kinetics of methanogens. Operating digester at high concentration of volatile fatty acids causes poor process performance.Therefore, the digester should be operated at higher values of
and
to reduce the time required for start-up of the digester. This is in agreement with the observations of other researchers (Andrews et al., 1971; Azeiteiro et al., 2001).![]() | Figure 1. Simulation studies for batch anaerobic digester with varying inhibition constant |
, on digester performance under transient conditions by varying the value of
and
, respectively. The results of simulation of continuous processes have been shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. In Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, time (day) has been plotted against both methanogens concentration (g/L) and CODMethane (g COD/L). COD removal efficiency can be predicted by the formula given below. Fig. 2(a) and Fig. 2(b) describe the effect of
on the COD removal and survival rate of methanogens under constant value of inhibitory conditions (
=0.2 g/L). COD removal efficiency could be evaluated by using the following expression due to Bello-Mendoza et al. (1998):![]() | (11) |

The maximum COD removal efficiency of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge in the present investigation was found of the order of 55.2% at higher values of
= 0.2 g/L and
= 0.7 g/L as shown in Fig. 2(b). It was also observed from Fig. 2(a) and Fig. 2(b) that even under low inhibitory effect (high
value), lower values of
(0.1 g/L and 0.3 g/L) result in lower microbial survival rates indicating poor COD removal. Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 3(b) describe the effect different values of
on constant initial microbial concentration,
= 0.7 g/L. At lower
values of 0.04 g/L and 0.02 g/L higher inhibitory effect of volatile fatty acids on methanogens resulted in decrease in
value from 0.7 to 0.283 g/L and 0.266 g/L (Fig. 3(a), respectively. At higher
values less inhibition resulted in higher values of both COD removal efficiency and
(Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 3(b). Therefore, to improve the performance higher values of both
and
should be maintained when the digester is operated at transient conditions. ![]() | Figure 2. Simulation studies for effect on (a) methanogenic growth kinetic and (b) COD removal for continuous anaerobic digester with varying initial methanogens concentration ( Ki = 0.2 g/L) |
![]() | Figure 3. Simulation studies for effect on (a) methanogenic growth kinetic and (b) COD removal for continuous anaerobic digester with varying inhibition constant ( = 0.7 g/L) |
= 0.2 g/L and
= 0.7 g/L. Increase in
value from 10 g/L to 25 g/L (Fig. 4(a)) and from 10 g/L to 40 g/L (Fig. 4(b)) at same retention time of 15 day instabilize digester conditions and resulted in decreases in COD removal from 64% to 13.8% and 5.5%, respectively. Operating digester at higher loading rate at shorter retention time leads to the formation of volatile fatty acids at a rate higher than its rate of utilization which results in reduction of survival rate of methanogens. However, stability of digester at higher loading rates can be enhanced by simultaneously increase in retention time or diluting the reactor contents. Fig. 4(c) through Fig. 4(f) also represents the simulations carried out for gradual increase in loading rates. The retention time and substrate concentration
were varied from 15 day to 30 day and 20 g/L to 50 g/L, respectively. Increasing
value from 10 g/L to 20 g/L at retention time of 15 day resulted in decrease in COD removal from 64% to 48% (Fig. 4(c), whereas increase in
value from 20 g/L to 25 g/L at the same retention time of 15 day resulted in decreases of COD removal efficiency from 48% to 13.8%. Increase in
value from 30 g/L to 35 g/L at the same retention time of 20 day resulted in decrease in COD removal from 46.8% to 8.7% as shown in Fig. 4(d). Operating digester at higher loading rate at same retention time results in build up of volatile fatty acids and its inhibitory effects on methanogens. As shown in Fig. 4(e), when retention time was increased from 20 day to 25 day at constant loading rate of 35 g/L COD removal improved from 8.7% to 48.6%. This is due to dilution of reactor contents.Again increase in
value from 40 g/L to 50 g/L at the same retention time of 30 day resulted in decrease in COD removal efficiency from 49.8% to 6.6% due to build up of volatile fatty acids as shown in Fig. 4(f). ![]() | Figure 4. Simulation studies for continuous anaerobic digestion process for increase in loading rates (ki 0.2 g/L and 0.7 g/L) and effect of dilution on process performance |
![]() | Figure 5. COD removal efficiency of anaerobic digester with or without wall growth factor |
value increases from 10 g/L to 50 g/L at same retention time of 15 day (
= 0.15 g/L and
= 0.7 g/L). As shown in Fig. 5(a) at low value of
=10 g/L, no variation in COD removal efficiency indicates that there is no significant inhibitory effect of volatile fatty acids on the methanogens prevails at this retention time. The variation of
from 10 g/L to 40 g/L at the same retention time of 15 day (Fig. 5(b)), results in higher COD removal rates when compared with the simulation results of digester operated without considering wall growth factor. This is in agreement with the results obtained by Azeiteiro et al. (2001) under high loading rate conditions. Table 2 describes the comparison of the results observed when digester is operated with or without wall growth factor. If the digester is operated at higher
(between 40 g/L to 50 g/L) build up of volatile fatty acids cause inhibition to methanogens resulting in sharp decrease in COD removal efficiency at the same retention time of 15 day as observed in the case associated with wall growth factor (Fig. 5(c)). Operating digester at higher loading rate requires dilution in both the cases for optimizing process performance.
|
value from 40 g/L to 45 g/L at retention time of 20 day (Fig. 5(d)). However, further increase in
value from 55 g/L (Fig. 5(e)) to 60 g/L (Fig. 5(f)) resulted in instability of the digester conditions as COD removal efficiency decreased from 41.8% to 4.7%.
|
) of the range between 0.1 g/L - 0.3 g/L was observed even at higher
values in both batch and continuous processes. In order to avoid these situations, digester should be operated at higher values of
and
. During the start-up of the digester, the value of the microbial concentration should be high. Higher
(0.2 g/L) and
(0.7 g/L) values resulted in higher COD removal efficiency (55.2%) for the continuous process at a retention time of 10 day and at
of 10 g/L. COD removal efficiency decreases even at the same
(0.2 g/L) but with lower
value (0.5 g/L, 0.3 g/L and 0.1 g/L). This further indicates that proper acclimatization of microorganisms and constant process conditions are needed for better performance of digester.Consideration of wall growth factor in the model enhances the performance of digester as COD removal efficiency increases from 12% to 48% at the same
value of 20 g/L and retention time of 15 day. Dilution factor plays an important role under the inhibitory effect of volatile fatty acids in both situations, with or without wall growth factor. A step increase in substrate concentration
from 40 g/L to 45 g/L at the retention time of 15 day resulted in poor COD removal efficiency of 6.6%, while increasing retention time to 20 day increased the same to 43.3% under similar conditions. However, operating digester at higher retention time results in increase in the cost of process operations. Therefore, wall growth factor should always be considered for dynamic modelling and simulation of anaerobic digestion processes.