American Journal of Condensed Matter Physics
p-ISSN: 2163-1115 e-ISSN: 2163-1123
2012; 2(5): 126-134
doi:10.5923/j.ajcmp.20120205.04
Ali BENTOUAF, Mohammed AMERI, Rezki MEBSOUT, Djelloul HACHEMANE
Département de Physique, Faculté des Sciences, Université Djillali LIABES, Sidi-Bel, Abbès, 22000, Algérie
Correspondence to: Ali BENTOUAF, Département de Physique, Faculté des Sciences, Université Djillali LIABES, Sidi-Bel, Abbès, 22000, Algérie.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Based on the self-consistent ab initio the full-potential linear muffin-tin orbital (FP-LMTO) method, the structural, electronic, optical, and thermodynamic properties of AlAs1-xPx ternary semiconductor alloys have been investigated. The exchange–correlation potential was calculated using both the local density approximation (LDA) and generalized gradient approximation (GGA). The ground-state properties are determined for the cubic bulk materials AlAs, AlP, and their mixed crystals at various concentrations (x = 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75). Deviation of the lattice parameter from Vegard’s law and the bulk modulus from linear concentration dependence has been examined. The microscopic origins of the band-gap bowing parameter have been discussed. Moreover, the refractive index for AlAs1-xPx is studied using Reedy and Nazeer model. Besides, the thermodynamic stability of the alloys of interest is investigated by means of the miscibility critical temperature.
Keywords: FP-LMTO, Electronic Properties, Optical Properties, AlAs1-xPx Alloy
Cite this paper: Ali BENTOUAF, Mohammed AMERI, Rezki MEBSOUT, D, Structural and Electronic Properties Calculations of AlAs1-xPx Alloy, American Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, Vol. 2 No. 5, 2012, pp. 126-134. doi: 10.5923/j.ajcmp.20120205.04.
|
![]() | Figure 1. Composition dependence of the calculated lattice constants (solid squares) of GGA and (solid circle) of LDA of AlAs1-xPx alloy compared with Vegard’s prediction (dot line) |
|
![]() | Figure 2. Composition dependence of the calculated bulk modulus (red solid) of LDA and (black solid) of GGA of AlAs1-xPx alloy |
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
|
![]() | Figure 3. Variation of the calculated band gap versus x concentration of AlAs1-xPx alloys using both GGA and LDA exchange and correlation potentials |
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
![]() | (6) |
|
allows to describe the optical properties of the medium at all phonon energies. Calculations of the dielectric function involve the energy eigen-values and the electron wave functions. These are the natural output of the ab initio band structure calculation which is usually performed under LDA and GGA[30,31] .We have calculated the frequency dependent imaginary dielectric function and real dielectric function. The effects of using K points in the BZ have already been discussed in the earlier work by Khan et al (1993)[32]. The knowledge of both the real and the imaginary parts of the dielectric function allows the calculation of important optical functions. In this paper, we also present and analyze the refractive index
given by:![]() | (7) |
, we obtain the following relation:![]() | (8) |
![]() | (9) |
is the energy gap in eV. This equation is a straightforward modification of the original Moss equation[34], with a second arbitrary constant (0.365) added in order to improve the results obtained.In Table 6, we summarize the calculated values of the refractive index for the alloy under investigation, obtained by using the FP-LMTO method and Reddy et al. model. Comparison with the available data has been made where possible. It is clear that the values of the refractive index obtained by the FP-LMTO occur within the range of those obtained using Reddy et al. model; and for the end-point compounds (i.e. AlAs and AlP) are in good agreement with available experimental results.Fig. 4 shows the variation of the calculated refractive index versus concentration for the alloys. One can notice that the refractive index decreases monotonically with increasing P content over the entire range of 0–1 for both FP-LMTO and model used. The calculated refractive index versus concentration is fitted by a polynomial equation. The results are summarized as follows:![]() | (10) |
![]() | (11) |
![]() | (12) |
![]() | (13) |
|
![]() | Figure 4. Variation of the calculated refractive index versus x concentration of AlAs1-xPx alloys using both GGA and LDA exchange and correlation potentials |
![]() | (14) |
![]() | (15) |
![]() | (16) |
and
are the enthalpy and entropy of mixing, respectively;
the interaction parameter and depends on material; R the gas constant and T the absolute temperature.Indeed, an importance contribution arises from the mixing enthalpy, which can be obtained from the calculated total energies as
, where
,
and
are the respective energies of AlAs1-xPx alloy, and the binary compounds AlAs and AlP. We then calculated
to obtain
as a function of concentration. From a linear fit we obtained:
which shows the marginal dependence of
to the concentration x for AlAs1-xPx alloys.Now, we first calculate
by using Eqs. (14)–(16). Then we use the Gibbs free energy at different concentrations to calculate the T–x phase diagram which shows the stable, metastable and unstable mixing regions of the alloy. At a temperature lower than the critical temperature Tc, the two binodal points are determined as those points at which the common tangent line touches the
curves. The two spinodal points are determined as those points at which the second derivative of
is zero;
.![]() | Figure 5. T–x phase diagram for AlAs1-xPx alloys. Dotted line: binodal curve; solid line: spinodal curve |
, hence the phase diagram looks symmetric. We observed a critical temperature Tc of 719K for AlAs1-xPx alloys. The spinodal curve in the phase diagram marks the equilibrium solubility limit, i.e. the miscibility gap. For temperatures and compositions above this curve a homogeneous alloy is predicted. The wide range between spinodal and binodal curves indicates that the alloy may exist as a metastable phase. Hence our results indicate that the AlAs1-xPx alloys are stable at relatively high temperature.| [1] | I. Vurgaftman, J.R. Meyer, L.R. Ram-Mohan, J. Appl. Phys. 89 (2001) 5815. |
| [2] | S. Adachi, GaAs and Related Materials: BulkSemiconducting and Superlattice Properties, World Scientific, Singapore, 1994. |
| [3] | T. Ohnuma, M. Nagano, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 39 (2000) L972. |
| [4] | A. Morii, H. Okagawa, K. Hara, et al., Electron. Lett. 28 (1992) 836. |
| [5] | R.K. Soni, S. Tripathy, H. Asahi, Physica E 21 (2004) 131. |
| [6] | M.P. Semtsiv, U. Müller, W.T. Masselink, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 84102. |
| [7] | (a) M.-Z. Huang, W.Y. Ching, Phys. Rev. B 47 (1993) 9449; (b) M.-Z. Huang, W.Y. Ching, Phys. Rev. B 47 (1993) 9464. |
| [8] | A.R. Jivani, H.J. Trivedi, P.N. Gajjar, A.R. Jani, Pramana J. Phys. 64 (1) (2005) 153. |
| [9] | S.Zh. Karaahanov, L.C. Yan Voon, Semiconductors 39 (2) (2005) 161. |
| [10] | D.V. Khanin, S.E. Kulkova, Russ. Phys. J. 48 (1) (2005) 70. |
| [11] | Ali Hussain Reshak, S. Auluck, Physica B 395 (2007) 143. |
| [12] | J.P. Perdew, Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 45 (1992) 13244. |
| [13] | M. Briki, M. Abdelouhaba, A. Zaoui, M. Ferhat, Superlatt. Microstruct. 45 (2009) 80. |
| [14] | J.P. Perdew, S. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865. |
| [15] | (a) G.P. Srivastava, G.L. Martins, A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 31 (1985) 2561; (b) J.E. Bernard, A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 34 (1986) 5992. |
| [16] | S. Y. Savrasov, Phys. Rev. B 54 , (1996) 16470 |
| [17] | S. Savrasov, D. Savrasov, Phys. Rev. B 46 ( 1992) 12181 |
| [18] | D. Rached, M. Rabah, N. Benkhettou, M. Driz and B. Soudini Physica B : Physics of Condensed Matter, 337/1-4 (2003) pp. 394-403 |
| [19] | J.P. Perdew, Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 45 (1992) 13244. |
| [20] | J.P. Perdew, S. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865 |
| [21] | P. Blochl, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 49, 16223 (1994). |
| [22] | F.D. Murnaghan, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 30 (1944) 5390. |
| [23] | F. Annane, H. Meradji , S. Ghemid , F. El Haj Hassan, Computational Materials Science 50 (2010) 274–278. |
| [24] | K.-H. Hellwege, O. Madelung (Eds.), Semi-Conductor, Intrinsic Properties of Group IV Elements and III_V, II_VI and I_VII Compounds, Landolt-Bornstein New Series, Group III, vol. 22, Pt Springer, Berlin, 1982 |
| [25] | L. Vegard, Z. Phys. 5 (1921) 17. |
| [26] | M.P. Thompson, G.W. Auner, T.S. Zheleva, K.A. Jones, S.J. Simko, J.N. Hilfiker, J.Appl. Phys. 89 (2001) 3321. |
| [27] | P. Dufek, P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 7279. |
| [28] | F. El Haj Hassan, H. Akbarzadeh, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 121 (2005) 170. |
| [29] | W. Sargent, Table of Periodic Properties of the Elements, Sargent-Welch Scientific, Skokie, IL, 1980. |
| [30] | Alouani M, Koch J M and Khan M A J. Phys. F16 (1986) 437 |
| [31] | Koenig C and Khan M A Phys. Rev. B17 (1983) 6129 |
| [32] | Khan M A, Kashyap A, Solanki A K, Nautiyal T and Auluck S Phys. Rev. B48 (1993)16947 |
| [33] | Y. Al Douri, H. Abid, H. Aourag, Mater. Chem. Phys. 65 (2000) 117. |
| [34] | T.S. Moss, Phys. Status Solidi (b) 131 (1985) 415. |
| [35] | N.M. Ravindra, S. Anuch, V.K. Srinvastava, Phys. State Solid (b) 93 (1979) 115. |
| [36] | R. Reddy, Y. Nazeer Ahammed, Infra. Phys. Technol. 36 (1995) 825. |
| [37] | R.R. Reedy et al., J. Alloys Compd. 473 (2009) 28. |
| [38] | M. Anani, C. Mathieu, S. Lebida, Y. Amar, Z. Chama, H. Abid, Comput. Mater. Sci. 41 (2008) 570. |
| [39] | R.A. Swalin, Thermodynamics of Solids, Wiley, New York, 1961. |
| [40] | L.G. Ferreira, S.H. Wei, J.E. Bernard, A. Zunger Phys. Rev. B 40 (1989) 3197. |
| [41] | L.K. Teles, J. Furthmüller, L.M.R. Scolfaro, J.R. Leite, F. Bechstedt, Phys. Rev. B 62(2000) 2475 |