[1] | Pekmezci, M., McDonald, E., Kennedy, A., Dedini, R., McClellan, T., Ames, C., and Deviren, V., 2012, Can a novel rectangular footplate provide higher resistance to subsidence than circular footplates? An ex vivo biomechanical study, Spine, 37(19), E1177–E1181. |
[2] | Auerbach, J.D., Ballester, C.,M., Hammond, F., Carine, E.,T, Balderston, R.,A., Elliott, D.,M., 2010, The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement, The Spine Journal, (10), 333–340. |
[3] | Nekkanty, S., Yerramshetty, J., Kim, D., Zauel, R., Johnson, E., Cody, D., D., Yeni, Y., N., 2010, Stiffness of the endplate boundary layer and endplate surface topography are associated with brittleness of human whole vertebral bodies, Bone, 47(4), 783–789. |
[4] | Kelly, N., Harrison, N., M., McDonnell, P., McGarry, J., P., 2013, An experimental and computational investigation of the post-yield behaviour of trabecular bone during vertebral device subsidence, Biomech Model Mechanobiol., (12), 685–70. |
[5] | Adam, C., Pearcy, M., McCombe, P., 2003, Stress analysis of interbody fusion--finite element modelling of intervertebral implant and vertebral body, Clin Biomech., 18(4), 265-72. |
[6] | Luo, J., Skrzypiec, D., M., Pollintine, P., Adams, M., A., Annesley-Williams, D., J, Dolan, P., 2007, Mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty: Influence of cement type, BMD, fracture severity, and disc degeneration, Bone, (40), 1110–1119. |
[7] | Palm, W., J., 4th, Rosenberg, W., S., Keaveny, T., M., 2002, Load transfer mechanisms in cylindrical interbody cage constructs, Spine, 27(19), 2101-7. |
[8] | Hulme, P., A., Ferguson, S., J., Boyd, S., K., 2008, Determination of vertebral endplate deformation under load using micro-computed tomography, Journal of Biomechanics, (41), 78–85. |
[9] | Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Gao, Q., Shao, B., Xiao, J., Zhou, H., Niu, Q., Shen, M., Liu, B., Hu, K., Kong, L., 2014, The variation of cancellous bones at lumbar vertebra, femoral neck, mandibular angle and rib in ovariectomized sheep, Arch Oral Biol., 59(7), 663-9. |
[10] | Kurtz, S., M., Devine, J., N., 2007, PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants, Biomaterials, 28(32), 4845-69. |
[11] | Palissery, V., Mulholland, R., C., McNally, D., S., 2009, The implications of stress patterns in the vertebral body under axial support of an artificial implant, Medical Engineering & Physics, (31), 833–837. |
[12] | Seidel, H., Pöpplau, B., M., Morlock, M., M., Püschel, K., Huber, G., 2008, The size of lumbar vertebral endplate areas-Prediction by anthropometric characteristics and significance for fatigue failure due to whole-body vibration, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(9–10), 844–855. |
[13] | ASTM F2346- 05, 2011, Standard Test Methods for Static and Dynamic Characterization of Spinal Artificial Discs, ASTM International. |
[14] | Lill, C., Schneider, E., Goldhahn, J., Haslemann, A., Zeifang, F., 2006, Mechanical performance of cylindrical and dual core pedicle screws in calf and human vertebrae, Arch OrthoTrauma Surg., (126), 686‐694. |
[15] | Wilke, H., J., Neef, P., Caimi, M., Hoogland, T., Claes, L., 1999, New intradiscal pressure measurements in vivo during daily activities, Spine, 24(8):755-762. |
[16] | Yamaoka, K., Nakagawa, T., Uno, T., 1978, Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 6(2),165-175. |
[17] | Silva, M., J., Wang, C., Keaveny, T., M., Hayes, W., C., 1994, Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human, lumbar vertebral shell and endplate, Bone. 1994, 15(4), 409-14. |
[18] | Moore, R., J., 2000, The vertebral end-plate: what do we know?, Eur Spine J., (9), 92–96. |
[19] | Tanaka, M., Nakahara, S., Inoue, H., 1993, A pathologic study of discs in the elderly. Separation between the cartilaginous endplate and the vertebral body, Spine, 18(11), 1456–1462. |
[20] | Polikeit, A., Ferguson, S., J., Nolte, L., P., Orr, T., E., 2003, Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis, Eur Spine J., (12), 413–420. |
[21] | Penzkofer, R., Hofberger, S., Spiegl, U., Schilling, C., Schultz, R., Augat, P., Gonschorek, O., 2011, Biomechanical comparison of the end plate design of three vertebral body replacement systems, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg., (131), 1253–1259. |
[22] | Krammer, M., Dietl, R., Lumenta1, C., B., Kettler, A., Wilke, H., J., BuÈttner, A., and Claes, L., 2001, Resistance of the lumbar spine against axial compression forces after implantation of three different posterior lumbar interbody cages, Acta Neurochir (Wien), (143), 1217-1222. |
[23] | Wang, X., Dumas, G., A., 2005, Evaluation of effects of selected factors on inter-vertebral fusion-a simulation study, Med Eng Phys., 27(3), 197-207. |
[24] | Ferretti, M., Palumbo, C., Contri, M., Marotti, G., 2002, Static and dynamic osteogenesis: two different types of bone formation, Anat Embryol., (206), 21–29. |
[25] | Marotti, G., 2010, Static and dynamic osteogenesis, IJAE., 15(1/2), 123-126. |