American Journal of Biochemistry
p-ISSN: 2163-3010 e-ISSN: 2163-3029
2015; 5(6): 131-137
doi:10.5923/j.ajb.20150506.01

Areola J. O.1, Babalola O. O.2, Ilesanmi O. R.3, Oyedapo O. O.2
1Department of Medical Biochemistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
2Department of Biochemistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
3Department of Pharmacology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
Correspondence to: Areola J. O., Department of Medical Biochemistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2015 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Thisstudy was designed to investigate the toxicity ofethanolic stem bark extract of Miliciaexcelsa in wistar rats. The ethanolic extract was screened for secondary metabolites to determine its phytochemical constituents. The acute toxicity of the extract was determined in mice with a view to estimating its median lethal dose (LD50). For sub-chronic toxicity study, twenty wistar rats with average weight of 184.50 ± 3.21 g were randomly assigned into four groups (I-IV) of five rats each. Animals in groups II-IV were orally administered with ethanolic extract at the doses of 250, 500 and 750 mg/kg body weight respectively once daily for 28 days, while those in the control group (group I) received 2 ml of 5% dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO/water 5:95 v/v) daily. The results of this study showed that flavonoids, tannins, saponins, cardiac glycosides and terpenoids are the major secondary metabolites present in the extract. The LD50 was found to be greater than 5 g/kg body weight. The results of biochemical analyses showed that the concentrations of plasma protein, albumin, bilirubin, creatinine and uric acid in the extract treated rats (groups II- IV) were not significantly different (p > 0.05) from the control (group I). Similarly, the activities of hepatic marker enzymes in the plasma showed that AST, ALP and GGT activities in all the treated groups were not significantly different from control group. However, the ALT activity of the extract treated groups was lower than its activity in the control group and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Also, the antioxidant enzymes (SOD and CAT) activities in the treatment groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05) from control group. The results of this study suggest that prolonged use of ethanolic stem bark extract of Milicia excelsa might not have adverse effects on the liver and kidney at the tested doses in this study.
Keywords: Milicia excelsa, Stem-Bark, Toxicity, Ethanolic extract, Phytochemical
Cite this paper: Areola J. O., Babalola O. O., Ilesanmi O. R., Oyedapo O. O., Toxicity Studies of the Ethanolic Stem- Bark Extract of Milicia excelsa (Welw.) C. C. Berg in Wistar Rats, American Journal of Biochemistry, Vol. 5 No. 6, 2015, pp. 131-137. doi: 10.5923/j.ajb.20150506.01.
2 g) and white albino rats (20) with average weight of (184.5
3.2 g) were obtained from the Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. The animals were acclimatized, fed and watered ad libitum for 4 weeks before the commencement of experiment. Preparation of Ethanolic ExtractThe stem-barks of M. excelsa were washed, cut into tiny bits, shade dried for four weeks and ground into powder with electrical milling machine. The powdered stem bark (1kg) was macerated in 70% (v/v) ethanol (3L) for 72 hr at room temperature with regular shaking. The suspension was filtered; the residue was re-suspended and re-extracted until the filtrate became colourless. The filtrates were combined, concentrated under reduced pressure in rotary evaporator (Edman High Vacuum Pump) at 40°C and lyophilized. Phytochemical ScreeningThe ethanolic extract of M. excelsa was screened for the presence of secondary metabolites according to standard procedures [10] and [11]. Alkaloid: extract (0.1 g) was stirred in 10% (v/v) HCl on a steam bath followed by filtration. The filtrate (1ml) was separately mixed with a few drops of Meyer’s, Wagner’s and Drangendorff’s reagents. The mixtures were observed for turbidity or formation of precipitate; Saponin: extract (0.1 g) was suspended in distilled water (5 ml) and shaken vigorously until froth appeared. The tube and its content was warmed in water bath for 10 min, presence or absence of frothing was noted after warming; Tannins: extract (0.1 g) was taken up in 10 ml-distilled water and filtered. To 1 ml of the filtrate, a few drops of ferric chloride solution were added and mixture observed for formation of blue, blue-black, green or green--black colouration or precipitate; Flavonoids: extract (0.1 g) in 5 ml ethanol was shaken and filtered. To 1 ml of the filtrate, few drops of 0.5 N alcoholic KOH were added and the mixture observed for yellow coloration or precipitate; Cardiac glycosides: extract (0.1 g) was suspended in 5 ml chloroform and filtered. To the filtrate, concentrated sulphuric acid (2 ml) was carefully layered at the bottom of the tube without disturbing the solution. It was observed for the formation of a sharp brown ring at the chloroform / sulphuric acid interface. Toxicological InvestigationAcute Toxicity StudyAlbino mice (18) were randomly divided into six groups of three mice per group and the study was carried out in two phases: First phase: three groups of mice were randomly selected; the ethanolic extract was prepared using 5% dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO/water 5:95 v/v) as vehicle, at doses of 100 mg/kg bwt, 1000 mg/kg bwt and 2000 mg/kg bwt., the extract was administered once to the three groups of mice respectively. The mice were monitored for mortality and signs of toxicity such as foaming in the mouth, food refusal and convulsion during the first 1 hour, then at 2 hours interval for the next 6 hours and everyday for 72 hours. Signs of toxicity were recorded for each group during the observation period.Phase two acute toxicity study was carried out based on the outcome of first phase study. The remaining three groups were used for phase two of the study. The extract at 3000, 4000 and 5000 mg/kg body weight were administered to the three sets of mice respectively. The mice were monitored for signs of toxicity and mortality as was done in the first phase. Median lethal dose (LD50) was calculated according to the arithmetic method of Karbar as reported by Saidu et al. (2007) [12].Sub-chronic Toxicity StudyGrouping and Treatment of AnimalsThe appropriate weight of the ethanolic extract was dissolved in the vehicle to give final doses of 250, 500 and 750 mg/kg body weight. The rats were treated orally once daily for 28 consecutive days. A total of twenty (20) wistar rats were randomly divided into 4 groups of five animals as follows:I: Rats + 2ml distilled water (control)II: Rats + 250 mg / kg bwt.III: Rats + 500 mg / kg bwt.IV: Rats + 750 mg / kg bwt. On the 28th day, the animals were fasted overnight and sacrificed on day 29. Blood was collected by cardiac puncture using disposable pyrogen free needle into heparinized tubes. The liver and kidney were removed aseptically, washed free of blood, dried on tissue paper, wrapped with aluminium foil paper and kept frozen. Preparation of Plasma The blood was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min; the plasma (supernatant) was carefully collected and used for the biochemical assays. Liver and kidney (1 g each) were homogenized separately in 10 ml of freshly prepared 100 Mm phosphate buffer, pH 6.8 and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatants were transferred into separate clean vial bottles and used for the assay of antioxidant enzymes and hepatic marker enzymes.Liver and kidney (1 g each) were homogenized separately in 10 ml of freshly prepared 100 Mm phosphate buffer, pH 6.8 and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatants were transferred into separate clean vial bottles and used for the assay of antioxidant enzymes and hepatic marker enzymes.Biochemical AnalysesRandox Diagnostic Kits were used for all the enzymatic assays. Plasma protein determination was according to Bradford (1976) [13] method: The assay mixture consisted of plasma or liver homogenate (20 µL), distilled water (780 µL) and Bradford reagent (200 µL). The absorbance was read immediately at 595nm and protein concentrations estimated from standard protein curve. Albumin was according to Pinnell and Northam (1978) [14], bromo-cresol green concentrate solution was added to test tubes labeled (blank, standard and sample) in triplicates. Standard albumin solution (10 µL) was added to test tube labeled standard while 0.85% NaCl (10 µL) and plasma (10 µL) were added to the tubes labeled blank and sample respectively. The tubes were mixed, incubated for 20 min at room temperature and the absorbance read at 578nm against the blank within 60 min. Albumin concentration in the plasma was estimated using the formula provided in the manual. Bilirubin concentrations was according to Jendrassisk and Grof (1938) [15], two sets of clean test tubes (blank and sample) were arranged in triplicates, 0.2 ml of reagent 1 was added to both blank and sample tubes, (10 µL) of reagent 2 was added to sample tubes only. Reagent 3 (10 µL) and (200 µL) plasma were added to blank and sample tubes. The reaction mixture were thoroughly mixed and allowed to stand for 10 min at room temperature. Finally, reagent 4 (1000 µL) was added to all the tubes, mixed, incubated at room temperature for 20 min and absorbance was read at 578nm against the sample blank. Total bilirubin concentration was calculated using this expression: Total bilirubin (mg/dl) = 10.8 x Abs of sample. Creatinine was estimated according to the procedure described by Chawla, (1999) [16]; working reagent (2000 µL) was added to two sets of test tubes in triplicate (labeled sample and standard). Plasma (200 µL) and standard creatinine solution (200 µL) were added to sample and standard tubes respectively. The reaction mixture was allowed to stand for 30 seconds, the absorbance A1 was read at 520nm and exactly 2 min later, absorbance A2 was read. Concentration of creatinine (mg/dl) was calculated using the expression: [(A2 - A1) sample/ (A2 - A1) standard] x standard concentration (mg/dl). Alkaline Phosphatase activity was according to the method of Sanni and Van-Eteh, (1978) [17]. The assay mixture consisted of plasma (20µ) or liver homogenate (50 µl) in triplicates and incubated at 30°C for 3 min. The blank was prepared using water instead of the liver homogenates or plasma samples. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 1000 µl of substrate and the absorbance was read against the reagent blank at 405nm for 3 min at 1 min interval. The activity of alkaline phosphatase was calculated using the expression below: Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) = 2760 x ∆A 405 nm/min. The aminotransferases (L-alanine and L-aspartate) were assayed according to the method of Reitman and Frankel (1957) [18]. The assay mixture consisted of the respective substrate (250 µl) and blood plasma (50 µl); the contents of the tubes were mixed thoroughly and incubated in a water- bath at 37°C for 30 min followed by the addition of 2, 4–dinitrophenylhydrazine (250 µl). The mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 20 min after which 2500 µl of NaOH solution was added to terminate the reaction. The absorbance was read at 546 nm against the sample blank and the activity of the enzyme was extrapolated from a standard curve. Gamma glutamyltransferase activity was determined according to the method of Szasz (1969) [19]. To 100 µl of the plasma, 1000 µl of buffered substrate reagent was added. The solution was mixed and the timer started simultaneously. The absorbance was read at time 0, 1, 2 and 3 minutes against the reagent blank at 405 nm. The activity of GGT was calculated as follows: GGT (U/L) = 1158 x ∆Abs at 405nm. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase activities were determined according to the method of Mistra and Fridovich (1972) [20] and Aebi (1973) [21] respectively.
|
|
|
|