American Journal of Economics

p-ISSN: 2166-4951    e-ISSN: 2166-496X

2013;  3(C): 143-149

doi:10.5923/c.economics.201301.24

A Review of Website Quality Framework for Low Cost Carrier

Zainab Khalifah, Chiet Bing Wong, Noor Hazarina Hashim

Department of Business Administration, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, 81300, Malaysia

Correspondence to: Chiet Bing Wong, Department of Business Administration, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, 81300, Malaysia.

Email:

Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

The current trend in travel witnessed, travelers prefer to book their flight ticket online. As such, a good website design for an airline company is essential. Based on review of service quality and website design studies, this study proposes a framework for a low cost carrier website. The framework includes five dimensions for a low cost airline website such as content information, navigation, responsiveness, personalization, and security and privacy. This paper concludes with the framework as contribution to both academic and practical aspects.

Keywords: Website Quality, Low Cost Carrier, Evaluation Instrument

Cite this paper: Zainab Khalifah, Chiet Bing Wong, Noor Hazarina Hashim, A Review of Website Quality Framework for Low Cost Carrier, American Journal of Economics, Vol. 3 No. C, 2013, pp. 143-149. doi: 10.5923/c.economics.201301.24.

1. Introduction

The emergence of Internet technology in the late 1990 has witnessed, website as an imperative tool in online transaction. For the airline industry, ticket has become the main source of the revenue, which is projected to grow about 40 percent from $48 billion in 2008 to $68 billion in 2014[1]. In Asia Pacific, the online booking of low cost carrier is expected to reach US$ 13.3 billion in 2013, increasing 55 percent over 2011[2].
Impression about a website occurred once a customer visited the website. Since website is a connection tools between customers and company, a quality website is important[3].
Studies in electronic commerce have investigated the application of website in retail, auction, bookstore, banking, travel and tourism, government transactions and other. Nonetheless, different service quality variables are applied in different online business settings. Studies found that different shopping environment utilize different dimensions to measure service quality[4]. Most researchers proposed their model or scale to measure online service quality ([5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11]).
Most researches evaluate airline’s overall service quality in terms of in-flight service, pre-flight service, post-flight service, airport services, flight schedule, counter services, staff performance, price, and back-office operations. Such related studies had been conducted in common airlines ([12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17]) and specifically in low cost airline ([4],[7],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22]). Yet, few researchers study airline industry in terms of e-service quality[24],[25], [26],[27],[28],[29]. Bukhari et al.[29] mentioned that there is little research into website evaluation particularly on airline industry. While these studies have investigated the website quality, it did not link with online motivation (utilitarian and hedonic motivation). Shopping motivation happened as there are a reasons or need for customers to go shopping[30]. Thus, the specific motivation while customer shopping in different sector website will largely vary due to inherent customer needs. For example, utilitarian motive were identified as the key reasons for customers to book travel online ([31],[32]). Nusair and Kandampully[33] suggested to examine shopping motivation (utilitarian/hedonic) of different travel industries to develop and verify the dimensions of web quality. Based on these motivations, it can identify the relevant dimensions required for online low cost carrier website.
As there are no common agreed upon standards for website evaluation in existing tourism literature[34], it is crucial to review and adapt existing dimensions from different aspect to form an accurate and valid quality measurement for websites particularly for low cost carrier. The next section will discuss the literature review on related topics, followed by methodology of this study. The paper ends up with a summary of the study and research contributions.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Website Quality

Table 1. List of Variables Investigated in Travel and Tourism Studies
     
Within the academic literature, website quality is recognized as a significant factor to drive e-business[35]. As such, continuous website improvement is necessary to attract new and retain existing online consumers[36]. In the past, several scales were established by prior researchers to measure the quality of website in travel and tourism industry and they defined over these dimensions. However, most dimensions or constructs developed by earlier researches are overlapping between models from different fields[29]. Among the dimension proposed by website quality models, some dimensions with similar meaning are named differently; even some dimensions with different meaning are treated as same dimension. Bukhari et al.[29] had collect and list the variables of web quality model that investigated in earlier studies, specifically in the travel and tourism industry. They had been formed several dimensions (ease of use, usability/usefulness, trust, responsiveness, information quality, system quality, availability, interactivity, enjoyment, personalization, customer service, compensation, and fulfilment), to categorise each collected variables from previous studies. However, the total count stated are not enough since there are some studies regarding customer behaviour and web service quality within travel and tourism not mentioned. Thus, this study had analysed and categorised each dimensions with similar meaning from previous studies, to re-count the occurrence for each of them. In order to enhance the accuracy of variable, Table 1 had been constructed to extend and add-on other variables of website quality within travel and tourism industries that are not mentioned by Bukhari et al.[29].
As a result, the observation is consistent with the Bukhari et al.[29] studies, who found out that Ease of use, Usability/Usefulness, Responsiveness, Information Quality, System Quality, and Trust (Privacy/Security) are significant dimensions that are most utilized by previous research in travel and tourism service settings. Meanwhile, Personalization is added as one of the significant dimensions in this observation.

2.2. E-Service Quality Scale Models

Table 2 shows models used by previous researchers to assess web service quality.
Table 2. Summary of E-Service Quality Measurement Scale
Model /scaleAuthor(s)Service Setting
SERVQUAL[43]Offline environment
E-SERVQUAL[11]Product variety (online environment)
E-QUAL[37]Travel and tourism
SITEQUAL[10]Internet shopping site
WebQual[6]Online bookstore
PIRQUAL[5]Internet retailing
eTailQ[9]Online retailing
NetQual[44]Travel & electronic goods
E-Satisfaction model[8]Online retailing
While different models proposed to evaluate web service quality in each service setting, the E-QUAL scale is applied in travel and tourism industry. Based on SERVQUAL scale, Kaynama and Black[37] has been proposed seven dimensions including content, accessibility, navigation, design/presentation, responsiveness/feedback, background information, and personalization/customization for online travel agencies. Table 3 shows some researchers deployed E-QUAL scale within the travel and tourism industry ([37], [40],[38]).
Ho and Lee[38] mentioned that the content of E-QUAL scale constructs were ambiguous and brief. Moreover, since the existing studies which utilise E-QUAL scale evaluate website quality only in common travel and tourism service setting, it is crucial for this study to extend the application of E-QUAL framework, in order to deploy it in airline context, specifically in low cost carrier.
Table 3. E-QUAL Scale Proposed and Adapted by Past Researchers
     

2.3. Airline Website Quality Evaluation Instrument

There are several evaluation instruments, tools, and index been developed specifically for airline industry. The existed instruments were utilized to evaluate the quality of airline website over different countries. There are PAWQI, ASEF, AWAI and AWET as stated in Table 4.
Table 4. Overview of Airline Website Quality Evaluation Instrument
Author / YearEvaluation InstrumentDimensionRegion
[24]PAWQI (Perceived Airline Website Quality Instrument)Site Quality, Information Quality, Interaction Quality, and Airline-Specific QualityNew Zealand
[45]AWET (Airline Website Evaluation Tool)Interface and Design, Navigation, Content, Usability, Reservation Process, Customer Support, and Technical aspectWorldwide (American, European, Israel, and Canadian)
[46]ASEF (Airline Site Evaluation Framework)Site Finding, Interface, Navigation, Content, Reliability and Technical aspectWorldwide (European, Asian, American, Oceania)
[47]AWAI (Airline Website assessment Index)Transactional Content, Informational Content, Website Design and Passenger Enjoyment SupportArabian Country
[48]AWAI (Airline Website Assessment Index) – adopted and modifiedInformational Content, Passenger Enjoyment/Support, Transactional. Content, and Website DesignMiddle East

2.4. Online Motivation Orientation

Engagement of online retailing or shopping involve of two motivations: utilitarian motivation orientation and hedonic motivation orientation. Customer who motivated by utilitarian preferred purchasing products or services through an efficient and timely manner way to achieve their goals with minimum irritation[49] while customer motivated by hedonic tend to search for enjoyment and happiness[50]. Since most of the customers who shop online had specific planned purchase in mind, they are treated as customer with utilitarian motivation[9]. Utilitarian oriented customers are most likely to have more direct search intention and purchase intention, as stated by Tsao and Chang[51]. Basically, traveller is associated with utilitarian motive while using website to book flight ticket for their personal needs, they prefer to complete their booking quickly without delay. The motivation while customer shopping in different sector website will largely varies due to inherent customer needs. Customers doing online booking such as travel, airline, hotel, and event tickets, is an example of utilitarian motivation ([31],[32]), since most of this booking are with objective and defined motives. At this point, entertainment becomes less important than fare tickets through a convenience, effective, and efficient website.

3. Methodology

The website quality dimensions of this study were adapted and modified based on E-QUAL scale proposed by Kaynama and Black[37]. The E-QUAL scale was adapted in this study because it is developed to measure dimensions of website quality and customer satisfaction in travel and tourism industry, which are similar to airline industry. As mentioned by[37], there are similarity of travel sites in the types of additional information and service they provide, due to these sites have become homogenous in terms of offering online reservations for hotel, airline, and cars. However, the other scales and models are not selected due to irrelevant business context. To design the dimensions of E-QUAL scale for airline industry, several criteria need to be considered.
First, evaluation instruments of airline website service (PAWQI, ASEF, AWAI, and AWET) will be adopted, since there were constructed to evaluate the website quality over airline industries, which had familiar context with this study. This study analyses and categories each similar dimensions of these instruments into specific dimension group, by identifying various dimensions and factors with similar meaning.
Several major dimensions over four airline website evaluation tools was created, such as Site Quality, Information Content and Quality, Interaction Quality, Airline-specific Quality, Interface and Design, Navigation, Usability, Reservation Process, Customer Support, Technical Aspect, Transactional Content, Website Design, and Passenger Enjoyment/Support.
Table 5 shows the adaptation of website quality dimensions, which the outcome of studies (Table 4) are reviewed and categorised, then fit into E-QUAL scale for verification.
Table 5. Adaptation of Website Quality Dimensions (Part 1)
     
Table 6. Adaptation of Website Quality Dimensions (Part 2)
     
Within these major dimensions created, Information Content and Quality consists of Information Quality[24], Content ([45],[46]), and Informational Content ([47],[48]). Interaction Quality derived from Interaction Quality[24], and Reliability[46]. Interface and Design consists of Interface and Design[45], and Interface[46]. Website Design formed over Website Design ([47],[48]) and Site Finding [47].
However, some of the created dimensions keep the same label with original dimension, such as Site Quality[24], Airline-specific Quality[24], Navigation ([45],[46]), Usability[45], Reservation Process[45], Customer Suppor t[45], Technical Aspect[45],[46]), Transactional Content ([47],[48]), Passenger Enjoyment Support ([47],[48]).
Next, as noted in 2.1, previous studies found and agreed that Ease of use, Usability/Usefulness, Responsiveness, Information Quality, System Quality, Personalization, and Trust (Privacy/Security) are dimensions which is most significant for web service quality within travel and tourism. These dimensions fit into the E-QUAL scale to verify each dimension as shown in Table 6.
In addition, as mentioned in 2.4, online airline booking is a part of online shopping therefore online bookers are most likely to have utilitarian motive toward online booking. Since utilitarian motive identified as a main reason for customer to makes flight reservation in airline website ([31],[32]), the value of utilitarian motivation may verify the feature required in website for low cost carrier. This study collects and categorises each value of utilitarian motivation, which related to airline’s website service. The utilitarian motivation value will be adapted with the E-QUAL scale, in order to verify and support each dimensions proposed. However, the value of hedonic motivation will be identified and utilised as a reference, to remove the proposed dimensions in E-QUAL scale that are related to hedonic dimension, since the users of airline website are less likely to have hedonic motive.
After analysis, values of online motivation are recognised and allocated into two parts, which are Utilitarian motive and Hedonic motive. The resulted utilitarian motivation value which are adapted with E-QUAL scale in order to verify and support each dimensions proposed as shown in Table 6, are Convenience ([52],[53],[54],[50],[55],[56]), Accuracy and Comprehensive Information ([50],[32]), Price[54], Easy to Use ([32],[54]), Compatibility ([55],[56]), Website Design and Functionality[57], Immediacy and Rich Information ([52],[53]), Information Quality[57], Security and Privacy [57], and Responsiveness[57],
Values of hedonic motivation which utilised as a reference to remove the proposed dimensions in E-QUAL scale are Enjoyment ([58],[59],[60],[50],[61]), Happiness[58],Pleasure ([62],[57]), Visual Appealing[63], and Entertainment ([57],[50]).
As a result, four of E-QUAL scale dimensions were selected such as content information, navigation, responsiveness, and personalization. Whereas, another three of the E-QUAL scale dimensions were neglected due to previous researchers do not consider the accessibility and background information as the significant dimensions to measure the website quality of travel and tourism service or even in airline context, while design presentation neglected, since the users of airline website are less likely to have hedonic motive but usually have utilitarian motive (purchase plan in mind). Basically, customers do not mind any enjoyment or entertainment in the website design of low cost airline, as long as they can grab cheap fare tickets in short time and less effort. Additional dimension which called “security and privacy” is included into this study as there are supported evidences from previous studies. Since online flight reservation requires personal and bank information in transaction process, it leads to high concern of customers toward the security level when providing sensitive information online, especially when there are widespread reports of malicious attacks in websites’ security system. Table 7 shows the five dimensions of website quality proposed in this study.
Table 7. Proposed Dimensions of Website Quality for Low Cost Carrier
     

4. Conclusions

This paper review and reformulate the key dimension of website quality for airline industry, particularly in low cost carrier based on prior literature. The depth review can be referred by future research to enhance the validity of the outcomes for similar research subject. The proposed dimensions can be applied to evaluate airline’s website quality, in order to improve their website performance. It is essential as better quality of website help build good customer relationship and high satisfaction.

References

[1]  eMarketer, “Asia-Pacific is to lead the world in online sales by 2013”, Retrieved on 27 December 2012 from http://www.newmediatrendwatch.com/news/1089-asia-pacific-is-to-lead-the-world-in-online-sales-by-2013.
[2]  Phocuswright, “Low-Cost Carrier Lead Airline Market Growth in Asia Pacific”,http://www.phocuswright.com/research_updates/low-cost-carriers-lead-airline-market-growth-in-asia-pacific, 2012.
[3]  H. Haghtalab, Z. G. Tarzeh, and T. Nabizadeh, “Investigating the Effects of Electronic Satisfaction Factors on Forming Electronic Satisfaction of Website Services in Tourism Industry”, Research Journal of Recent Sciences, Vol. 1 (11), 2012, pp.1-8.
[4]  M. M. Bozorgi, “Measuring Service Quality of the Airline using SERVQUAL model”, Lulea Univ. Technology, 2006.
[5]  J. E. Francis, and L. White, “PIRQUAL: A Scale for Measuring Customer Expectations and Perceptions of Quality in Internet Retailing”, Proceedings of the 2002 American Marketing Association Winter Educators’ Conference: Marketing Theory and Applications, Vol. 13, 2002, pp.263-270.
[6]  E. T. Loiacono, R. T. Watson, and D. L. Goodhue, “WEBQUAL: A Measure of Website Quality”, 2002 Marketing educators’ conference: Marketing theory and applications, Vol. 13, 2002, pp. 432–437.
[7]  L. C. Schaupp, and F. Belanger, “A Conjoint Analysis of Online Consumer Satisfaction”, Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol.6 (2), 2005, pp.95-111.
[8]  D. M. Szymanski, and R. T. Hise, “E-satisfaction: An Initial Examination”, Journal of Retailing, Vol.76 (3), 2000, pp.309–322.
[9]  M. Wolfinbarger, and M. Gilly, “Etailq: Dimensionalizing, Measuring and Predicting Etail Quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol.79, issue.3, 2003, pp.183-198.
[10]  B. Yoo, and N. Donthu, “Developing a Scale to Measure Perceived Quality of an Internet Shopping Site (SITEQUAL)”, Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2001, pp.31-46.
[11]  V. A. Zeithaml, A. Parasuraman, and A. Malhotra, “A Conceptual Framework for Understanding E-Service Quality: Implications for Future Research and Managerial Practice”, MSI Working Paper Series, Cambridge, report No. 00-115, 2000.
[12]  B. Kurniawan, “Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction in Purchase Decision on Ticket Online: A Case Study in Air Asia”, Online Available: Pg 85 from http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/3312, 2010.
[13]  M. D. Clemes, C. Gan, T. H. Kao, and M. Choong, “An Empirical Analysis of Customer Satisfaction in International Air Travel” Innovative Marketing, Vol. 4(2), 2008, pp. 50-62.
[14]  E. Yeoh, and J. L. C. Kim, “Malaysian Low Cost Airlines: Key Influencing Factors on Customers' Repeat Purchase Intention”, World Applied Sciences Journal 12 (Special Issue of Tourism & Hospitality, 2011, pp.35-43.
[15]  G.C. Saha, Theingi, “Service Quality, Satisfaction, and Behavioural Intentions: A Study of Low-Cost Airline Carriers in Thailand”, Manag. Serv. Qual., Vol.19 (3), 2009, pp.350-372.
[16]  P. Oyewole, M. Sankaran, and, P. Choudhury, “Marketing Airline Services in Malaysia: A Consumer Satisfaction Orientation Approach” Innovative Marketing, Vol. 3, Issue 1, 2007, pp.56-70.
[17]  R. Archana, and M. V. Subha, “A Study on Service Quality and Passenger Satisfaction on Indian Airlines”, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. Vol. 2 (2), 2012, pp.50-63.
[18]  A. A. M. Ariffin, A. H. M. Salleh, N. A. Aziz, and A. A. Asbudin, “Service Quality and Satisfaction for Low Cot Carriers”, International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol. 6(1), 2010, pp.47-56.
[19]  J. Munusamy, and S. Chelliah, “An Investigation of Impact of Service Strategy on Customer Satisfaction in the Budget Airline Industry in Malaysia: A Case Study of Air Asia”, Contemporary Marketing Review, Vol.1 (1), 2011, pp.1-13.
[20]  J. Munusamy, S. Chelliah, and S. Pandian, “Customer Satisfaction Delivery in Airline Industry in Malaysia: A Case of Low Cost Carrier”, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol.5 (11), 2011, pp.718-723.
[21]  R. Lindstrøm Jensen, “Delivering Excellent Service Quality in Low Cost Aviation: A Process Perspective on the Passenger Market in Copenhagen Airport”, International Marketing & Management.Thesis, Copenhagen Business School, 2009.
[22]  P. Malighetti, S. Paleari, and R. Redondi, “Pricing Strategies of Low-Costs Airlines: The Ryanair Case”, Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol.15 (4), 2009, pp.195-203.
[23]  Y. K. Kim, and H. R. Lee, “Customer Satisfaction Using Low Cost Carriers”. Tourism Management, Vol.32, Issue 2, 2011, pp.235-243.
[24]  C. Shchiglik, and S. J. Barnes, “Evaluating Website Quality in the Airline Industry”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol.44 (3), 2004, pp.17-25.
[25]  C. Hadi, “Buying Environment Characteristics in the Context of E-service within Airlines Companies in Jabodetabek”, Project Paper, Binus University Jakarta, 2010.
[26]  T. C. Lau, C. L. Kwek, and H. P. Tan, “Airline e-Ticketing Service: How e-Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction Impacted Purchase Intention”, International Business Management, Vol.5 (4), 2011, pp.200-208.
[27]  F. Lee, and W. Wu, “Moderating Effects of Technology Acceptance Perspectives on E-Service Quality Formation: Evidence from Airline Websites in Taiwan”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38 (6), 2011, pp.7766–7773.
[28]  V. D, Merwe, “The Impact of Electronic Service Quality Dimensions on Customer Satisfaction”, Bussiness Management Theses. Univ Nelson Mandela Metropolitan, 2011.
[29]  S. Bukhari, A. Ghoneim, and C. Dennis, “Understanding the Factors that attract Travellers to Buy Airline Tickets Online in Saudi Arabia.” European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, 2012, pp.619-628.
[30]  F. P. J. Jansen, “German Sunday Shoppers in Roermond: Shopping Motivations and Choice Criteria”, thesis, Marketing Department, Tilburg University, 2006.
[31]  J. E. Francis, and L .White, “Value across Fulfillment-product Categories of Internet Shopping”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 14 Iss: 2/3, 2004, pp.226 –234.
[32]  J. E. Francis, “Category-specific RECIPEs for Internet Retailing Quality”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 23 Iss: 7, 2009, pp.450 – 461.
[33]  K. Nusair, and J. Kandampully, “The Antecedents of Customer Satisfaction with Online Travel Services: A Conceptual Model”, Europe Business Review, Vol.20 (1), 2008, pp.4-19.
[34]  D. Buhalis, “eAirlines: Strategic and tactical use of ICTS in the Airline Industry”, Information & Management, Vol.41 (7), 2004, pp.805-825.
[35]  M. F. M. Sam, and M. N. H. Tahir, “Website Quality and Consumer Online Purchase Intention of Air Ticket”, International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, IJBAS, Vol.9, No.10, 2009, pp.20-25.
[36]  C. N. L. Tan, K. J. Gwee, T. H. Ng, and Y. S. Lim, “Predictors of Business-To-Consumer Electronic Commerce Usage among Online Consumers in Malaysia”, 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research Proceeding, 2011, pp.562-580.
[37]  S. A. Kaynama, and C. I. Black, “A Proposal to Assess the Service Quality of Online Travel Agencies: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of Professional Services Marketing, Vol.21 (1), 2000, pp.63–89.
[38]  C. Ho, and Y. Lee, “The Development of an E-travel Service Quality Scale”, Tourism Management, Vol.28 (6), 2007, pp.1434-1449.
[39]  J. E. Mills, and A. M. Morrison, “Measuring Customer Satisfaction with Online Travel”, Information and Communication Technology 2003: Proceedings of the International Conference in Helsinki, Finland, 2003, pp.10-19.
[40]  W. G. Kim, and H. Y. Lee, “Comparison of Web Service Quality between Online Travel Agencies and Online Travel Suppliers”, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, Vol.17 (2-3), 2004, pp.105-116.
[41]  H. Murphy, and A. Leung, “E-service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty: an investigation of a third party website”, Proceedings of the EUROCHRIE Conference, 2010.
[42]  M. Moharrer, H. Tahayori, A. Albadavi, S. H. Zegori, and, H. Perzon, “Satisfaction in E-Tourism A Case of European Online Customers”. Proceedings of the IADIS e-Commerce 2006 International Conference, 2006, pp.303 – 307.
[43]  A. Parasuraman, V. A Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry, “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64 No.1, 1988, pp.12-40.
[44]  G. Bressolles, “Electronic Service Quality: Netqual – Proposition of a Measurement Scale to Commercial Websites and Moderating Effects”, Research and Applications in Marketing, Vol.21 (3), 2006, pp.19-45.
[45]  N. Ahituv, and Gil. Amoray, “Website Evaluation in the Tourism Industry: Evaluating Quality of Customer Service in Airline B2C Systems”, Mgt. Sc. thesis, Tel Aviv Univ, 2006.
[46]  G. Apostolou, and A. A. Economides, “Airlines websites evaluation around the world”, Proceedings of SPRINGER Communications in Computer and Information Science (CCIS) 19, 2008, pp.611-617.
[47]  S. Alwahaishi, A. Nehari, and V. Snasel, "Electronic Commerce Growth in Developing Countries: Barriers and Challenges", Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Networked Digital Technologies, 2009, pp.225-232.
[48]  S. Alwahaishi, and V. Snasel, “Assessing the LCC websites quality”, Proceedings - 9th RoEduNet IEEE International Conference, RoEduNet, 2010, pp.107-111.
[49]  T. L. Childers, C. L. Carr, J. Peck, and S. Carson, “Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior”, Journal of Retailing, Vol.77 (4), 2001, pp.511–535.
[50]  M. Conyette, “Demographics for Segmentation in Online Travel”, International Journal of Trade, Economics and Fiance, Vol. 2, no. 1, 2011, pp. 93-98.
[51]  W. C. Tsao, and H. R. Chang, “Exploring the Impact of Personality Traits on Online Shopping Behavior”, African J. Business Management, Vol. 4 (9), 2010, pp.1800-1812.
[52]  S. Beldona, A. M. Morrison, J. Oleary, “Online Shopping Motivations and Pleasure Travel Products: A Correspondence Analysis”, Tourism Management, Vol.26 (4), 2005, 561-570.
[53]  P. L. To, C. C. Liao, and T. H. Lin, “Shopping Motivations on Internet: A Study based on Utilitarian and Hedonic Value”, Technovation, Vol.27 (12), 2007, pp.774-787.
[54]  N. Delafrooz, L. H. Paim, S. A. Haron, S. M. Sidin, and A. Khatibi, Factors Affecting Students' Online Shopping Attitude and Purchase Intention”, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 3 (5), 2009, pp. 200-209.
[55]  G. C. Moore, and I. Benbasat, “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation”, Information Systems Research, Vol.2 (3), 1991, pp.192-222.
[56]  E. T. K. Lim, D. Cyr, and C. W. Tan, “Untangling Utilitarian and Hedonic Consumption Behaviors in Online Shopping”, In Proceedings of the 16th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS’12), 2012.
[57]  R. Vázquez-Casielles, “Virtual Travel Agencies: Developing a Roadmap for Competitiveness”, online available: http://www.wharton.universia.net/index.cfm?fa=viewArticle&id=1856&language=english, 2010.
[58]  E. C. Hirschman, and M. B. Holbrook, “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.46 (3), 1982, pp.92-101.
[59]  B. J. Babin, W. R. Darden, and M. Griffen, “Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value”, Journal of Consumer Research, vol.20 (4), 1994, pp.644–656.
[60]  S. Cai, and Y. Xu, “Effects of Outcome, Process and Shopping Enjoyment on Online Consumer Behaviour”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol.5, 2006, 272-281.
[61]  A. Bhatnagar, and S. Ghosh, “A Latent Class Segmentation Analysis of E-Shoppers”, Journal of Business Research, vol.57 (7), 2004, pp.758-767.
[62]  O. T. Ahtola, “Hedonic and Utilitarian aspects of Consumer Behaviour; An Attitudinal Perspective”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.12, 1985, pp.7-10.
[63]  L. Zhou, L. Dai, and D. Zhang, “Online Shopping Acceptance Model: A critical survey of consumer factors in online shopping”, J Electronic Commerce Research, Vol.8, No.1, 2007, pp.41-62.