Advances in Analytical Chemistry

p-ISSN: 2163-2839    e-ISSN: 2163-2847

2020;  10(2): 20-25

doi:10.5923/j.aac.20201002.02

Received: Nov. 3, 2020; Accepted: Nov. 30, 2020; Published: Dec. 15, 2020

 

Antioxidant Activity of Five Medicinal Plants Extrats Used for Management of Bacterial Diseases in Burkina Faso

Jules Yoda1, 2, Seydou Sourabié1, 3, Angèle Zoungrana1, 3

1Department of Medicine, Traditional Pharmacopeia and Pharmacy (MEPHATRA/Ph)/ Research Institute for Health Sciences (IRSS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

2Laboratory of Molecular Chemistry and Materials (LC2M), Team of Organic Chemistry and Phytochemistry (ECOP), University Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

3Pharmacognosy Laboratory, (UFR/SDS), University Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

Correspondence to: Jules Yoda, Department of Medicine, Traditional Pharmacopeia and Pharmacy (MEPHATRA/Ph)/ Research Institute for Health Sciences (IRSS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Email:

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

The plant biodiversity of Burkina Faso abounds with countless plants, some of which are of proven medicinal interest. The objective of this work is to highlight five (5) medicinal plants including Psidium guajava, Euphorbia hirta, Combretum micranthum, Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Terminalia avicennioides used in the management of bacterial infections. Recent work shows that many microbial pathologies, particularly bacterial and viral infections, are linked to oxidative stress induced by the production and development of free radicals. In this study, we established the chemical profile of the extracts in therapeutic compounds of interest such as phenolic compounds. The antioxidant activity of the decocted extracts of these five plants was studied by several methods including the DPPH tests, the ABTS test and the lipid peroxidation test. Significant and interesting results were obtained.

Keywords: Traditional medicine, Antibacterial activity, Phytochemical screening, Antioxidant, Activity

Cite this paper: Jules Yoda, Seydou Sourabié, Angèle Zoungrana, Antioxidant Activity of Five Medicinal Plants Extrats Used for Management of Bacterial Diseases in Burkina Faso, Advances in Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 10 No. 2, 2020, pp. 20-25. doi: 10.5923/j.aac.20201002.02.

1. Introduction

The discovery of antibiotics was a real revolution in the fight against infectious diseases. However, inappropriate consumption and misuse of antibiotics has accelerated the selection of multi-resistant bacteria, which is currently a real problem for antibiotic therapy and public health [1]. Thus, the use of natural resources in general and medicinal plants in particular is emerging as one of the most important and interesting approaches to explore in the search for new and more effective antibacterial drugs [2]. In addition, it is recognized in the scientific community that products of natural origin are an important source of therapeutic agents for microbial diseases that claim a large number of victims in terms of mortality rates [3-5]. Indeed, antimicrobial compounds extracted from certain plants can inhibit bacterial growth by different mechanisms. The interest of our work lies in the study of the antioxidant activity of five plants including Psidium guajava L., Euphorbia hirta L., Combretum micranthum G. Don, Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn and Terminalia avicennioides Guill. & Perr.. The antibacterial activity of these plants is well known, and their role in the fight against oxidative stress induced during infections is being investigated. In the defense process of the organism during infections, there is the production of free radicals by various mechanisms. The anti-radical activity of a compound is associated with its ability to prevent or delay oxidation for as long as possible [6]. This oxidation can be the result of free radicals whose production is increased during the development of many pathologies such as obesity, diabetes, atherosclerosis, cancer, bacterial and viral diseases [7-10]. Evaluation of phytotherapeutic properties, such as antibacterial and antioxidant activity is considered very important and useful, especially for plants, which are widely used in traditional medicine. Therefore, the present study aims to highlight the antioxidant capacity of the extracts of these five plants with antibacterial properties used in the treatment of bacterial infections in traditional medicine in Burkina Faso. We performed a chemical screening of the extracts from the decoction in order to characterize the main chemical compounds, particularly phenolic compounds. The analysis of the antioxidant properties of the different extracts uses three different methods.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Moisture Content

The plant material was identified by Dr. Souleymane GANABA, in charge of the Ecosystem Management and Monitoring Program of the Environment and Forest Department of the Institute of Environment and Agricultural Research (INERA-Burkina Faso). The plant material consisted of organs of the five (5) species including the leaves of Psidium guajava, the leaves of Combretum micranthum, the leaves of Eucalyptus camaldulensis, the whole plant of Euphorbia hirta and the leaves of Terminalia avicennioides. These plant parts were collected during month of March 2019 in two locations. The moisture content of the powders was obtained according to the thermogravimetric method [11].
Figure 1. Psidium guajava: (A) whole plant and (B) leaves

2.2. Extraction

The preparation of the extracts of the study consisted in carrying out an aqueous and hydro-ethanolic decoction of the various powders of the five (5) plants with 50 g of each powder in 500ml of solvent. The mixture was homogenized and boiled for 30 minutes. After cooling, the extracts were filtered and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 minutes and dry concentrated using a freeze dryer. In the case of hydroalcoholic extracts, the mixture was first concentrated on a rotavaporizer to remove the organic solvent.

2.3. Determination of the Phytochemical Constituent

The phytochemical screening was carried out according to the methods already described in the literature [12-13]. All tests were performed using chromatoplaques (60 F250, glass support 20 x 20, Fluka-Silica gel). The chemical characterization tests on chromatoplate were performed by vaporization of the different spots obtained after a thin layer separation of the constituents of the extracts with general and specific reagents: FeCl3 reagent for tannins and phenolic compounds, sulfuric vanillin reagent for sterols and terpenes, Neu reagent for flavonoids, 5% (V/V) methanolic KOH reagent for coumarins and sulfuric anisaldehyde reagent for saponosides.. The chromatographic profile of the extract samples was observed in daylight and under ultraviolet radiation (254 nm and 366 nm) before and after spraying with the different reagents.

2.4. Determination of Total Phenols

Quantitative analysis of compounds of interest concerns the most cited plant metabolites in favour of antimicrobial fight. We have therefore determined the content of phenolic compounds in general. The reference compounds used is gallic acid. The determination of the amount of total polyphenols in plant extracts uses a classical method that takes into account the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent [11]. Folin-Ciocalteu is a mixture of phosphotungstic acid and phosphomolybdic acid which is reduced during the oxidation of phenols in an alkaline medium to a mixture of blue oxides of tungsten and molybdenum. The latter have an absorption maximum at 760 nm whose intensity is proportional to the amount of polyphenols present in the sample.

2.5. Antioxidant Activity

2.5.1. ABTS Radical Reduction Test
This test is based on the oxidation-reduction mechanism of ABTS (ammonium salt of 2,2'- azino bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid). During this test the ABTS salt loses an electron to form a dark-coloured cation radical in solution. In the presence of the antioxidant agent, the radical formed is reduced to give the ABTS cation causing the solution to discolour. The method used is that described by Arts et al [14]. Briefly, the primary concentration of the samples (5mg/ml), a series of eight (08) successive dilutions was performed on a 96-well microplate. Trolox was used as reference substance. The whole was protected from light for 30 minutes at 25°C and the absorbances were read at 734 nm with the spectrophotometer.
2.5.2. DPPH Radical Reduction Test
Method for measuring the antioxidant capacity by DPPH (2,2-Diphenyl-picrylhydrazine) method is based on the ability of a compound to reduce the DPPH radical. The reduction results in a change in colour of the solution from purple to yellow in the presence of an anti-radical compound. The reaction is then quantified by measuring the absorbance of the solution by spectrophotometry at 490 nm. This test used to determine the anti-radical activity of extracts is based on the methodology developed by Takao and modified by Sombie [15]. Thus, a series of concentrations were performed from primary concentration (1mg/ml) of the samples and the trolox. On a 96-well microplate, the filling of each well for each concentration was done and deposited on a plate with 200 μL of DPPH solution (0.04mg/ml) and 20 μL of the diluted extract or reference. After 30 minutes of incubation, the absorbance was read at the wavelength of 490 nm using a spectrophotometer. The blank without sample was prepared under the same conditions and consisted of 200 μL DPPH and 20 μL ethanol. A curve of the percentage inhibition of DPPH was plotted as a function of sample concentration. On the curve, the concentration required to degrade 50% DPPH (IC50) was determined.
2.5.3. Inhibition of Lipid Peroxidation
The evaluation of lipid peroxidation was carried out by determining the substances reacting with thiobarbituric acid. The analysis is based on the formation of a pink complex in an acidic and hot environment that absorbs at 532 nm [16]. In this method 40 μL extracts (10 mg/mL) were mixed at 200μL liver homogenate in 1% Tris-HCl buffer (50Mm, pH 7.40), then 10 μL FeCl2 (0.5 mM) and 10 μL H2O2 (0.5 mM) were added. The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes, then 200μL trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (15%) and 200μL 2-thiobarbituric acid (0.67%) were added and the mixture was heated in boiling water (100°C) for 15 minutes. Absorbances were read at 532 nm using the spectrophotometer. Trolox was used as reference compound. The ability of the extracts to inhibit lipid peroxidation of the liver is expressed as a percentage inhibition.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phytochemical Analysis

Moisture content in the samples ranged from 3.84% ± 0.11 to 7.39% ± 0.08 (Table 1). High a percentage of water in a drug promotes a number of enzymatic reactions that can have negative consequences on the appearance of the drugs, their organoleptic characteristics, their therapeutic properties by degradation of the active compounds over time [11]. Thus, the content allowed in a drug for its good conservation should not exceed 10% [17]. Therefore, the moisture content of all our powders being less than 10%, suggests that our plant drugs could be preserved for a long period of time with less risk of contamination and/or alteration of the chemical principles. The different powders were extracted by aqueous and hydroalcoholic decoction. The extraction yields are reported in the table below (Table 1). In the case of the two extraction methods, the aqueous decoction gives the best yield with Euphorbia hirta and Terminalia avicennioides. The three other samples give quantitative extracts (yields > 17%) in the case of the hydroalcoholic decoction.
Table 1. Moisture content and extraction yield
     

3.2. Phytochemical Screening

Phytochemical screening by thin layer chromatography (TLC) was aimed to determine the different chemical groups involved in the antibacterial activity for the different extracts (a and b). The main research groups are listed in the table below (Table 2).
Table 2. Phytochemical Screening
     
The results obtained revealed the presence of sterols and triterpenes, phenolic compounds such as flavonoids, tannins, coumarins and saponosides in the five (5) plants extracts. Our results corroborate the data in the literature on the chemical composition of Psidium guajava [18]; Euphorbia hirta [19]. As well as those of Eucalyptus camaldulensis [20], Combretum micranthum [21] and Terminalia avicennioides [22]. The TLC revealed by Neu's flavonoid-specific reagent shows the appearance of the different colorings observed after spraying under the UV lamp at 366 nm. This presence of secondary metabolites in our extracts, would justify several of their properties distributed in biological properties and in properties of defence of the plant against the biotic and abiotic stress. Flavonoids protect plants against UV rays, bacterial and viral infections [23]. Since different chemical compounds operate synergistically according to the principle of herbal medicine, a combination of raw materials from several given plants can sometimes be more effective than each raw material used in isolation. This is the case of many antimicrobial plants, such as the "saye" a polyherbal used against malaria in Burkina Faso [17].

3.3. Total Phenols Content

Dosage of phenolic compounds is a common practice in the evaluation of the therapeutic properties of medicinal plants. Thus, the choice to quantify them among the different phytochemicals would result from the fact that these compounds possess interesting biological activities due to their presence. The content of total phenolic compounds was evaluated by the method of Folin-Cioalteu and for this purpose, we established a calibration curve from the gallic acid used as reference. The extrapolation of the content of total phenolic compounds contained in the fractions was done using the gallic acid curve equation. The results obtained are expressed in milligram Gallic Acid equivalent /100g extract (mgGAE/100g) and are shown in the table and figure below (Table 3; figure 2). The highest content was obtained with Psidium guajava (233.24 ± 2.803mg GAE/g) for the aqueous extracts. For the hydroalcoholic extracts, the contents are high for all the extracts (> 130 mg GAE/g). the highest contents for these extracts are obtained particularly with Psidium guajava (209.48 ± 5.38 mg GAE/g) and Terminalia avicennioides (223.16 ± 3.93 mg GAE/g). These levels show that our plants are rich in phenolic compounds. These results are in line with studies already realized on the antioxidant properties of Psidium guajava leaves which would be linked to the high content of phenolic compounds in the tested extracts. These properties could justify the beneficial effects of diabetisane based on Psidium guajava leaves in the prevention of diabetes and its degenerative complications. In addition, polyphenols are known for their antioxidant capacity [25].
Table 3. Total phenol content
     
Figure 2. Dosage of total phenolic compounds

3.4. Antioxidant Activity

3.4.1. Determination of Antiradical Activity
The positive (+) test is indicated on the plate as a luminous area on a purple background (figure 3). This explains the reaction between the DPPH reagent and the compounds present in the extracts. This reaction shows that the extracts contain phytocompounds that can trap free radicals [26]. All the extracts submitted to this test gave a positive result, which explains the antioxidant properties of the different extracts. By superimposing the chromatographic profiles of the phytochemical screening and those of the antiradical activity, it is possible to establish the correspondence between the active zones and the identified phytocompounds.
Table 4. Anti-radical test
     
Figure 3. Anti-radical test using TLC plate
3.4.2. ABTS and DPPH Methods
The evaluation of the antioxidant activity by the ABTS and DPPH methods was determined from the different IC50s, i.e. the concentration of the extract/fraction likely to cause a 50% inhibition. The results are presented in the table below (Table 5).
Table 5. Antioxidant capacity of extracts by the ABTS and DPPH method
     
Concerning the ABTS test, for both extracts a and b, there is no significant difference between the values. The highest values are obtained with Psidium guajava in the case of aqueous decocation (IC50: 10.99 ± 0.28 µg/mL) and Terminalia avicennioides in the case of hydroalcoholic decocation (IC50: 11.09 ± 0.22 µg/mL). These values are significant compared to the reference compound (trolox: IC50: 4.37 µg/mL). In the literature, investigations on extracts of these plants, including Psidium guajava leaves, have reported a strong potential for inhibition of the ABTS radical in the hydro-ethanol extract [27]. These results indicate the presence of the compounds of interest and the ability of the extracts to eliminate free radicals and reactive forms of oxygen. The analysis of the antioxidant activity by the DPPH method resulted in IC50 ranging from 4.54 ± 2.4 μg/mL (Euphorbia hirta) to 8.64 ± 0.09 μg/mL (Terminalia avicennioides) with the extracts of the aqueous decoction, 7.10 ± 0.38μg/mL (Psidium guajava) to 9.06 ± 0.13μg/mL (Terminalia avicennioides) with the extracts of the hydroalcoholic decoction. All the extracts present an antioxidant activity with a strong potential of reduction of the DPPH radical observed with the extract of Psidium guajava and Euphorbia hirta.
3.4.3. Inhibition of Lipid Peroxidation
The results of the inhibition of lipid peroxidation of the liver are presented in the table below (Table 6).
Table 6. Lipid Peroxidation Antioxidant Test
     
The results of the inhibition of lipid peroxidation (LPO) in the liver ranged from 40.23 ± 0.47% (Psidium guajava) to 18.10 ± 0.59% (Euphorbia hirta) for the aqueous decoction, 38.16 ± 0.67% (Psidium guajava) to 27.16 ± 0.23% (Combretum micranthum) for the extracts from the hydroalcoholic decoction. Thus, the strong lipid peroxidation inhibition potentials were obtained with aqueous and hydroalcoholic decocted extracts of Psidium guajava (38.16 ± 0.67%; 40.23 ± 0.47%), aqueous and hydroalcoholic extracts of Terminalia avicennioides (27.50 ± 0.52%; 31.13 ± 0.52%). For all the extracts the percentages of inhibition are significant although relatively low compared to that of the reference compound (trolox) which is 75.82 ± 0.84. As the liver is the main organ of drug metabolism, these results suggest that these extracts could potentially play a protective role for the liver by preventing damage caused by oxidative stress.
Figure 4. Results of the inhibition test of lipid peroxidation

4. Conclusions

This study allowed us to qualitatively analyze the presence of compounds of interest such as phenolic compounds. The extracts each present an antioxidant activity with varying antioxidant capacity Among the five plants, Psidium guajava extracts have the highest content of total phenolic compounds and also show the highest antioxidant activity according to different tests. For a possible association of these plants, it would be more beneficial to take into account the presence of psiduim guajava. As a perspective, we plan to study some associations, especially those already made by the populations with an inclusion of psidium guajava. Since the chemical profiles are already known, we will test the antioxidant power and antibacterial properties of the combinations that will be developed.

References

[1]  Cantóna R., Horcajada J. P., Oliver A., Garbajosa P.R. and Vila J. Inappropriate use of antibiotics in hospitals: The complex relationship between antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2013, 31 (Supl 4): 3-11.
[2]  Plandey A.K., Kamur S. Perspective on Plant Products as Antimicrobials Agents: A Review. Pharmacologia 2013, 4 (7): 469-480.
[3]  Wright G.D., Sutherland A.D. New strategies for combating multi-drug-resistant bacteria. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2007, 13(6): 260-7.
[4]  Adedapo A.A., Jimoh F.O., Koduru S. et al. Antibacterial and antioxidant properties of the methanol extracts of the leaves and stems of Calpurnia aurea. BMC Complement Altern. Med. 2008 8, 53.
[5]  Hendra R., Ahmad S., Sukari A., Shukor M. Y. Oskoueian E. Flavonoid analyses and antimicrobial activity of various parts of Phaleria macrocarpa Scheff. Boerl fruit. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 3422-3431.
[6]  Al-Laith A. Antioxidant components and antioxidant / antiradical activities of desert truffle (Tirmania nivea) from various Middle Eastern origins. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2010, 23(1): 15-22.
[7]  Codoñer-Franch P., Valls-Bellés V., Arilla Codoñer A., Alonso-Iglesias E. Oxidant mechanisms in childhood obesity: the link between inflammation and oxidative stress. Translational Res. 2011, 158(6): 369-384.
[8]  Rashid K., Sinha K., Sil P.C. An update on oxidative stress-mediated organ pathophysiology. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 62, 584-600.
[9]  Sarr S.O., Fall A.D., Gueye R., Diop A., Diatta K., Diop N., Ndiaye B., Diop Y.M. Etude de l’activité antioxydante des extraits des feuilles de Vitex Doniana (Verbenaceae). Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2015, 9(3): 1263-1269.
[10]  Agboola O.S. Antioxidant potentials of local fruits and foreign wines sold in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2014. 8(2): 699-704.
[11]  Ouedraogo B., Yoda J., Kini F., Ouedraogo J.C., Lompo M., Ouedraogo S. Research of Bioactive Chemical Markers in Trunk Bark Extracts of Anogeissus leiocarpa, a Traditional Herbal Remedy for Hypertension. American Journal of Applied Chemistry 2020, 8(1): 6-12.
[12]  Békro, Y.A., Békro, M.J.A., Boua, B.B., TraBi, F.H. et Ehile, E.E. 2007. Étude ethnobotanique et screening phytochimique de Caesalpinia benthamiana (Baill.) Herend et Zarucchi (Caesalpiniaceae). Sciences et Nature, 4: 217-225.
[13]  Mamyrbékova-Békro, J.A., Konan, M.K., Békro, Y.A., Djié Bi, M.G., Zomi Bi, T.J., Mambo, V., Boua, B.B. 2008. Phytocompounds of the extracts of four medicinal plants of Côte d’Ivoire and assessment of their potential antioxidant by thin layer chromatography. European Journal of scientific Research, 24(2): 219-228.
[14]  Arts, Mariken J. T. J., Sebastiaan Dallinga, J., Voss, Hans-Peter, Haenen, Guido R. M. M., & Bast, Aalt. A new approach to assess the total antioxidant capacity using the TEAC assay. Food Chemistry 2004, 88(4): 567-570.
[15]  Sombié, P.E.A.D., Hilou, A., Coulibaly, A.Y., Tibiri, A., Kiendrebeogo, M. & Nacoulma O.G. (2011). Brain Protective And Erythrocytes Hemolysis Inhibition Potencials From Galls Of Guiera Senegalensis Gmel (Combretaceae). Journal Of Pharmacology And Toxicology, 6 (4), 361-370.
[16]  K. Ohkawa, H., Onishi, N. & Yagi, “Assay for lipid peroxidation in animal tissue by thiobarbituric acid reaction.,” Anal. Biochem., vol. 95, p. 351–358., 1979.
[17]  Yoda J., Ouedraogo J.C., Ouedraogo S., Traore-Coulibaly1 M., Kini F., Lompo M., Ouedraogo S. Standardisation Process of Saye, a Traditional Polyherbal Formulation Remedy for Malaria: Physico-chemical Analysis and Phytochemical Investigation. Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry 2020, 8(1): 33-40.
[18]  Camarena-Tello, J. Quantification of Phenolic Compounds and In Vitro Radical Scavenging Abilities with Leaf Extracts from Two Varieties of Psidium guajava L. Antioxidants 2018, 7 (3): 34.
[19]  Chitra V.M., Sasikumar D., Awdah Masoud Al-hazimi, Screening of Phytochemical and In vitro activity of Euphorbia hirta L. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 2011, 3(6): 110-114.
[20]  Fadel H., Marx F., El-Sawy A. et al. Effect of extraction techniques on the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. brevirostris leaf oils. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 1999, 208, 212–216.
[21]  Gbaguidi N. L.. Évaluation de l’activité antioxydante du mélange des extraits de feuilles de vitex doniana et de combretum micranthum (G. Don), thèse de doctorat en pharmacie (Dakar) N° 202, 2016.
[22]  Mor SOW. Fractionnement et mise en évidence des propriétés anti-oxydantes d’un extrait hydro-alcoolique de feuilles de Terminalia avicennioides. Thèse de doctorat en pharmacie Dakar, 2015; N° 90.
[23]  Wachter A. G., Hoffmann J.J., Furbacher T., Blake M. E., Timmermanna N.B. Antibacterial and antifungal flavanones from Eysenhardtia texana. Phytochem 1999, 52, 1469-1471.
[24]  Braca A., Tommasi N., Bari L. et al. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Phenolic Compounds from Wild and Cultivated Sclerocarya birrea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51(23): 6689-95.
[25]  Camarena-Tello J., Martínez-Flores H., Garnica-Romo M. et al. Quantification of Phenolic Compounds and In Vitro Radical Scavenging Abilities with Leaf Extracts from Two Varieties of Psidium guajava L. Antioxidants 2018, 7(3), 34.
[26]  Takao T., Kitatami F., Watanabe N., Yagi A. & Sakata K. A simple screening method for antioxydants and isolation of several antioxydants produced by marine bacteria from fish and shell fish. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 1994 58, 1780-1783.
[27]  A. Kandalkar, A.P., S.Darade and D. Baviskar, Free radical scavenging activity of Euphorbia hirta L. leaves and isolation of active flavonoids Myricitrin. Asian J. pharmaceu. Clin Res, 2010. 3(3): pp. 234-237.