American Journal of Environmental Engineering
p-ISSN: 2166-4633 e-ISSN: 2166-465X
2012; 2(4): 80-85
doi: 10.5923/j.ajee.20120204.02
M.A. El-Borie 1, M. Abd-Elzaher 2, A. Al Shenawy 2
1Physics Dept., Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, P.O. 21511, Alexandria, Egypt
2Basic & Applied Science Department, College of Engineering, The Arab Academy for Science &Technology. P.O. 1029, Alexandria, Egypt
Correspondence to: M. Abd-Elzaher , Basic & Applied Science Department, College of Engineering, The Arab Academy for Science &Technology. P.O. 1029, Alexandria, Egypt.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
It is a clear fact that the Earth's climate has been changing since the pre-industrial era, especially during the last three decades. This change is generally attributed to two main factors: greenhouse gases (GHGs) and solar activity changes. However, these factors are not all-independent. Furthermore, contributions of the above-mentioned factors are still disputed. The aim of this paper is relation in the longer time (1880-2011), between changer of global surface temperature (GST), and solar geomagnetic activist represented by sunspot number (Rz) and geomagnetic indices (aa , Kp ), and to what degree they are connected. The geomagnetics aa are more effective on global surface temperature than solar activity. Furthermore, the global surface temperature are strongly sensitive to the 21.3-yr, 10.6-yr, and 5.3-yr variations that observed in the considered geomagnetic and sunspot spectra. The present changes in aa geomagnetics may reflect partially some future changes in the global surface temperatures.
Keywords: Global Surface Temperatures, Sunspot Number, Earth's Climate, Solar Activity Changes
Where:N represents the width, in samples, of a discrete-time window function. Typically it is an integer power of 2, such as 210 = 1024.n is an integer, with values 0 ≤ n ≤ N-1In our work we using hanning window, it is the most commonly used window function for random signals because it provides good frequency resolution and leakage protection with fair amplitude accuracy. FFT based measurements are subject to errors from an effect known as leakage. This effect occurs when the FFT is computed from of a block of data which is not periodic. To correct this problem appropriate windowing functions must be applied. When windowing is not applied correctly, then errors may be introduced in the FFT amplitude, frequency or overall shape of the spectrum. Figure 1, shows the 12-month running averages of global surface air temperature. It displays a substantial month- month variability, as well as, coherent long-term change over the period 1880 to 2009. The time interval is based on the coverage of both pre- and post-industrial growth era witnessed (~1930’s). The GSTs are seen to show a broad variation with clear minima near the ending/starting of the 19th century (~1892 and 1904). An important feature is that the temperature rose gradually by about ~ +0.42 ºC between 1892 and 1900 (~ 0.05 ºC/yr), and ~ 0.4 ºC between 1904 and 1914 (~ 0.04 ºC/yr). The global surface temperature substantially increased by ~ +0.64 ºC throughout the (1892-1940) period. So, the 1890-1940 was considered as the first warming period (~ +0.0134 ºC/yr)). The concentration of the man-made gases (greenhouse gases) increased and occurred after 1940 and therefore, it cannot be the cause of the +0.64 ºC warming that occurred within earlier years. Then, there was a cooling period (or constant period) of about ~ -0.2 ºC from 1940 to around 1964 (~ -0.008 ºC/yr), followed by a second phase of warming of about ~ +0.9 ºC from 1965 to 2008 (~ +0.02 ºC/yr or 0.2 ºC/decade). ![]() | Figure 1. The 12-month running averages of GST, aa, Rz, and Kp |
![]() | Figure 2. The normalized power spectra density for the GST, the geomagnetic indices aa and Kp and the sunspot number Rz |
The PSD is the Fourier Transform of the normalized autocorrelation function of lag
, of the signal if the signal can be treated as a stationary random process.
The power of the signal in a given frequency band can be calculated by integrating over positive and negative frequencies,
The power spectral density of a signal exists if and only if the signal is a wide-sense stationary process. If the signal is not stationary, then the autocorrelation function must be a function of two variables, so no PSD exists, but similar techniques may be used to estimate a time-varying spectral density.Relative power spectrum density =
For a comparison between GST and aa, we notice the following: during the period 1970-2008, the aa geomagnetic magnitude values have greatly increased than the previous years. The largest peak, over the considered period was in 2003, and the warmest year was 2008, of 5-yr apart. The second largest peak of geomagnetics aa was in 1992 corresponding to the third warmest peak (1998) in GST. El-Borie’s hypothesis displayed that the present changes in aa geomagnetics may reflect partially some future changes in the global surface temperatures[7] . The magnitudes of aa have greatly increased throughout the last four decades and the highest peak over the considered period was found in 2003 corresponding to the warm year was 2008. On the other hand, the second largest peak in aa spectrum occurred in 1992. For comparison, the separation-time between the second warmest year in 2003 and the greatest geomagnetic is about a few years, which may be indicated that the geomagnetic index aa is a considerable future factor on the magnitude of the global surface temperature with a lag time.Fig (2) shows the power spectral density analysis of global surface temperature (GST), geomagnetic indices (aa), (Kp) and sunspot number (Rz). A series of power spectral density (PSD) have been performed for the 12-month running averages throughout the period (1880-2008). The results were smoothed using the Hanning window function and each spectrum is independently normalized to the largest peak in the complete spectrum. The power spectrum density is calculated for the wide range of frequencies (2.5x10-3 - 0.5 c/m), which corresponding to a range from 33.3 year to 1 month.Plots show that there are no significant peaks observed in the high-frequency region > 4x10-2 c/m corresponding to the period from 1 month to less than 2 yr. A flat spectrum for the short-term fluctuations is observed. At the selected frequencies (>5 yr) the spectral density is high and it shows significant variations.Significant peaks are observed (plot 2a) for the global surface temperatures at wavelengths of 21.3, 15.5, 11.3, 8.9, 7.4, 5.3, 4.1, 3.6 and 2.9-2 yr, while (plot 2b) of aa displayed peaks at wavelengths 21.3, 14.2, 10.6, 8.9, 5.1 and 4.3 yr. In addition, the spectra of Rz shed the significant peak at 10.6 yr. In (plot 2b), the aa spectrum reflected the same remarkable peak of 10.6 yr with high amplitude. Also in (plot 2d) of Kp displayed peaks at wave length 10.6, 8.5, 5.3, and 3.5 yr. We found similar fluctuations of 21.3, 10.6-11.6, 8.9, 5.1-5.3 between aa and GST. Also, we found similar peaks 21.3, 10.6, 8.5-8.9 between Rz & GST. | [1] | Mann, M.E., Park, J., “Joint spatiotemporal modes of surface Temperature and sea level pressure variability in the Northern Hemisphere during the last century”. Journal of Climate 9, 2137–2162 ,1996. |
| [2] | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC 2001. In: Houghton, J.T., et al. (Eds.). Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2001. |
| [3] | Reid, G.C. “Influence of solar variability on global sea surface temperatures”. Nature 329, 142–143,1987. |
| [4] | Hoyt, D.V., and Schatten, K.H., “The role of the Sun in climate change”. Oxford University press 32, 1997. |
| [5] | Haigh, J.D., “ Modeling the impact of solar variability on climate”. Journal Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 61, 63–72, 1999. |
| [6] | Pulkkinen, T.I., Nevanlinna, H., Pulkkinen, P.J., Lockwood, M.,“The Sun– Earth connection in time scales from years to decades and centuries”. Space Science Reviews. 95, 625–637 ,2001. |
| [7] | El-Borie, M.A., and Al-Thoyaib, S.S., International J. of Physical Science, 1(2), 67, 2006. |
| [8] | El-Borie,M.A., Abdel-Halim, A.A., Shafik, E., and El-Monier, S.Y.,“Possibility of a Physical Connection Between Solar Variability and Global Temperature Change throughout the Period 1970-2008”, Inter. J. Res& Rev. in Applied Sci., 6(3), 296-301, 2011a. |
| [9] | El-Borie, M.A., Al-Sayed Aly , N., and Al-Taher, A., Mid-Term Periodicities of Cosmic Ray Intensities, J. Advanced Research, 2, 137-147, 2011b. |
| [10] | Eddy, J.A., “ The Maunder Minimum ”, Science. 192, 1189, 1976. |
| [11] | Rigozo, N.R., Echer, E., Vieira, L.E.A., Nordemann, D.J.R., “ Reconstruc- tion of Wolf sunspot number on the basis of spectral characteristics and estimates of associated radio flux and solar wind parameters for the last millennium ”. Solar Physics 203, 179 , 2001. |
| [12] | Landscheidt, T.,” 1st Solar & Space Weather, Tenerife” solar wind near Earth: indicator of variations in global temperature”, ESA-SP. 463, 497, 2000. |
| [13] | Shah, G. N., and Mufti, S., “Anti-podal geomagnetic activity, sea surface temperature and long-term solar variations”, 29th International Cosmic Ray Conference Pune 2 , 311, 2005. |
| [14] | El-Borie, M.A., “Major-Energetic particle fluxes: I. Comparison with the associated ground level enhancements of cosmic rays”, Astroparticle Phys. 19, 549, 2003a. |
| [15] | El-Borie, M.A.,“Major-Energetic particle fluxes: II. Comparison of the interplanetary between the three largest high energy peak flux events”, Astroparticle. Phys. 19, 667, 2003b . |
| [16] | Lassen, K., and Friis-Christensen, E., “ Variability of the solar cycle length during the past five centuries and the apparent association with terrestrial climate ”, J. Atmos & Solar. Terr. Phys. 57, 835, 1995. |
| [17] | El-Borie, M.A., Shafik, E., Abdel-halim, A.A., and El-Monier, S.Y., “Spectral Analysis of Solar Variability and their Possible Role on the Global Warming”. J. Environ. Protection 11, 2010. |
| [18] | Kilcik, A., “Regional Sun-climate interaction”. J. Atmos & Solar Terr. Phys. 67, 1573, 2005. |
| [19] | Haigh, J.D., “The Sun and the Earth climate”. Living Reviews in Solar Physics 4, 2, 2007. |
| [20] | Souza Echer, M.P., Echer, E., Nordemann, D.J.R., and Rigozo, N.R., “Multi-resolution analysis of global surface air temperature and solar activity relationship”. J. Atmos & Solar Terr. Phys. 71, 41, 2009. |
| [21] | Georgieva, K.,and Kirov, B. “Secular cycle of North–South solar asymmetry”. Bulg. J. Phys. 27 (2), 28, 2000. |
| [22] | Kilcik, A., Özgüç, A., Rozelot, J.P., and Yesilyurt, S., “Possible traces of solar activity effect on the surface air temperature of turkey”. J. Atmos & Solar Terr. Phys. 70, 1669, 2008. |
| [23] | Hansen, J.E., Lacis, A.A., “Sun and dust versus greenhouse gases: an assessment of their relative roles in global climate change”. Nature 346, 713–719, 1990 . |
| [24] | Wiscombe, W.J., “ An absorbing mystery ” . Nature 376, 466–467 ,1995 . |
| [25] | Wigley, T.M.L, “The observed global warming record: what does it tell us?”, The National Academy of Sciences. 94, 8314, 1997. |
| [26] | Tett, S.F.B., Stott, P.A., Allen, M.R., et al., “ Causes of twentieth-century temperature change near the Earth surface ”. Nature 399, 569–572 , 1999. |
| [27] | Lassen, K., and Friis-Christensen, E., “Solar cycle lengths and climate”. A reference revisited’ by P. Laut and J. Gundemann, J. Geophys. Res. 105 , 27493, 2000. |
| [28] | KasatKina, E.A., Shumilov, O.I., and kanatjev, ‘Solar Cycle, signature in atmosphere of the north Atlantic and Europe, Meteorology and Hydrology 1, 55-59, 2006. |
| [29] | El-Borie, M.A., “On long – term periodicities in solar-wind ion density and speed measurements during the period 1973-2000”, Solar Phys. 208, 345, 2002. |