American Journal of Condensed Matter Physics
p-ISSN: 2163-1115 e-ISSN: 2163-1123
2015; 5(1): 10-18
doi:10.5923/j.ajcmp.20150501.02
Y. K. Sharma, R. K. Singh, Sudha Pal
Department of Physics, S.B.S. Govt. Post Graduate College, Rudrapur, India
Correspondence to: Y. K. Sharma, Department of Physics, S.B.S. Govt. Post Graduate College, Rudrapur, India.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2015 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Sodium borosilicate glasses of the final composition (in wt.%) 68.94 SiO2 -22.55 Na2O- 1.91 CaO -4.96 K2O – 0.85 B2O3 -0.29 As2O3- x Pr6O11 (where x = 0.1,0.3 and 0.5) have been prepared by melt quenching technique. The absorption and fluorescence spectra have been recorded at room temperature. Energy interaction parameters i.e. Slater-Condon, Racah, Nephelauxetic ratio (β′) and bonding parameters (b1/2) have been computed from observed energy band to study the nature of bonding in doped glasses. The intensities of the 4f↔4f transitions in the absorption spectra have been analyzed by the Judd-Ofelt theory. Using the fluorescence data and JO parameters, various radiative properties for different emission lines have been computed. The values of A, β and σp for 3Po →3H4 and 3Po→3F2 transition are maximum, suggesting that they can be used as a most probable laser transitions. The values of σp for the transition 3Po→3F2 is high due to the presence of As2O3 in glass.
Keywords: Sodium borosilicate glass, Absorption spectrum, Fluorescence Spectrum, Energy Parameters, Judd-Ofelt Parameters and Radiative Properties
Cite this paper: Y. K. Sharma, R. K. Singh, Sudha Pal, Praseodymium Ion Doped Sodium Borosilicate Glasses: Energy Interaction and Radiative Properties, American Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, Vol. 5 No. 1, 2015, pp. 10-18. doi: 10.5923/j.ajcmp.20150501.02.
![]() | Figure 1. XRD of sodium borosilicate glass specimen |
|
![]() | Figure 2(a). Absorption spectrum of Pr3+ (0.5wt%) doped sodium borosilicate glass in the range 350 to 700nm |
![]() | Figure 2(b). Absorption spectrum of Pr3+(0.5 wt%) doped sodium borosilicate glass in the range 1000 to 2200nm at room temperature |
f can be expanded as a Taylor series expansion for a small variation of the energies. In the first order approximation the energy Ej of the jth level is given [13, 14] by ![]() | (1) |
for the observed levels of Pr3+ calculated by Wong [13, 14] and collected in Table 2. The values of
have been computed using Eq.1 by partial regression method. The values of
are then evaluated using equations ![]() | (2) |
are zero order values of corresponding parameters.
|
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
![]() | (6) |
parameters. The root mean square (r m s) deviation (σ) between calculated (Ecal) and experimental (Eexp) energies of the levels has been calculated which is defined by ![]() | (7) |
![]() | (8) |
is less than one, it indicates covalent bonding, while greater than one indicates ionic bonding. Henrie and Choppin [24] have defined another bonding parameter b1/2 in terms of
, given by ![]() | (9) |
parameters have been computed by using eqs.1-7 the observed energies of the bands, the values of zero order energies (E0j) and partial derivatives by the help of partial regression and least square method. The partial derivatives for praseodymium ion and observed energy of absorption band with their assignment have been collected in Table 2.Zero order parametersF2 = 305.0 cm-1, F4 =51.88 cm-1, F6 = 5.321 cm-1, ξ4f = 730.5 cm-1.The values of Fk, Ek and
parameters have been collected in Table 3. In the present glass specimens, the relation among different Fk parameters found as F2 > F4 > F6. It is interesting to note that the observed values of F4/F2 ~ 0.138 and F6/F2 ~ 0.015 are nearly same as calculated considering radial eigen function to be hydrogenic (F4/F2 ~ 0.14 and F6/F2 ~ 0.015) [26]. The Ek parameters have been given in Table 3, deduced from Fk parameters. The ratio of E1/E3 and E2/E3 are about 9.890 and 0.052 respectively, which are almost equal to the hydrogenic ratio. The values of nephlauxetic ratio (β′) and bonding parameter (b1/2) are 0.964 and 0.133 respectively (Table 3). The values of
and b1/2 is indicating covalent bonding. R.M.S deviation (σ) values is ±95.53. It’s indicating that energies are justifying Taylor series expansion.
|
![]() | (10) |
![]() | (11) |
is half band width. However, for a solid material it is generally expressed in terms of line strength Sexp which is related to oscillator strength Pexp by ![]() | (12) |
is the average energy of the transition in cm-1, J is the total angular momentum of the initial level, the factor ( n2 + 2 )2 / 9 represents the local field correction for an ion embeded in a dielectric medium of refractive index, n, under the tight binding approximation and the other symbols have their usual meaning. The oscillator strength, Pexp, of these transitions may be due to electric dipole, magnetic dipole or electric quadrupole or contribution from more than one of these modes. Thus the oscillator strength of the observed absorption band is given by ![]() | (13) |
Similar selection rules are followed by electric quadrupole transitions. Since both these modes have very small values of oscillator strength, it is clear that the contribution is mainly from electric dipole mode. However, for true electric dipole transitions the initial and final levels should have different parity, whereas no parity change is involved in f-f transitions. Hence for f-f transitions, though electric dipole transitions are forbidden, both magnetic dipole and electric quadruple transitions are allowed ones. Considering the observed intensities of these bands it is proposed that the induced electric dipole transitions may be operative.The basic idea of Judd – Ofelt theory is that the intensity of the forbidden f-f electric dipole transition can arise from the admixture of opposite parity configuration into the 4fn configuration, thus relaxing the parity restricted selection rule. The odd part of the crystal field potential is considered as a perturbation for mixing states of different parity into the 4fN configuration. In simple form the line strength (Scal) of an electric dipole transition between initial J manifold 
and terminal J′ manifold
is given by ![]() | (14) |
are the basis states in the LS coupling scheme and α represents an extra quantum number that might be necessary to describe the states completely, U(λ) are the unit tensor operators of rank
which are doubly reduced to yield the matrix elements
in the intermediate coupling [29], and Ωλ are the phenomenological Judd - Ofelt intensity parameters which specify the electric dipole moment between any two electronic levels and contain implicitily the odd symmetric crystal field terms, radial integrals, and perturbation denominators. An attempt has been made by Quimby and Miniscalco [30] to further modify the theory, though the basic consideration remains the same.In order to test the validity of Judd-Ofelt approach, employed to interpret the spectral intensities, a reduced chi –square test between Sexp and Scal values has been performed. The reduced chi –square is given [31] by![]() | (15) |
|
|
![]() | Figure 3. Fluorescence spectrum of Pr3+ (0.5 wt%) doped sodium borosilicate glass specimen and excitation wavelength 445 nm |
|
to a terminal manifold 
is given by![]() | (16) |

is defined as ![]() | (17) |
. It is given by ![]() | (18) |
to a terminal J manifold
, having a probability A is expressed as ![]() | (19) |
![]() | (20) |