American Journal of Condensed Matter Physics
p-ISSN: 2163-1115 e-ISSN: 2163-1123
2013; 3(3): 80-88
doi:10.5923/j.ajcmp.20130303.03
Beena Bhatia1, Vishal parihar1, Sanjay Singh2, A. S. Verma3
1Ceramics Laboratories, Department of Physics, Jai Narain Vyas University Jodhpur, 342001, India
2Department of Physics, Shyam Lal College, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110032, India
3Department of Physics, Banasthali Vidyapith, Rajasthan, 304022, India
Correspondence to: A. S. Verma, Department of Physics, Banasthali Vidyapith, Rajasthan, 304022, India.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Glasses of the system: xB2O3-10Bi2O3-30Li2O-xPr6O11 where x =1, 1.5 and 2 were prepared by melt quenching technique. Optical absorption and emission spectra have been recorded. The intensities of f-f transitions are calculated in term of Judd-Ofelt (JO) intensity parameters Ωλ (λ = 2, 4 and 6). Using the fluorescence data and these Ωλ parameters, various radiative properties like transition probability (A), branching ratio (βR), radiative lifetime (τR), and stimulated emission cross section (σp), of various emission lines have been evaluated. The values of these parameters indicate that for blue (3P0 → 3H4, 491 nm) transition can be considered to be good laser transition in the visible region.
Keywords: Doped Lithium Bismuth Borate Glasses, Judd-Ofelt Analysis, Optical Properties, Rare Earth Elements
Cite this paper: Beena Bhatia, Vishal parihar, Sanjay Singh, A. S. Verma, Spectroscopic Properties of Pr3+ in Lithium Bismuth Borate Glasses, American Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2013, pp. 80-88. doi: 10.5923/j.ajcmp.20130303.03.

![]() | Figure 1. XRD Pattern of Pr3+ : LBiB glasses |
![]() | Figure 2. UV-Vis transmission spectra of LBiB glass |
![]() | (1.1) |
![]() | (1.2) |
![]() | (1.3) |
![]() | (1.4) |
![]() | (1.5) |
![]() | (1.6) |
![]() | (1.7) |
![]() | (1.8) |
|
), which are computed by using following formulae[21]. The Nephelauxetic Ratio is given by![]() | (1.9) |
![]() | (2.0) |
is the average value of
.![]() | (2.1) |
![]() | (2.2) |
represents the concentration of rare earth ion in the glass and ‘
’ is its optical path length.
is called optical density,
is the half band width. In the present work, the intensities of all the bands are measured by the area method. The experimental and calculated oscillator strengths for Pr3+ ions in lithium bismuth borate glasses are given in Table 2.![]() | (2.3) |
![]() | (2.4) |
|
|
,
)
>| is given by:![]() | (2.5) |

]For Pr3+ ion, J’ = 0 or 1 and matrix elements of the doubly reduced unit tensor operator reported by P. Babu et al.[25] have been used.The fluorescence branching ratio for the transitions originating from a specific initial manifold │4fN (S', L')J'> to a final manifold
is given by![]() | (2.6) |
![]() | (2.7) |
is expressed as ![]() | (2.8) |
the peak fluorescence wavelength of the emission band and
is the effective fluorescence line width.![]() | Figure 3. Optical absorption spectra of Pr3+: LBiB glasses (a) UV-Vis region (b) NIR region |
. Low
values clearly indicate the accuracy of fitting. The experimental, calculated oscillator strengths and Judd–Ofelt intensity parameters of all Pr3+ lithium bismuth borate glasses are presented and compared with the other glass systems which are listed out in Table 2. From Table 2, it is observed that, for the transition 3H4→3P2 at 443 nm, the oscillator strength is very high compared with the other absorption transitions in all glasses. Thus, the transition 3H4→3P2 is known as the hypersensitive transition and follows the selection rules
,
, and
[27]. Table 3 shows that Ω2 increases whereas Ω4 and Ω6 decrease with increase in the Pr6O11 content in host glasses. The order of magnitude of Judd-Ofelt intensity parameter is Ω4< Ω6 < Ω2 for glass-A and Ω6< Ω4 < Ω2 for glass-B and glass-C. These intensity parameters reflect the local structure and bonding in the vicinity of rare earth ions to some extent. As a general conclusion, Ω2 parameter increases with asymmetry of the local structure and with the degree of covalency of the lanthanide-ligand bonds, wherease Ω6 parameter decreases with the tendency of covalency. Ω2 is higer for the present glasses in comparison to oxy-fluoride[28], lithium borate[25], PBOF[29], ZBLA[30], yttria-stabilized-zirconia (YSZ: ZrO2 -Y2O3)[31], tellufluoro-phosphate[4], ZnCdF (ZnF2 –CdF2)[32] and InF2[33]. Weber and Jacob[34] have reported that the ratio (Ω4/Ω6 ) known as the spectroscopic quality factor characterizes the glass concerned. The values of (Ω4/Ω6) for glasses under study are given in Table 3. Glass-A is having larger value of (Ω4/Ω6) than other two glasses and it shows that glass-A is a kind of better optical glass.Fig. 2 shows the transmission spectra of reference glass (LBiB glass) in the UV-Vis range. It is clear from this figure that, the LBiB glass has above 78% transmission in the optical window up to 0.387 µm. Fig. 4 present the excitation spectrum of Pr3+ ions doped glasses, which was measured by monitoring an intense emission at 606 nm. The excitation peaks from the excitation spectrum are assigned electronic transition with ground level 3H4 to higher energy level of Pr3+ , i.e., 3H4→3P0 (491.5 nm). Fig 5 shows the emission spectra of Pr3+: LBiB glasses, the most intense band in the absorption spectra around 3P2 level with 445 nm (diode laser) has been used for the excitation of Pr3+ ions. As a consequence of which, three strong fluorescence bands around 491, 530 and 606 nm, have been observed in the wavelength region 450-650 nm. The very weak fluorescence bands around 542 and 567 nm are not included in the analysis because of the uncertainties in the
determination.![]() | Figure 4. Excitation spectrum of Pr3+: LBiB glasses |
![]() | Figure 5. Emission spectrum of Pr3+: LBiB glasses |
) and the stimulated emission cross section (σp) values are calculated for present glasses. It could be observed that glass-A possess better values compared to the other two glass (B and C) system. The large stimulated emission cross section in lithium bismuth borate glasses suggests the possibility of utilizing these systems as laser materials. Thus, we could suggest that Pr3+: LBiB glasses are the suitable potential candidates for laser materials for blue (3P0 → 3H4, 491 nm) wavelength.| [1] | D.B. Gatch, S.A. Holmstrom, and W.M. Yen, J. Lumin. 83-84 (1999) 55. |
| [2] | Y. Zhao, S. Fleming, IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 33 (1997) 905. |
| [3] | A.A. Kaminskii, Laser Crystals, 2nd Edition, Springer, Berlin 1990. |
| [4] | R. Moorty, M. Jagasin, Mater. Chem. Phys. 93 (2005) 455. |
| [5] | Y.K. Sharma, S.P. Tandon, S.S. Surana, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 77 (2000) 167. |
| [6] | Y.C. Ratnakaram, A.V. Kumar, D.T. Naidu, N.O. Gopal, Mater.Lett. 58 (2004) 3908. |
| [7] | D.M. Baney, L. Yang, J.Ratcliff, K.W. Chang, Electron. Lett. 31 (1995) 1842. |
| [8] | C.H. Kam and S. Buddudu, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiant. Trans 325-337 (2004) 87. |
| [9] | G.A. Kumar, A. Martinez, E. Mejia and C.G. Eden, J. Alloys. Comp. 117-120 (2004) 365. |
| [10] | E. Culea, L. Pop and S. Simoon, Mater. Sci. Engg. 59-63 (2004) B 112. |
| [11] | J. Yang, S. Dai, Y. Zhou, Leiwen. Lili Hu and Z.H. Jiang, Appl. Phys. 977-983 (2003) 93 (2). |
| [12] | B.R. Judd, Phys. Rev. 127 (1962) 750. |
| [13] | G.S. Ofelt, J. Chem. Phys. 37 (1962) 511. |
| [14] | A. Shankar, A. Dasgupta, B. Babsu, A. Paul, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 4 (1983) 697. |
| [15] | B. Bendow, P. K. Banerjee, M.G. Drexhage and J. Lucas, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65 (1985) C 92. |
| [16] | J. Schroeder, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 40 (1980) 549. |
| [17] | Y. Ohisti, S.Mitachi and T. Tanabe, Phys. Chem. Glasses 24 (1983) 135. |
| [18] | J.E. Shelby, and J. Ruller, Phys. Chem. Glasses 28 (1987) 262. |
| [19] | M.M. Ahmed, C.A. Hogarth and M.N. Khan, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 19 (1984) 4040. |
| [20] | A. Klonkowski, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 72 (1985) 117. |
| [21] | S.P. Sinha, in: Complexes of the rare earths. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1996. |
| [22] | C. Gorller-Walrand, K. Binnemans, Spectral intensities of f-f transition, in: K.A. Gschneidner Jr., L. Eyring (Eds.), Handbook on the physics and Chemistry of rare earths, Vol. 25, North-Holland. Amsterdom, 1998 (Chapter 167). |
| [23] | Y.K. Sharma, S.S.L. Surana and R. K. Singh, J. of Rare Earth. 773 (2009) 27 (5). |
| [24] | C.H. Goublen, Mathods of Statistical Analysis, Asian Publishing House, Bombay, Ch. 8 (1964) 138. |
| [25] | P. Babu and C.K. Jayasankar, Physica B 326-340 (2001) 301. |
| [26] | I. Pal, A. Agarwal, S. Sanghi, M.P. Aggarwal, J. Alloys comp. 7625-7631 (2011) 509. |
| [27] | S. Tanabe, T. Ohyagi, N. Soga, T. Hanada, Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 3305.Za |
| [28] | R.T. Genova, I.R. Martine, U.R.R. Mendoza, F. Lahoz, A.D.L. Garrin, P. Nunez, J.G. Platas, V. Lavine, J. Alloys Compd. 380 (2004) 167. |
| [29] | P. Nachimuthu, R. Jagannathan, Phys. Chem. Glasses 36 (1995) 77. |
| [30] | M. Eyal, E. Greenberg, R. Reisfeld, Chem. Phys. Lett. 117 (1985) 108. |
| [31] | B. Savoini, J.E. Munoz Santiuste, R. Gonzalez, Phys. Rev. B 56 (1997) 5856. |
| [32] | M.A. Bunuel, R. Cases, M.A. Chamarro, R. Alcala, Phys. Chem. Glasses 33 (1992) 16. |
| [33] | A.B. Arauzo, R. Cases, R. Alcala, Phys. Chem. Glasses 35 (1994) 202. |
| [34] | R.R. Jacobs, M.J. Weber, IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 12 (1976) 102. |
| [35] | G.H. Dieke, Spectral and Energy Level of Rare Earth Ions in Crystal, Interscience, New York, 1968. |
| [36] | Q. Nie, X. Li, S. Dai, T. Xu, Z. Jin,X. Zhang, Spectrochim Acta A 70 (2008) 537. |