American Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
p-ISSN: 2165-8935 e-ISSN: 2165-8943
2016; 6(4): 149-161
doi:10.5923/j.ajcam.20160604.01

Ayine Azure Daniel, Yakubu Ibrahim Seini
Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
Correspondence to: Ayine Azure Daniel, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2016 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This paper investigates the effect of inclination on the heat and mass transfer characteristics of a heated plate with viscous dissipation. An incompressible ferrofluid such as polyethylene oxide solution is made to uniformly flow over a heated plate and a transverse magnetic field applied to regulate the flow. The partial differential equations modeling the problem include the equation of mass conservation, the momentum equation, the energy equation and the concentration equation. The system of partial differential equations are transformed to a system of non linear ordinary differential equations by similarity transformation and solved with maple 16 by using the fourth order Runge Kutta method. The effects of variation of the angle of inclination α, the viscous dissipation parameter N, the chemical reaction parameter β and other relevant parameters have been displayed graphically, and corresponding numerical results tabulated and analyzed. It was evident that an increase in the angle of inclination resulted in significant increments in the velocity profile and skin friction coefficient in the boundary layer. It was also observed that increasing the angle of inclination from
to
(the cooling angle) caused the plate’s temperature and concentration to decrease. However increasing the angle of inclination above
caused the temperature of the plate to increase. Also an increase in the viscous dissipation parameter caused the plate’s temperature to rise.
Keywords: Magneto-hydrodynamics (MHD), Ferrofluid, Inclination,Incompressible
Cite this paper: Ayine Azure Daniel, Yakubu Ibrahim Seini, MHD Boundary Layer Flow Past an Inclined Plate with Viscous Dissipation, American Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , Vol. 6 No. 4, 2016, pp. 149-161. doi: 10.5923/j.ajcam.20160604.01.
: Velocity components along the
and
axis directions, respectively
: Velocity of fluid far away from the plate
: Similarity variable
: Dimensionless velocity
: Acceleration due to gravity
: Fluid density
: Dynamic viscosity
: Kinematic viscosity
: Temperature
: Dimensionless Temperature
: Heat transfer coefficient
: Temperature of hot fluid
: Local thermal Grashof number
: Temperature of fluid far away from the plate
:Thermal expansion coefficient
: Thermal diffusivity
: Thermal conductivity
: Concentration
: Dimensionless concentration
: Plate surface concentration
: Free stream concentration
: Concentration expansion coefficient
: Local Solutal Grashof number
: Mass diffusivity
: Chemical reaction parameter
: Local Magnetic field parameter
: Magnetic field strength
: Local heat source parameter
: Heat source parameter
: Local convective heat transfer parameter
: Viscous dissipation parameter
: Angle of inclination
: Prandtl number
: Schmidt number
: Eckert number
: Fluid electrical conductivity
: Porosity parameter
axis is taken along the direction of the flat surface and the
axis measured normal to the surface of the plate. Flow is induced by the combined effect of convection in the boundary layer and inclination. It is assumed that the viscous incompressible ferrofluid continuously flow over the heated flat plate with a uniform thickness h. The effect of viscous dissipation and chemical reaction are considered in this study. The flat plate is tilted to variable angles to study the effect of inclination on the flow regime as in Figure.1.![]() | Figure 1. Flow of a Ferrofluid over an Inclined Plate |
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
and
are the dimensionless independent variable, stream function, temperature and concentration respectively. The stream function and the velocity components relate in the usual way as;![]() | (8) |
![]() | (9) |
![]() | (10) |
![]() | (11) |
![]() | (12) |
and
From (5) and (6) the corresponding dimensionless boundary conditions are:At the surface of the plate, 
![]() | (13) |
we obtained;![]() | (14) |


Hence the required first order system is;![]() | (15) |
;
As
we obtained;
|
|
, the Nusselt number
, temperature
, as well as the Sherwood number
have been discussed.Graphical results have also been illustrated for velocity, temperature and concentration profiles in the boundary layer region.It is observed in Table 3 that increasing the Biot number (Bi) increases the skin friction coefficient, the Nusselt and Sherwood numbers as well as the temperature of the fluid in the boundary layer. Thus, increasing the Biot number implies an increase in the heat transfer coefficient which enhances buoyancy in the boundary layer. Interaction between agitated fluid molecules and the surface of the plate results in increased shear stresses hence increasing the skin friction coefficient and temperature in the boundary layer.It is also observed that increasing the angle of inclination has a dual effect of decreasing and increasing the temperature and skin friction coefficient in the boundary layer as in Table 3. It can be observed that increasing the angle of inclination from
to
increases the Nusselt number and decreases the temperature and above
caused a decrease in the Nusselt number and increased temperature. However, increasing the angle of inclination generally results in increased Sherwood number. The skin friction also increased when the angle of inclination was increased between
and
and decreased above
. Increasing the magnetic field parameter significantly decreased the skin friction coefficient, Nusselt number and Sherwood number but increased the temperature of the fluid within the boundary layer. The magnetic field produces a Lorenz force which retards the motion of the fluid and reduces buoyancy; hence the heat transferred remains trapped in the boundary layer causing the rise in temperature as shown in Table 3.Again in Table 3, increasing the chemical reaction parameter caused a decrease in the skin friction coefficient and the Nusselt number but increased the Sherwood number and temperature. The fluid temperature increased due to exothermic reaction and reduced buoyancy of fluid molecules. Increasing the viscous dissipation and porosity parameters increased the local skin friction coefficient, the Sherwood number and the temperature of the fluid but decreased the Nusselt number. The increased temperature is associated with both parameters because they enhance interaction between molecules of the fluid and the plate’s surface as observed in Table 3.It is observed in Table 4 that increasing the Prandtl, Eckert numbers and local heat generation parameter significantly increased the local skin friction coefficient. The Sherwood number and the temperature of the fluid also increased when the Prandtl, Eckert numbers and the local heat generation parameters were increased. However it resulted in a decreased Nusselt number.It is again observed in Table 4 that increases in both thermal and solutal Grashof numbers increased the skin friction coefficient, the Sherwood number and the Nusselt number, resulting in marginal decreases in wall temperature of the plate. An increase in each of these parameters improves buoyancy and convection, which enable fluid molecules to efficiently move away from the plate’s surface leading to reduction in temperature. However shear stresses between the energetic molecules and the surface of the inclined plate accounts for the increased skin friction coefficient.We further observed that increases in Schmidt number decreased the local skin friction coefficient and the Nusselt number but increased the Sherwood number and plate’s wall temperature as depicted numerically in Table 4.
|
|
![]() | Figure 5.1. Effect of variation of angle of inclination on velocity profile |
![]() | Figure 5.2. Effect of variation of viscous dissipation parameter (N) on velocity profile |
![]() | Figure 5.3. Effect of variation of thermal Grashof number (Gr) on velocity profile |
![]() | Figure 5.4. Effect of variation of solutal Grashof number (Gc) on velocity profile |
![]() | Figure 5.5. Effect of variation of Magnetic Parameter (M) on velocity profile |
![]() | Figure 5.6. Effect of variation of Local heat source parameter (Q) on velocity profile |
![]() | Figure 5.7. Effect of variation of Eckert number (Ec) on velocity profile |
![]() | Figure 5.8. Effect of variation of Biot number (Bi) on velocity profile |
![]() | Figure 5.9. Effect of variation of Porosity on velocity profile |
![]() | Figure 5.10. Effect of variation of angle of inclination on Temperature profile |
![]() | Figure 5.11. Effect of variation of Prandtl number (Pr) on Temperature profile |
![]() | Figure 5.12. Effect of variation of Eckert number on Temperature profile |
![]() | Figure 5.13. Effect of variation of viscous dissipation parameter (N) on Temperature profile |
![]() | Figure 5.14. Effect of variation of Schmidt number (Sc) on Temperature profile |
![]() | Figure 5.15. Effect of variation of Local heat generation parameter (Q) on Temperature profile |
![]() | Figure 5.16. Effect of variation of Biot number (Bi) on Temperature profile |
![]() | Figure 5.17. Effect of variation of angle of inclination on Concentration profile |
![]() | Figure 5.18. Effect of variation of Schmidt number on Concentration profile |
![]() | Figure 5.19. Effect of variation of Magnetic Parameter on Concentration profile |
![]() | Figure 5.20. Effect of variation of Chemical Reaction Parameter on Concentration profile |
. The velocity also increased when other parameters such as viscous dissipation (N), thermal Grashof number (Gr), Solutal Grashof number (Gc), Porosity
, Eckert number (Ec), Biot number (Bi) and local heat generation (Q) were increased. A decrease in velocity was also observed when the magnetic field parameter (M) was increased. ii. The temperature also decreased significantly when the angle of inclination was increased from
to
(“cooling angle”) and increased when the angle of inclination was greater than
. The temperature decreased when both thermal and solutal Grashof numbers (Gr) and (Gc) respectively were increased. However a rise in temperature was observed when the Prandtl number (Pr), Eckert number (Ec), Biot number (Bi), viscous dissipation parameter (N), Schmidt number (Sc) and local heat generation Parameter (Q) were increased. The concentration in the boundary layer decreased with increased angle of inclination
. A decreased concentration was also observed when the chemical reaction paraeter
, the Schmidt number
, thermal Grashof number
, solutal Grashof number
and Biot number
were increased. However an increase in concentration in the boundary layer was observe when the magnetic field parameter (M) was increased. It is therefore recommended that; In applying the technique of inclination to enhance cooling of materials in industrial processes, the range of the “cooling angle” should be considered. The chemical reaction parameter and Schmidt number which enhances mass diffusivity should be considered in processes involving fluid transportation. The viscous dissipation parameter had an integral effect in increasing the temperature in the boundary layer and should be considered in the design of heating systems.