Journal of Civil Engineering Research

p-ISSN: 2163-2316    e-ISSN: 2163-2340

2014;  4(3A): 173-177

doi:10.5923/c.jce.201402.30

Effect of Repeated Earthquakes on the School Building in Northern Sumatra

Ade Faisal, Tondi Amirsyah Putera

Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara (UMSU), Medan, Indonesia

Correspondence to: Ade Faisal, Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara (UMSU), Medan, Indonesia.

Email:

Copyright © 2014 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

The earthquakes struck a region near the active fault for many times. The yielded structures after an earthquake might become excessive damages after experiencing another earthquake. The concept of seismic design of building has not consider this type of hazard. Recent studies indicate that the effect of repeated earthquake is significantly occurred on the moment resisting bare frames, either made from steel or concrete material. This paper investigates the effect of repeated earthquake on the frames with infilled brick wall. The frames represent school building built on the regions near the Sumatran active fault, Indonesia. The result shows that the sequence of plastic hinges occur on the structures model after experiencing the repeated earthquake. It starts from the brick wall and then spreads to the columns and beams. For the single earthquakes, the brick wall of structures model tends to perform damage, but few of columns and beams experiences hinges. These conclude that the future repeated earthquake can not be underestimated.

Keywords: Nonlinear inelastic analysis, School building, Repeated earthquakes, Sumatra

Cite this paper: Ade Faisal, Tondi Amirsyah Putera, Effect of Repeated Earthquakes on the School Building in Northern Sumatra, Journal of Civil Engineering Research, Vol. 4 No. 3A, 2014, pp. 173-177. doi: 10.5923/c.jce.201402.30.

1. Introduction

There are few studies have examined the effect of seismic repetitions on the buildings. Elnashai et al. [1] has predicted that the multiple earthquake ground motions can give ductility demand required significantly higher than that required by a single event. Continuous reduction in the lateral stiffness was also detected on a building built on soft soil having several low magnitude earthquake ground motions [2]. Amadio et al. [3] indicates that repeated earthquakes can imply a considerable accumulation of damage and a consequent reduction in the force reduction factor.
Hatzigeorgiou and Beskos [4] runs million nonlinear time history analyses on the elasto-plastic SDOF system with strain hardening and empirically introduced an expression to estimate the inelastic displacement ratio (defined as the ratio of maximum inelastic displacement and maximum elastic displacement) on the flexural-based RC and steel structures based on period of vibration, force reduction factor, site conditions, post-yield stiffness, and damping. It concludes that repeated earthquakes require increased displacement demands in comparison with single seismic events as in design earthquake. They find the inelastic displacement ratio for all SDOF systems built at all soil types generally appear to be increased 2 times or more with respect to that obtained for the corresponding single earthquakes.
Faisal et al. [5] have studied three-dimensional moment resisting frame under bi-directional seismic excitation. It explains that the story ductility demand of low-story reinforced concrete buildings are significantly affected by repeated earthquakes. It finds that as the force reduction factor decreases the effect of repeated earthquake is decreases. The effect could be neglected when the structures have force reduction factor of less than two. The upper level of the short structure tends to have the maximum demand when experiencing repeated earthquakes.
The aforementioned studies explore the bare moment resisting frame in two-dimensional and three-dimensional structural model under repeated earthquakes. Actually, most of reinforced concrete frame buildings have the infilled-wall in order to separating the space. Therefore this paper discusses the effect of repeated earthquakes on the single story buildings having infilled brick wall. The school buildings in the surrounding Sumatran fault are selected to be the model of single story buildings. This study observes the plastic hinge on the school building structures under the sequence of seismic motion.

2. Methodology

2.1. School Building Survey

The study surveys 8 school buildings situated in the cities near the Sumatran active fault. Table 1 shows the surveyed buildings, which are placed in 6 cities. All of the surveyed buildings are single story reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, which are consist of old and new buildings. Fig. 1 shows the example of surveyed building in Balige, which is the junior high school managed by the local government. Mostly, the old building is arranged in one block, whereas the other blocks are the new buildings. For the sake of simplicity in the modelling of structure, the term new in this case is represent the buildings that were built after the year of 2000. It is meant that the study assumed the surveyed buildings were designed in accordance with the building code released within this years.
Table 1. The school buildings considered in this study
Figure 1. The junior high school in Balige
During the field survey, the geometry of the school building is measured using laser meter and the strength of concrete material of the element is investigated using the rebound Hammer apparatus. The diameter and number of steel bar is identified visually. If this method is not possible to be done in the field, the number and diameter of rebar are assumed to be equal to the minimum requirement in the reinforced concrete design. It is done so because the as-built drawings are not available in the school office during the field survey.

2.2. Modeling of the School Building Structures

The junior high school building in Balige is used as an example in this study. The building has 2 class rooms with geometry dimension 8 x 7 m of each, as shown in Fig. 1a. This school building structures are modeled as the 3-dimensional moment resisting frames with infilled brick wall. The infilled brick wall is modeled as the strut-tie element or compressional member (Fig. 2a). The strength of infilled brick wall is assumed to be 3,54 MPa and its elastic moduli is 1000 MPa. The thickness of brick wall is assumed to be 10 cm. These values are based on the test done by Aryanto [6]. Therefore the equivalent depth and the ultimate normal strength of brick wall are found to be 0,79 m and 470 kN, respectively. For the infilled brick wall with opening, this study uses the reduction factor to introduce to the ultimate strength of the brick wall.
Figure 2. The structural model of school building: a) 3-D model of moment resisting frame with bracing to represent wall, and b) the backbone curve to represent the nonlinear material behavior of RC elements
The plastic hinge in the column and beam element is represented by moment-rotation relationship modelled using lumped plasticity model. To simulate the cyclic behavior of RC members in plastic hinge under load reversals, Modified-Takeda hysteresis rule is employed (Fig. 2b) with the unloading and reloading parameters (α = 0.3 and β = 0.6) for beam and column member are identical, as suggested by Fardis [7]. The backbone curve proposed by Zaerian and Krawinkler [8] is used, as demonstrated by thin line in Fig. 4. The yield rotation, θy, of a member is obtained by the ratio of My to elastic rotation stiffness (K0=6EI/L). The cyclic strength degradation could increase the peak displacement demands significantly, particularly for short period of structures. The peak displacement demands are very sensitive to the changes of yield strength [9]. Therefore, this study considers the strength degradation of the member based on rotation ductility from Zareian and Krawinkler [8] backbone curve, which is developed based on hysteresis rule of Ibarra et al [10].

2.3. Modeling of the Repeated Earthquakes Ground Motions

The ground motion record is taken from PEER—NGA database and all motions are near fault motion type, as listed in Table 2 and shown in Fig. 3. It is not possible to find the identical seismological parameter as in Sumatran fault earthquake in searching the ground motion record in the database. Therefore, the selection is made only based on the shallow crustal earthquakes on the stiff soil. These selected ground motions are scaled to the design spectra in Indonesian Seismic Code (SNI 1726:2012) [11] based on its response spectrum at the building’s fundamental period.
Table 2. List of earthquake ground motions used in this study
Figure 3. Near-fault ground motion model: a) major and minor components, b) double events motion model
The repeated earthquake ground motion presents in the form of the combination of ground motion with single and double events (Fig. 3). The method of assembly is taken from Hatzigeorgiou and Beskos [4]. In this method, the amplitude ratio of assembled ground motion is scaled based on the ratio of peak ground acceleration (PGA), which is governed by magnitude within a consecutive earthquakes sourced from the same seismic region and recorded at the same site. The ratio of PGA is derived using the ratio of empirical attenuation functions, which varied in magnitude. Moreover, an interval motion with zero acceleration of amplitude and 100 seconds of duration length inserts in between two consecutive ground motions [12].

3. Result and Discussion

The model of school building has fundamental period of 0.12 s and 0.11 s for strong and weak directions, respectively. This short period is typical for short structures and would be sensitive to the high frequency ground motion (e.g. near fault ground motion). The result of linear analysis indicates that the school building structures without infilled wall have a poor lateral strength. This strength is significantly increased when the infilled is taking into account in the analysis.
The pushover analysis indicates that the yield deformation of school building model achieves 5.4 cm. The result of nonlinear inelastic response history analysis in form of displacement is listed in Table 3 and 4. These tables explain that the lateral deformation demand significantly increases of up to 24,4% due to repeated earthquakes (double event). It means that the cracked element after a single event of earthquake could be excessively damaged when experiencing the double event of earthquakes.
Table 3. Displacement and ductility demands of the school building in Balige under single event of earthquake
     
Table 4. Displacement and ductility demands of the school building in Balige under repeated earthquake
     
It shows that the single event of earthquake makes some of the infilled brick walls damage and few columns and beams experience plastic hinge. This condition is almost similar for 3 type of selected ground motions. The number of structural elements experiencing plastic hinge are increased after the second event motion occurred (repeated earthquake case). In this case, all of the infilled brick walls are damaged and plastic hinges are indicated on the most of columns. The increment of damage condition is quite significant, which is indicating the school building is sensitive to the repeated ground motion. The short period of ground motion is most probably has an important role in damaging the short period building. Therefore, a proper design code is needed for constructing the single story building near the Sumatran fault, particularly in detailing the rebar of column and beam elements.

4. Conclusions

This study investigates the deformation and damage of the single story school building near the Sumatran fault under the repeated ground motions. The result concludes that the repeated earthquake can increase the ductility demand of the school building built on the stiff soil of up to 24.4%. The damage after the repeated ground motion is found to be significantly increased in comparison with the damage due to single event of earthquakes. All of the infilled brick wall and the beam element are found to be totally damage after experiencing the repeated ground motions. Plastic hinges are exhibited in the most of column due to the double event of earthquakes, whereas only few of columns are experienced it when the single event of earthquake occurred. In order to avoid any casualties, the repeated earthquake shall be considered in Indonesian seismic code.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research is fully funded by Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of Education and Culture, through the Penelitian Desentralisasi Hibah Bersaing under the contract with no. 70/II.3-AU/UMSU-P3M/C/2014. This support is much appreciated.

References

[1]  A.S. Elnashai, J.J. Bommer, and A. Martinez-Pereira. Engineering implications of strong-motion records from recent earthquakes. Proceeding of the 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 1998.
[2]  D. Muria Vila, and A.M. Toro Jaramillo. Effects of several events recorded at a building founded on soft soil. Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris, 1998.
[3]  C. Amadio, M. Fragiacomo, S. Rajgelj. The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non linear response of SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32(2):291-308.
[4]  G.D. Hatzigeorgiou, and D.E. Beskos. Inelastic displacement ratios for SDOF structures subjected to repeated earthquakes. Engineering Structures. 2009; 31(11):2744-2755.
[5]  A. Faisal, T.A. Majid, G.D. Hatzigeorgiou. Investigation of story ductility demands of inelastic concrete frames subjected to repeated earthquakes. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering. 2013; 44(1):42 -53.
[6]  A. Aryanto. Kinerja portal beton bertulang dengan dinding pengisi bata ringan terhadap beban gempa. Tesis Magister, Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2008.
[7]  M.N. Fardis. Seismic design, assessment and retrofitting of concrete buildings: based on EN-Eurocode 8 (Vol. 8). New York: Springer. 2009.
[8]  F. Zareian, H. Krawinkler. Simplified performance-based earthquake engineering. Report No. 169, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, 2009.
[9]  Applied Technology Council (ATC). Effects of strength and stiffness degradation on the seismic response of structural systems, Report No. FEMA P440A, Washington, DC, 2009.
[10]  L. Ibarra, and H. Krawinkler. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Report No. 2005/06, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2005.
[11]  Badan Standardisasi Indonesia. Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan non gedung. Jakarta. 2012.
[12]  G.D. Hatzigeorgiou. Ductility demand spectra for multiple near- and far-fault earthquakes. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering. 2010; 30(4):170-183.