American Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics

p-ISSN: 2165-8935    e-ISSN: 2165-8943

2016;  6(1): 1-6

doi:10.5923/j.ajcam.20160601.01

 

On a Certain Subclass of Harmonic Multivalent Functions

Waggas Galib Atshan 1, Enaam Hadi Abd 2, 3

1Department of Mathematics, College of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Al-Qadisiya, Diwaniya, Iraq

2Department of Computer, College of Science, University of Kerbala, Kerbala, Iraq

3Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

Correspondence to: Waggas Galib Atshan , Department of Mathematics, College of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Al-Qadisiya, Diwaniya, Iraq.

Email:

Copyright © 2016 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a certain subclass of harmonic multivalent functions in the unit disk We obtain some interesting properties, like, coefficient conditions, convex set, distortion theorems, weighted mean.

Keywords: Harmonic multivalent functions, Distortion theorem, Convex set

Cite this paper: Waggas Galib Atshan , Enaam Hadi Abd , On a Certain Subclass of Harmonic Multivalent Functions, American Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , Vol. 6 No. 1, 2016, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.5923/j.ajcam.20160601.01.

1. Introduction

A continuous function is a complex-valued harmonic function in a domain if both u and v are real harmonic in D. In any simply connected domain we can write where h and g are analytic in D. We call h the analytic part and g the co-analytic part of f. The harmonic function is sense-preserving and locally one-to-one in D if in D. See Clunie and Sheil-Small [3].
For denote by the class of functions that are harmonic multivalent and sense-preserving in the unit disk where are defined by
(1)
which are analytic and multivalent functions in U .
Also, denote by subclass of consisting of harmonic functions where and are of the form
(2)
In 1984, Clunie and Sheil-Small [3] investigated the class and as well as its geometric subclasses and obtained some coefficient bounds. Since then, there have been several related papers on and its subclasses. For more basic results one may refer to the following standard
introductory text book by Duren [4], see also Ahuja [1], Jahangiri et al. [5] and Ponnusamy and Rasila ([6], [7]).
The convolution of two functions of form
(3)
Let denote the subclass of consisting of functions that satisfy the condition
(4)
Define
Lemma (1) [2]: Let Then if and only if where w be any complex number.

2. Coefficient Estimates

We begin with a sufficient condition for the function in to be the class
Theorem (2.1): Let defined in (1). If
(5)
Where then is harmonic Multivalent sense-preserving in U and
Proof: Let
By lemma (1), we must show that (4) holds true. It suffices to show that
Substituting for w and resorting to simple calculation, we find
Theorem (2.2): Let with h and g given by (2). Then if and only if
(6)
Proof: From theorem (2.1) to prove the necessary part, let us assume that using (4), we get
If we choose z to be real and let we obtain the condition (6) and the proof is complete.

3. Convex Set

Theorem (3.1): The class is convex set.
Proof: Let the function be in the class It is sufficient to show that the function defined by:
(7)
is in the class we have
Since for
In view of Theorem (2.1), we have
Hence, . This completes the proof.

4. Distortion and Covering

The next Theorem is on the distortion and covering bounds for functions in the class
Theorem (4.1): If then
(8)
and
(9)
Proof: Assume that Then by Theorem (2.2), we obtain
Relation (9) can be proved by using the similar statements.
The covering result given in corollary (4.2) follows from the inequality (9) of this Theorem.
Corollary(4.2): If then

5. Weighted Mean

Definition (5.1): Let where
Then the weighted mean is given by
In the theorem below, we will show the weighted mean for this class:
Theorem (5.2): If and be in the class then the weighted mean of is also in the class
Proof: By Definition (5.1), we have
Since are in the class so by Theorem (2.2), we get
and
Then

References

[1]  O. P. Ahuja, Palnar harmonic univalent and related mapping, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 6, No. 4 (2005), 122, 1-18.
[2]  E. S. Aqlan, Some Problems Connected with Geometric Function Theory, Ph.D. Thesis (2004), Pune University, Pune.
[3]  J. Clunie, T. Shell-Small, Harmonic univalent functions, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. Al. Math., 9, No. 3 (1984), 3-25.
[4]  P. Duren, Harmonic Mappings in the Plane, Cambridge Tract in Mathematics, 156, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
[5]  J. M. Jahangiri, Chan Kim Young, H. M. Srivastava, Construction of a certain class of harmonic close to convex functions associated with the alexander integral transform, Integral Transform Spec.. Funct., 14, No. 3 (2003), 237-242.
[6]  S. Ponnusamy, A. Rasila, Planar harmonic mapping, RMS Mathematics Newsletter, 17, No. 2 (2007), 40-57.
[7]  S. Ponnusamy, A. Rasila, Planar harmonic and quasicon formal mappings, RMS Mathematics Newsletter, 17, No. 3 (2007), 85-101.